Large refractory colonic polyps: is it time to change our practice? A prospective study of the clinical and economic impact of a tertiary referral colonoscopic polypectomy service
ABSTRACT Patients who have large, difficult, colorectal lesions not readily amenable to endoscopic resection are often referred directly to surgery. The application of advanced polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) techniques undertaken by a tertiary referral colonic mucosal resection and polypectomy service (TRCPS) is not often considered but may be superior to surgery.
To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and cost savings of a TRCPS for colorectal lesions.
Prospective intention-to-treat analysis.
Tertiary academic referral center.
In a 21-month period ending in April 2008, consecutive patients with large or complex colorectal polyps referred by other specialist endoscopists were prospectively enrolled on an intention-to-treat basis.
For sessile lesions, a standardized EMR approach was used. Pedunculated lesions were removed with or without pretreatment with an Endoloop procedure.
Complete resection, complications, recurrence, and potential cost savings comparing actual outcome of the cohort with a hypothetical analysis of surgical management.
This study included 174 patients (mean age 68 years) who were referred with 193 difficult polyps (186 laterally spreading, mean size 30 mm [range 10-80 mm]). We totally excised 173 laterally spreading lesions by EMR (115 piecemeal, 58 en bloc). Invasive adenocarcinoma was found in 6 lesions-5 treated successfully with EMR. Eleven patients were referred directly to surgery without an endoscopic attempt due to suspected invasive carcinoma. Seven >30-mm, pedunculated polyps were removed. There were no perforations. A total of 20 bed days was used because of endoscopic complications. Among all patients referred, 90% avoided the need for surgery. Excluding patients who were treated surgically for invasive cancer, the procedural success was 95% (157 of 168). By using Australian cost estimates applied to the entire group and compared with cost estimates assuming all patients had undergone surgery, we calculated the total medical cost savings was $6990 (U.S.) per patient, or a total savings of $1,216,231 (U.S.).
Not a randomized trial.
Colonoscopic polypectomy performed by a TRCPS on large or difficult polyps is technically effective and safe. This approach results in major cost savings and avoids the potential complications of colonic surgery. This type of clinical pathway should be developed to enhance patient outcomes and reduce health care costs.
- SourceAvailable from: PubMed Central
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
- "There were no perforations. The authors pointed out that endoscopic therapy not only spared patients the morbidity of surgery, but was also cost-effective.49 "
ABSTRACT: Rapid growth in the field of advanced gastrointestinal endoscopy has led to an increase in specialized therapeutic endoscopy fellowships. The cornerstones of these programs are training in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasound. These procedures are more complex and challenging to master than routine colonoscopy and upper endoscopy, and in the case of ERCP, higher risk. The concentration of the educational experience in the hands of relatively fewer trainees with specialized interest in advanced endoscopy has resulted in providing a focused cohort of graduating fellows with higher case volumes in training, which likely enhances diagnostic and therapeutic success and safer performance of these procedures. Endoscopic simulators, although not currently in widespread use, have the potential to improve advanced procedural training without jeopardizing patient safety.01/2011; 2:25-34. DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S13310
Conference Paper: An interface circuit for piezoresistive pressure sensors[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: An interfacing circuit for piezoresistive pressure sensors based on CMOS second generation current conveyors is presented. Main advantages of the proposed circuit include the use of only two piezoresistors, low offset, high CMRR using CCII based instrumentation amplifier, temperature compensation and high linearity of the output frequency. Simulation as well as experimental results are included to demonstrate its performanceElectrotechnical Conference, 1998. MELECON 98., 9th Mediterranean; 06/1998
Conference Paper: SNR sensitivity of matched and mismatched radar compression filters[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In this paper a comparative analysis of sidelobe levels at matched and mismatched filters depending on input signal-to-noise ratio is presented. The analysis was performed for various types of sequences. The sidelobe level of the mismatched filter output is lower than the sidelobe level of the matched filter output up to some threshold level of the input signal SNR value. Below that level, the sidelobe level is determined by the noise level and the difference between filters elapsesElectrotechnical Conference, 1998. MELECON 98., 9th Mediterranean; 06/1998