Point/Counterpoint. The linear-quadratic model is inappropriate to model high dose per fraction effects in radiosurgery.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
Medical Physics (Impact Factor: 3.01). 08/2009; 36(8):3381-4. DOI: 10.1118/1.3157095
Source: PubMed
Download full-text


Available from: Colin G Orton, Jun 27, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although the same simple laws govern cancer outcome (cell division repeated again and again), each tumour has a different outcome before as well as after irradiation therapy. The linear-quadratic radiosensitivity model allows an assessment of tumor sensitivity to radiotherapy. This model presents some limitations in clinical practice because it does not take into account the interactions between tumour cells and non-tumoral bystander cells (such as endothelial cells, fibroblasts, immune cells…) that modulate radiosensitivity and tumor growth dynamics. These interactions can lead to non-linear and complex tumor growth which appears to be random but that is not since there is not so many tumors spontaneously regressing. In this paper we propose to develop a deterministic approach for tumour growth dynamics using chaos theory. Various characteristics of cancer dynamics and tumor radiosensitivity can be explained using mathematical models of competing cell species.
    Cancer/Radiothérapie 07/2012; 16(5-6):404-9. · 1.11 Impact Factor
  • Source
    X Congreso Internacional de Métodos Numéricos en Ingeniería y Ciencias Aplicadas, CIMENICS’2010. Modelos Computacionales en Ingeniería: Desarrollos Novedosos y Aplicaciones; 01/2010
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Relative to X-ray beams, proton [(1)H] and carbon ion [(12)C] beams provide superior distributions due primarily to their finite range. The principal differences are LET, low for (1)H and high for (12)C, and a narrower penumbra of (12)C beams. Were (12)C to yield a higher TCP for a defined NTCP than (1)H therapy, would LET, fractionation or penumbra width be the basis? Critical factors of physics, radiation biology of (1)H and (12)C ion beams, neutron therapy and selected reports of TCP and NTCP from (1)H and (12)C irradiation of nine tumor categories are reviewed. Outcome results are based on low dose per fraction (1)H and high dose per fraction (12)C therapy. Assessment of the role of LET and dose distribution vs dose fractionation is not now feasible. Available data indicate that TCP increases with BED with (1)H and (12)C TCPs overlaps. Frequencies of GIII NTCPs were higher after (1)H than (12)C treatment. Assessment of the efficacy of (1)H vs(12)C therapy is not feasible, principally due to the dose fractionation differences. Further, there is no accepted policy for defining the CTV-GTV margin nor definition of TCP. Overlaps of (1)H and (12)C ion TCPs at defined BED ranges indicate that TCPs are determined in large measure by dose, BED. Late GIII NTCP was higher in (1)H than (12)C patients, indicating LET as a significant factor. We recommend trials of (1)H vs(12)C with one variable, i.e. LET. The resultant TCP vs NTCP relationship will indicate which beam yields higher TCP for a specified NTCP at a defined dose fractionation.
    Radiotherapy and Oncology 02/2010; 95(1):3-22. DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2010.01.015 · 4.86 Impact Factor