A parietal-premotor network for movement intention and motor awareness

Centre de Neuroscience Cognitive, UMR 5229, CNRS, Bron, France.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences (Impact Factor: 21.15). 10/2009; 13(10):411-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.08.001
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT It is commonly assumed that we are conscious of our movements mainly because we can sense ourselves moving as ongoing peripheral information coming from our muscles and retina reaches the brain. Recent evidence, however, suggests that, contrary to common beliefs, conscious intention to move is independent of movement execution per se. We propose that during movement execution it is our initial intentions that we are mainly aware of. Furthermore, the experience of moving as a conscious act is associated with increased activity in a specific brain region: the posterior parietal cortex. We speculate that movement intention and awareness are generated and monitored in this region. We put forward a general framework of the cognitive and neural processes involved in movement intention and motor awareness.

Download full-text


Available from: Angela Sirigu, Oct 29, 2014
  • Source
    • ", 2010 ; Miele , Wager , Mitchell , & Metcalfe , 2011 ) , but also in other areas such as the anterior insula and parietal reach regions ( PRR ) , given previous accounts suggesting a key role of these areas in the sense of agency ( Farrer et al . , 2003 , 2004 ; Karnath & Baier , 2010a ; Karnath , Baier , & Nagele , 2005 ; Sperduti , Delaveau , Fossati , & Nadel , 2011 ) and motor awareness ( Assal , Schwartz , & Vuilleumier , 2007 ; Desmurget & Sirigu , 2009 ; Sirigu et al . , 2004 ) . "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Metacognition refers to the ability to discriminate between one’s own correct and incorrect decisions. The neurobiological underpinnings of metacognition have mainly been studied in perceptual decision-making. Here we investigated whether differences in brain structure predict individual variability in metacognitive sensitivity for visuomotor performance. Participants had to draw straight trajectories toward visual targets, which could unpredictably deviate around detection threshold, report such deviations when detected, and rate their confidence level for such reports. Structural brain MRI analyses revealed that larger gray-matter volume (GMV) in the left middle occipital gyrus, left medial parietal cortex, and right postcentral gyrus predicted higher deviation detection sensitivity. By contrast, larger GMV in the right prefrontal cortex but also right anterior insula and right fusiform gyrus predicted higher metacognitive sensitivity. These results extend past research by linking metacognitive sensitivity for visuomotor behavior to brain areas involved in action agency (insula), executive control (prefrontal cortex) and vision (fusiform).
    Consciousness and Cognition 07/2015; 36(November 2015):327-337. DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2015.07.012 · 2.31 Impact Factor
    • "This cluster exhibited specific co-activation with the SMA, the left anterior IPS/SMG, bilateral putamen and thalami, and showed a clear involvement in basic motor control functions. This finding is consistent with a large body of literature on a parietal–premotor network involved in action planning (Jeannerod et al. 1995; Wise et al. 1997; Rushworth et al. 2003; Desmurget and Sirigu 2009) and RSFC delineations of a " sensorimotor network " (Smith et al. 2009; Power et al. 2011). Ventrally, the IFJ bordered a cluster that extended on the IFG (Cluster 3). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The inferior frontal junction (IFJ) area, a small region in the posterior lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC), has received increasing interest in recent years due to its central involvement in the control of action, attention, and memory. Yet, both its function and anatomy remain controversial. Here, we employed a meta-analytic parcellation of the left LPFC to show that the IFJ can be isolated based on its specific functional connections. A seed region, oriented along the left inferior frontal sulcus (IFS), was subdivided via cluster analyses of voxel-wise whole-brain co-activation patterns. The ensuing clusters were characterized by their unique connections, the functional profiles of associated experiments, and an independent topic mapping approach. A cluster at the posterior end of the IFS matched previous descriptions of the IFJ in location and extent and could be distinguished from a more caudal cluster involved in motor control, a more ventral cluster involved in linguistic processing, and 3 more rostral clusters involved in other aspects of cognitive control. Overall, our findings highlight that the IFJ constitutes a core functional unit within the frontal lobe and delineate its borders. Implications for the IFJ's role in human cognition and the organizational principles of the frontal lobe are discussed. © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail:
    Cerebral Cortex 04/2015; DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhv073 · 8.67 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "How best to interpret the apparent buildup of neuronal activity preceding conscious decisions has been debated extensively (Gomes 1999). The general view is that the 'early-decision' account is not compatible with the idea of conscious intentions causing our actions, and many have taken this to be evidence that unconscious process causes both motor preparation and conscious intentions (Desmurget and Sirigu 2009; Haggard 2011; Wegner 2003). We suspect that this view remains tied to the traditional framework to the extent that it assumes a single moment or a single location within which the unconscious decision to act emerges (Dennett 2003). "
Show more