Article

Chest compression fraction determines survival in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation.

MSc, Emergency and Health Services Commission of British Columbia, 302-2955 Virtual Way, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V5M 4X6.
Circulation (Impact Factor: 14.95). 09/2009; 120(13):1241-7. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.852202
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation contributes to cardiac arrest survival. The proportion of time in which chest compressions are performed in each minute of cardiopulmonary resuscitation is an important modifiable aspect of quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We sought to estimate the effect of an increasing proportion of time spent performing chest compressions during cardiac arrest on survival to hospital discharge in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia.
This is a prospective observational cohort study of adult patients from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Cardiac Arrest Epistry with confirmed ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia, no defibrillation before emergency medical services arrival, electronically recorded cardiopulmonary resuscitation before the first shock, and a confirmed outcome. Patients were followed up to discharge from the hospital or death. Of the 506 cases, the mean age was 64 years, 80% were male, 71% were witnessed by a bystander, 51% received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 34% occurred in a public location, and 23% survived. After adjustment for age, gender, location, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, bystander witness status, and response time, the odds ratios of surviving to hospital discharge in the 2 highest categories of chest compression fraction compared with the reference category were 3.01 (95% confidence interval 1.37 to 6.58) and 2.33 (95% confidence interval 0.96 to 5.63). The estimated adjusted linear effect on odds ratio of survival for a 10% change in chest compression fraction was 1.11 (95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.21).
An increased chest compression fraction is independently predictive of better survival in patients who experience a prehospital ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia cardiac arrest.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
137 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction A systematic review of all trials (two Australian and one European) randomizing patients in the prehospital setting to a little or a lot of chest compressions prior to first analysis demonstrated no significant benefit for any patient and for a comparison across subgroups based on initial shockable rhythm and an Emergency Medical Services (EMS) response time interval of >5 min versus ≤5 min. The European trial had suggested a significant difference in this comparison which was not supported in the meta-analysis. A large randomized trial from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) investigators was completed and published after this systematic review and reported a nonsignificant comparison across a different time interval (4 min) which did not allow a direct comparison. The objective of this study was to obtain unpublished data from the recent trial and expand the meta-analysis. Methods Data was obtained with permission from the ROC investigators to use unpublished data to compare with the three other trials. The intervention protocol and timing of chest compressions in relation to first analysis and randomization used in the prior clinical trials were confirmed with all authors (Wik, Jacobs, Baker, Stiell). A random effects model was used to conduct the meta-analysis and the endpoint was survival to discharge. Results The cumulative odds ratio for all initially shockable patients was 0.92 (0.65, 1.29); for those with an EMS response time interval of ≤ 5 min was 0.86 (0.56, 1.30) and for an EMS response time interval of >5 min was 1.05 (0.46, 2.35). Conclusion A cumulative meta-analysis of the four trials for a common endpoint of survival to discharge in the cohort of patients with an initial shockable rhythm and employing the same time intervals of interest shows no significant difference in favor of a short arrival time (≤5 min) or with a long arrival time (>5 min). There is no difference between an early versus late approach to analysis and shock in trials in North America or Australia with bystander CPR rates from 39% to over 60%. Any differences in outcome with the European trial may be attributed to the lack of uniformity of reporting time dependent intervals in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest across all geographical regions. This begs us to revisit the Utstein predictors of outcome and more comprehensively define these variables, adjust for them in our analyses and improve global comparisons.
    Notfall 08/2012; 15(6):494-499. · 0.32 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a kind of emergency treatment for cardiopulmonary arrest, and chest compression is the most important and necessary part of CPR. The American Heart Association published the new Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care in 2010 and demanded for better performance of chest compression practice, especially in compression depth and rate. The current study was to explore the relationship of quality indexes of chest compression and to identify the key points in chest compression training and practice.
    World journal of emergency medicine. 01/2013; 4(1):54-8.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Inadvertent hyperventilation is associated with poor outcomes from traumatic brain injury (TBI). Hypocapnic cerebral vasoconstriction is well described and causes an immediate and profound decrease in cerebral perfusion. The hemodynamic effects of positive-pressure ventilation (PPV) remain incompletely understood but may be equally important, particularly in the hypovolemic patient with TBI. Objective: Preliminary report on the application of a previously described mathematical model of perfusion and ventilation to prehospital data to predict intrathoracic pressure. Methods: Ventilation data from 108 TBI patients (76 ground transported, 32 helicopter transported) were used for this analysis. Ventilation rate (VR) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (PetCO2) values were used to estimate tidal volume (VT). The values for VR and estimated VT were then applied to a previously described mathematical model of perfusion and ventilation. This model allows input of various lung parameters to define a pressure–volume relationship, then derives mean intrathoracic pressure (MITP) for various VT and VR values. For this analysis, normal lung parameters were utilized. Separate analyses were performed assuming either fixed or variable PaCO2–PetCO2 differences. Ground and air medical patients were compared with regard to VR, PetCO2, estimated VT, and predicted MITP. Results: A total of 10,647 measurements were included from the 108 TBI patients, representing about 13 minutes of ventilation per patient. Mean VR values were higher for ground patients versus air patients (21.6 vs. 19.7 breaths/min; p < 0.01). Estimated VT values were similar for ground and air patients (399 mL vs. 392 mL; p = NS) in the fixed model but not the variable (636 vs. 688 mL, respectively; p < 0.01). Mean PetCO2 values were lower for ground versus air patients (30.6 vs. 33.8 mmHg; p < 0.01). Predicted MITP values were higher for ground versus air patients, assuming either fixed (9.0 vs. 8.1 mmHg; p < 0.01) or variable (10.9 vs. 9.7 mmHg; p < 0.01) PaCO2–PetCO2 differences. Conclusions: Predicted MITP values increased with ventilation rates. Future studies to externally validate this model are warranted.
    Prehospital Emergency Care 10/2014; · 1.81 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
66 Downloads
Available from
May 26, 2014