Identifying Risk for Attrition during Treatment for Depression

Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-9119, USA.
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (Impact Factor: 9.2). 10/2009; 78(6):372-9. DOI: 10.1159/000235977
Source: PubMed


Understanding patients' ambivalence about treatment persistence may be useful in tailoring retention interventions for individual patients with major depressive disorder.
Participants (n = 265) with major depressive disorder were enrolled into an 8-week trial with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. At baseline and week 2, the participants were asked about their intent to return for the next visit, complete the study and continue in the study should they experience side effects or no improvement. Dropouts were defined as participants who discontinued attending clinic visits before completing the trial.
Participants who at baseline reported an uncertain/negative intent to continue if they experienced side effects or no improvement dropped out at a significantly higher rate by weeks 6 and 8. Uncertain/negative intent at week 2 predicted attrition at all following visits. Dropouts without side effects were more likely to have reported an uncertain/negative intent to attend at both baseline and week 2, while dropouts who experienced side effects were more likely to have reported an uncertain/negative intent to attend only at baseline. Positive intent to continue was associated with greater symptom improvement in both dropouts and completers despite the possibility of lack of efficacy.
Participants' pretreatment concerns about continuing antidepressant treatment in the presence of side effects signals challenges to the completion of a full 8-week acute phase treatment, even if the participant does not develop side effects. Individualized review of concerns and tailoring appropriate interventions may be necessary to reduce attrition.

Download full-text


Available from: G K Balasubramani, Oct 06, 2015
28 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Attitudes and expectations about treatment have been associated with symptomatic outcomes, adherence and utilization in patients with psychiatric disorders. No measure of patients' anticipated benefits of treatment on domains of everyday functioning has previously been available. The Anticipated Benefits of Care (ABC) is a new, 10-item questionnaire used to measure patient expectations about the impact of treatment on domains of everyday functioning. The ABC was collected at baseline in adult out-patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) (n=528), bipolar disorder (n=395) and schizophrenia (n=447) in the Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP). Psychometric properties of the ABC were assessed, and the association of ABC scores with treatment response at 3 months was evaluated. Evaluation of the ABC's internal consistency yielded Cronbach's alpha of 0.90-0.92 for patients across disorders. Factor analysis showed that the ABC was unidimensional for all patients and for patients with each disorder. For patients with MDD, lower anticipated benefits of treatment was associated with less symptom improvement and lower odds of treatment response [odds ratio (OR) 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-0.87, p=0.0011]. There was no association between ABC and symptom improvement or treatment response for patients with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia, possibly because these patients had modest benefits with treatment. The ABC is the first self-report that measures patient expectations about the benefits of treatment on everyday functioning, filling an important gap in available assessments of attitudes and expectations about treatment. The ABC is simple, easy to use, and has acceptable psychometric properties for use in research or clinical settings.
    Psychological Medicine 09/2009; 40(6):955-65. DOI:10.1017/S003329170999136X · 5.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Meta-analyses have consistently concluded that a positive therapeutic alliance is associated with better clinical outcomes and progress. To date, however, very few studies have focused on sociodemographic or clinical patient characteristics as moderators of alliance. A multicenter longitudinal treatment outcome study was conducted to investigate the associations of patient and clinician perceptions of the therapeutic alliance with improvement in depression, and to investigate whether these associations were influenced by sociodemographic or clinical characteristics of the patient. Clinician-rated Montgomery Åsberg Depressive Rating Scale scores and both patient- and therapist-rated Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAQ-I) scores were obtained from 567 outpatients with major depressive disorder who received 6 months of combined psycho- and pharmacotherapy. Multilevel repeated-measures analyses indicated that patient- and therapist-rated HAQ-I scores, 4 weeks after treatment began, positively predicted subsequent clinical change, controlling for the effect of early improvement and a range of patient characteristics. Next to alliance, early improvement, initial depressive symptom severity, a history of psychiatric disorders, and occupational status affected the rate of clinical improvement. Personality pathology comorbidity, marital and occupational status, and the atypical character of the major depressive episode (MDE) moderated the alliance-outcome relationship, depending on the informant (patient or therapist) of therapeutic alliance. The present findings suggest that therapist and patient ratings of therapeutic alliance predict therapeutic progress, and that this relation may be moderated by client characteristics, including personality pathology comorbidity, marital status, occupational status, and the atypical character of the MDE.
    Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 09/2010; 79(6):378-85. DOI:10.1159/000320895 · 9.20 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Adverse events during selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment are frequent and may lead to premature treatment discontinuation. If attrition is associated with early worsening of adverse effects or the frequency, intensity, or burden of adverse effects, interventions to maximize retention could be focused on patients with these events. Outpatient participants (n = 265) with nonpsychotic major depressive disorder entered an 8-week trial with an SSRI. At baseline and week 2, specific adverse effects were evaluated with the Systematic Assessment for Treatment Emergent Events--Systematic Inquiry, and at week 2, the Frequency, Intensity, and Burden of Side Effects Rating globally assessed adverse effects. Attrition was defined by those participants who left treatment after week 2 but before week 8. No specific week 2 adverse effect, either treatment-emergent or with worsening intensity, was independently associated with attrition. Global ratings of adverse effect frequency, intensity, or burden at week 2 were also not associated with subsequent attrition. Neither global ratings nor specific adverse effects at week 2 were related to patient attrition during SSRI treatment. Other factors seem to contribute to patient decisions about continuing with treatment.
    Journal of clinical psychopharmacology 06/2010; 30(3):259-66. DOI:10.1097/JCP.0b013e3181dbfd04 · 3.24 Impact Factor
Show more