Adenosine-Induced Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Dual-Source Cardiac Computed Tomography

Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Department of Radiology and Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Impact Factor: 15.34). 09/2009; 54(12):1072-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.014
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study sought to determine the feasibility of performing a comprehensive cardiac computed tomographic (CT) examination incorporating stress and rest myocardial perfusion imaging together with coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA).
Although cardiac CT can identify coronary stenosis, very little data exist on the ability to detect stress-induced myocardial perfusion defects in humans.
Thirty-four patients who had a nuclear stress test and invasive angiography were included in the study. Dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) was performed as follows: 1) stress CT: contrast-enhanced scan during adenosine infusion; 2) rest CT: contrast-enhanced scan using prospective triggering; and 3) delayed scan: acquired 7 min after rest CT. Images for CTA, computed tomography perfusion (CTP), and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) were each read by 2 independent blinded readers.
The DSCT protocol was successfully completed for 33 of 34 subjects (average age 61.4 +/- 10.7 years; 82% male; body mass index 30.4 +/- 5 kg/m(2)) with an average radiation dose of 12.7 mSv. On a per-vessel basis, CTP alone had a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 80% for the detection of stenosis > or =50%, whereas SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging had a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 83%. For the detection of vessels with > or =50% stenosis with a corresponding SPECT perfusion abnormality, CTP had a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 74%. The CTA during adenosine infusion had a per-vessel sensitivity of 96%, specificity of 73%, and negative predictive value of 98% for the detection of stenosis > or =70%.
Adenosine stress CT can identify stress-induced myocardial perfusion defects with diagnostic accuracy comparable to SPECT, with similar radiation dose and with the advantage of providing information on coronary stenosis.


Available from: Brian Ghoshhajra, Mar 04, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cardiac perfusion along with imaging of coronary artery stenosis is an important tool in assessing the degree of coronary artery disease (CAD) and decision-making regarding further treatment. SPECT, PET, echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging are clinically established techniques to evaluate myocardial perfusion and viability with a high diagnostic accuracy and relatively few unwanted side effects. However, none of these modalities Glose can reliably assess the extent and morphology of CAD, features which also have implications as well as for patient management. In contrast, cardiac CT has emerged over the last years as a reliable tool to visualise coronary atherosclerotic plaque and stenosis, nearly unaffected by heart rate and carrying a relatively low radiation exposure; however, without allowing an adequate assessment of myocardial perfusion. Given the great promise of a combined cardiac CT examination to assess morphology and function, much research has recently been focused on the development of CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging techniques. In this article, we review recent developments in cardiac CT with respect to myocardial perfusion imaging, especially the two main techniques, first-pass and dynamic CT acquisitions.
    International journal of clinical practice. Supplement 10/2011; 65(173):14-22. DOI:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02786.x
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-derived computed fractional flow reserve (FFR(CT)) and transluminal attenuation gradient (TAG) for the diagnosis of lesion-specific ischemia. Although CCTA is commonly used to detect coronary artery disease (CAD), it cannot reliably assess the functional significance of CAD. Novel technologies based on CCTA were developed to integrate anatomical and functional assessment of CAD; however, the diagnostic performance of these methods has never been compared. Fifty-three consecutive patients who underwent CCTA and coronary angiography with FFR measurement were included. Independent core laboratories determined CAD severity by CCTA, TAG, and FFR(CT). The TAG was defined as the linear regression coefficient between intraluminal radiological attenuation and length from the ostium; FFR(CT) was computed from CCTA data using computational fluid dynamics technology. Among 82 vessels, 32 lesions (39%) had ischemia by invasive FFR (FFR ≤0.80). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratio of TAG (≤ -0.654 HU/mm) for detection of ischemia were 38%, 88%, 67%, 69%, 3.13, and 0.71, respectively; and those of FFR(CT) were 81%, 94%, 90%, 89%, 13.54, and 0.20, respectively. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showed a significantly larger area under the curve (AUC) for FFR(CT) (0.94) compared to that for TAG (0.63, p < 0.001) and CCTA stenosis (0.73, p < 0.001). In vessels with noncalcified plaque or partially calcified plaque, FFR(CT) showed a larger AUC (0.94) compared to that of TAG (0.63, p < 0.001) or CCTA stenosis (0.70, p < 0.001). In vessels with calcified plaque, AUC of FFR(CT) (0.92) was not statistically larger than that of TAG (0.75, p = 0.168) or CCTA stenosis (0.80, p = 0.195). Noninvasive FFR computed from CCTA provides better diagnostic performance for the diagnosis of lesion-specific ischemia compared to CCTA stenosis and TAG.
    JACC. Cardiovascular imaging 11/2012; 5(11):1088-96. DOI:10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.09.002 · 6.99 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We sought to determine the accuracy of combined coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging (CTP) in the detection of hemodynamically significant stenoses using fractional flow reserve (FFR) as a reference standard in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. CTP can be qualitatively assessed by visual interpretation or quantified by the transmural perfusion ratio determined as the ratio of subendocardial to subepicardial contrast attenuation. The incremental value of each technique in addition to coronary CTA to detect hemodynamically significant stenoses is not known. Forty symptomatic patients underwent FFR and 320-detector computed tomography assessment including coronary CTA and CTP. Myocardial perfusion was assessed using the transmural perfusion ratio and visual perfusion assessment. Computed tomography images were assessed by consensus of 2 observers. Transmural perfusion ratio <0.99 was used as the threshold for abnormal perfusion. FFR ≤0.8 indicated hemodynamically significant stenoses. Coronary CTA detected FFR-significant stenoses with 95% sensitivity and 78% specificity. The additional use of visual perfusion assessment and the transmural perfusion ratio both increased the specificity to 95%, with sensitivity of 87% and 71%, respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for coronary CTA + visual perfusion assessment was significantly higher than both coronary CTA (0.93 vs. 0.85, p = 0.0003) and coronary CTA + the transmural perfusion ratio (0.93 vs. 0.79, p = 0.0003). Per-vessel and per-patient accuracy for coronary CTA, coronary CTA + the transmural perfusion ratio, and coronary CTA + visual perfusion assessment was 83% and 83%, 87% and 92%, and 92% and 95%, respectively. In suspected coronary artery disease, combined coronary CTA + CTP identifies patients with hemodynamically significant stenoses with >90% accuracy compared with FFR. When interpreted with coronary CTA, visual perfusion assessment provided superior incremental value in the detection of FFR-significant stenoses compared with the quantitative transmural perfusion ratio assessment.
    JACC. Cardiovascular imaging 11/2012; 5(11):1097-111. DOI:10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.09.004 · 6.99 Impact Factor