Effect of Acute Antidepressant Administration on Negative Affective Bias in Depressed Patients

University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK.
American Journal of Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 12.3). 09/2009; 166(10):1178-84. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09020149
Source: PubMed


Acute administration of an antidepressant increases positive affective processing in healthy volunteers, an effect that may be relevant to the therapeutic actions of these medications. The authors investigated whether this effect is apparent in depressed patients early in treatment, prior to changes in mood and symptoms.
In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, between-groups randomized design, the authors examined the effect of a single 4-mg dose of the norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor reboxetine on emotional processing. Thirty-three depressed patients were recruited through primary care clinics and the community and matched to 31 healthy comparison subjects. Three hours after dosing, participants were given a battery of emotional processing tasks comprising facial expression recognition, emotional categorization, and memory. Ratings of mood, anxiety, and side effects were also obtained before and after treatment.
Depressed patients who received placebo showed reduced recognition of positive facial expressions, decreased speed in responding to positive self-relevant personality adjectives, and reduced memory for this positive information compared to healthy volunteers receiving placebo. However, this effect was reversed in patients who received a single dose of reboxetine, despite the absence of changes in subjective ratings of mood or anxiety.
Antidepressant drug administration modulates emotional processing in depressed patients very early in treatment, before changes occur in mood and symptoms. This effect may ameliorate the negative biases in information processing that characterize mood and anxiety disorders. It also suggests a mechanism of action compatible with cognitive theories of depression.

Download full-text


Available from: Elisa Favaron, Jan 02, 2014
    • "Among these task varieties, an identification task in which participants are asked to label facial emotions with given semantic emotional categories has frequently been used due to its simple task demand. Accumulated studies using this method have provided evidence that indicates abnormality of facial emotion recognition within depressed populations (Bhagwagar, Cowen, Goodwin, & Harmer, 2004; Gollan, Pane, McCloskey, & Coccaro, 2008; Harmer et al., 2009; Hayward, Goodwin, Cowen, & Harmer, 2005; Lawrence et al., 2004; Leppanen, Milders, Bell, Terriere, & Hietanen, 2004; Mikhailova, Vladimirova, Iznak, Tsusulkovskaya, & Sushko, 1996; Sheline et al., 2001; Surguladze et al., 2004). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is a high prevalence of depression in adults with a history of childhood maltreatment. A negative cognitive bias is implicated in the etiology of depressive symptomatology and has also been found in physically abused children who show preferential processing of anger. However, how these biases mediate the link between childhood maltreatment and adult depression has not yet been clarified. This study involved 36 patients with depression (19 with and 17 without a history of childhood maltreatment) and 40 healthy controls (18 with and 22 without a history of childhood maltreatment). All participants were assessed using a facial emotion recognition task. Healthy individuals with a history of childhood maltreatment made significantly more errors in recognizing fear than anger. This difference between the number of errors for fear and anger was higher in healthy abused individuals than healthy nonabused individuals and depressed abused individuals. Resilient individuals with a history of childhood maltreatment but who have not developed depression show absence of a fear bias, which may help explain why they do not manifest depressive symptoms, despite their experiences of childhood maltreatment. In contrast, other individuals who become vulnerable to depression after childhood maltreatment show an amplified bias toward fear. © The Author(s) 2015.
    Child Maltreatment 08/2015; 20(4). DOI:10.1177/1077559515600781 · 2.77 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Such a design allows the elements altered by an intervention to be elucidated and is an essential step in understanding how interventions produce effects on symptoms (Kraemer et al., 2002). Behavioral measures may also be more sensitive at detecting cognitive change than self-report measures (Harmer et al., 2009; Rawal et al., 2013a). Second, it directly compares a number of differing preventive interventions which allows comparison of the variables that they change as well as their effect on depressive symptoms while controlling for nonspecific intervention effects (Merry and Stasiak, 2012; Stallard et al., 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Effective methods to prevent adolescent depressive symptoms could reduce suffering and burden across the lifespan. However, psychological interventions delivered to adolescents show efficacy only in symptomatic or high-risk youth. Targeting causal risk factors and assessing mechanistic change can help devise efficacious universal or classroom based prevention programs. A non-randomized longitudinal design was used to compare three classroom-based prevention programs for adolescent depression (Behavioral Activation with Reward Processing, "Thinking about Reward in Young People" (TRY); Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT)), and determine cognitive mechanisms of change in these programs. Cognitive mechanisms examined were reward-seeking, negative self-beliefs (assessed with behavioral tasks) and over-general autobiographical memory. 256 healthy adolescents aged 13-14 participated with 236 (92%) and 227 (89%) completing the pre- and post-assessments. TRY was the only intervention associated with a reduction in depressive symptoms at follow-up. Reward-seeking increased following TRY. In the other programs there were non-significant changes in cognitive mechanisms, with more reflective negative self-beliefs in CBT and fewer over-general autobiographical memories in MBCT In the TRY program, which focused on increasing sensitivity to rewarding activities, reward seeking increased and this was associated with decreased depressive symptoms. Due to the infeasibility of a cluster randomized controlled trial, a non-randomized design was used. Increased reward-seeking was associated with decreased depressive symptoms and may be a mechanism of depressive symptom change in the intervention with a focus on enhancing sensitivity and awareness of reward. This study provides preliminary evidence to suggest that incorporating activities to enhance reward sensitivity may be fruitful in randomized controlled trials of universal prevention programs for depression. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.
    Journal of Affective Disorders 07/2015; 186:320-327. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2015.07.019 · 3.38 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Clinical studies suggest that behavioral therapy and psychotropic drugs, such as antidepressants and anxiolytics , can positively affect the processing of social cues both in individuals with mood disorders (Harmer et al., 2009; Tranter et al., 2009) and in healthy adults (Harmer et al., 2003, 2004). Indeed, it has been suggested that changes in perception of affective stimuli precede and even predict improvements in mood and social functioning . "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many psychoactive drugs increase social behavior and enhance social interactions, which may, in turn, increase their attractiveness to users. Although the psychological mechanisms by which drugs affect social behavior are not fully understood, there is some evidence that drugs alter the perception of emotions in others. Drugs can affect the ability to detect, attend to, and respond to emotional facial expressions, which in turn may influence their use in social settings. Either increased reactivity to positive expressions or decreased response to negative expressions may facilitate social interaction. This article reviews evidence that psychoactive drugs alter the processing of emotional facial expressions using subjective, behavioral, and physiological measures. The findings lay the groundwork for better understanding how drugs alter social processing and social behavior more generally.
    Behavioural Pharmacology 07/2015; 26(6). DOI:10.1097/FBP.0000000000000164 · 2.15 Impact Factor
Show more