Article
Comparison of high-field and low-field magnetic resonance images of cadaver limbs of horses.
Animal Health Trust, Lanwades Park, Kentford, Newmarket CB8 7UU, UK.
The Veterinary record (impact factor:
1.25).
10/2009;
165(10):281-8.
pp.281-8
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (2)
-
Article: Magnetic resonance imaging findings in dogs with traumatic intervertebral disk extrusion with or without spinal cord compression: 31 cases (2006-2010).
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Objective-To determine the prevalence of spinal cord compression subsequent to traumatic intervertebral disk (IVD) extrusion in dogs, characterize factors associated with spinal cord compression in dogs with traumatic IVD extrusion, and evaluate the outcomes of dogs with traumatic IVD extrusion with or without spinal cord compression. Design-Retrospective case series. Animals-31 dogs with traumatic IVD extrusion. Procedures-Medical records and MRI findings were reviewed for dogs with a history of trauma to the spinal region. Dogs were included in the study if a neurologic examination and MRI were performed and there was a description of clinical signs and MRI findings including identification of the spinal cord segment affected by IVD extrusion, presence or absence of spinal cord compression, treatment, and outcome available for review. Results-31 of 50 (62%) dogs had traumatic IVD extrusions without any other detectable vertebral lesions; 9 (29%) and 22 (71%) of those 31 dogs did and did not have spinal cord compression, respectively. Dogs with spinal cord compression were significantly older and more likely to be chondrodystrophic and have evidence of generalized IVD degeneration, compared with dogs without spinal cord compression. The outcome for dogs with spinal cord compression was similar to that for dogs without spinal cord compression. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-Results indicated traumatic IVD extrusion was common and should be considered as a differential diagnosis for dogs with trauma to the spinal region, and spinal cord compression should be evaluated, especially in older or chondrodystrophic dogs.Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 01/2013; 242(2):217-22. · 1.79 Impact Factor -
Article: Pros and cons of low-field magnetic resonance imaging in veterinary practice.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Low-field (LF) (0.2-0.4T) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging predominates in veterinary practice. Advantages of LF MR include reduced costs, better patient access, and greater safety. High quality examinations can be achieved using appropriate protocols and investing more scanning time than with high-field (HF) systems. The main disadvantage of LF MR is the reduced signal to noise ratio compared with HF systems. LF MR protocols for small animal brain and spine imaging are described.Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound 52(1 Suppl 1):S5-S14. · 1.08 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
abnormal navicular flexor fibrocartilage
anatomical arrangement
Articular cartilage
articular surfaces
different sites
fetlock region
foot/pastern region
gross examination
gross pathological examinations
high-field 1.5T system
high-field images
high-field MRI
histological examinations
imaging sequences
low-field 0.27T system
low-field images
magic angle artefact
normal tissues
pathological examination
two systems