Specificities of defense mechanisms in bipolar affective disorder: relations with symptoms and therapeutic alliance.

Departments of Psychology, University Hospitals of Lausanne, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
The Journal of nervous and mental disease (Impact Factor: 1.81). 09/2009; 197(9):675-81. DOI: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181b3b224
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Defense mechanisms as a central notion of psychoanalysis have inspired various levels of interest in research in psychotherapy and psychopathology. Defense specificities have only recently been investigated systematically with regard to several clinical diagnoses, such as affective and personality disorders. For the present study, 30 inpatients diagnosed with Bipolar Affective Disorder I (BD) were interviewed. An observer-rater method, the Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales (DMRS), applied to session-transcripts, of assessment of defenses was used. A matched, nonclinical control group was introduced. Defense specificities in BD encompass a set of 5 immature defenses, of which omnipotence is linked with symptom level. The level of the therapeutic alliance is predicted by mature defenses. These results are discussed with regard to the psychological vulnerability of BD, and treatment implications for psychodynamic psychotherapy with such challenging patients are evoked.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales (DMRS), one of the most widely used and validated instruments in the study of defense mechanisms, does not include psychotic defenses. The Psychotic-DMRS (P-DMRS) has been developed to include 6 psychotic defense mechanisms: psychotic denial, autistic withdrawal, distortion, delusional projection, fragmentation, and concretization. We discuss psychotic defenses, including the difference between psychotic defenses and psychotic symptoms. Six clinical illustrations demonstrate how the 6 P-DMRS defenses can be identified in patients' narratives selected from the transcripts of dynamic interviews. Implications with respect to patient evaluation and treatment are discussed.
    Journal of Clinical Psychology 05/2014; 70(5). DOI:10.1002/jclp.22087 · 2.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Defence mechanisms and coping have rarely been investigated from an integrative point of view. We are particularly interested in stability and change of these adaptational processes in clinical crisis situations of in-patients presenting with bipolar affective disorder. We conducted a controlled interview study including an in-patient and a matched control group; longitudinal data are provided by follow-up interviewing for all participants. A total of N=18 participants per group (patients presenting with bipolar affective disorder and non-clinical controls) were recruited and interviewed twice. All interviews were transcribed and analysed according to observer-rater systems for coping (Coping Action Patterns) and defence mechanisms (Defence Mechanism Rating Scales). Symptom check list-90-R, as well as specific symptomatic measures, were used for symptomatic assessment and hierarchical linear modelling was used for statistical computation. Overall, defensive functioning remains stable over a 3 month period, whereas overall, coping functioning increases over the same period in-patients, as they are discharged from in-patient treatment; no such effect was found in controls. Overall, stability in adaptational processes may be attributed to defensive functioning, whereas change over short periods of time are related to coping concepts in in-patients presenting with bipolar affective disorder.
    British Journal of Clinical Psychology 08/2009; 49(Pt 3):291-306. DOI:10.1348/014466509X457397 · 1.90 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Defense mechanism is a key concept in the psychoanalytic psychopathology of borderline personality disorder (BPD). Theoretical and empirical elaborations on this question are briefly reviewed and discussed with respect to process assessment of defense mechanisms; we put forward observer-rater methodology as an accurate means of assessing unconscious in-session processes. A sample of 25 patients presenting with BPD were interviewed, as were subjects from a matched control group without psychiatric symptoms (n = 25), using a psychodynamic interview paradigm. These interviews were transcribed and rated using the Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales. The results indicate that, compared to controls, patients with BPD used higher percentages of a action, borderline, disavowal, narcissistic, and hysteric defenses, along with lower levels of mature and obsessional defenses. Overall defensive functioning was significantly lower in the patients with BPD, compared to controls. Narcissistic defenses were related with symptom level. These results are discussed in light of previous studies on defensive functioning of BPD and the literature on psychoanalytic psychopathology. These results have several important clinical implications. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved) (journal abstract)
    Psychoanalytic Psychology 01/2013; .30(1-1):pp. DOI:10.1037/a0029463 · 0.83 Impact Factor