Article

A neural network model for credit risk evaluation.

Intelligent Systems Research Group, Near East University, Lefkosa, Mersin 10, Turkey.
International Journal of Neural Systems (Impact Factor: 5.05). 09/2009; 19(4):285-94. DOI: 10.1142/S0129065709002014
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Credit scoring is one of the key analytical techniques in credit risk evaluation which has been an active research area in financial risk management. This paper presents a credit risk evaluation system that uses a neural network model based on the back propagation learning algorithm. We train and implement the neural network to decide whether to approve or reject a credit application, using seven learning schemes and real world credit applications from the Australian credit approval datasets. A comparison of the system performance under the different learning schemes is provided, furthermore, we compare the performance of two neural networks; with one and two hidden layers following the ideal learning scheme. Experimental results suggest that neural networks can be effectively used in automatic processing of credit applications.

2 Bookmarks
 · 
265 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Risk Management improvement and credit risk evaluation are turning core areas of concern within the financial and banking industries. Specifically credit scoring, as one of the key analytical techniques in credit risk evaluation is envisioned as an arena in which the application of Artificial Intelligence (IA) and Neural systems has high potential for development. This paper contributes by presenting a novel Neural based approach to enhance credit scoring modeling inspired by the biological metaplasticity property of neurons.
    International Journal of Neural Systems 03/2014; · 5.05 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The assessment of the risk of default on credit is important for financial institutions. Different Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) have been suggested to tackle the credit scoring problem, however, the obtained error rates are often high. In the search for the best ANN algorithm for credit scoring, this paper contributes with the application of an ANN Training Algorithm inspired by the neurons' biological property of metaplasticity. This algorithm is especially efficient when few patterns of a class are available, or when information inherent to low probability events is crucial for a successful application, as weight updating is overemphasized in the less frequent activations than in the more frequent ones. Two well-known and readily available such as: Australia and German data sets has been used to test the algorithm. The results obtained by AMMLP shown have been superior to state-of-the-art classification algorithms in credit scoring.
    International Journal of Neural Systems 08/2011; 21(4):311-7. · 5.05 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: During the last years there has been a growing need of developing innovative tools that can help small to medium sized enterprises to predict business failure as well as financial crisis. In this study we present a novel hybrid intelligent system aimed at monitoring the modus operandi of the companies and predicting possible failures. This system is implemented by means of a neural-based multi-agent system that models the different actors of the companies as agents. The core of the multi-agent system is a type of agent that incorporates a case-based reasoning system and automates the business control process and failure prediction. The stages of the case-based reasoning system are implemented by means of web services: the retrieval stage uses an innovative weighted voting summarization of self-organizing maps ensembles-based method and the reuse stage is implemented by means of a radial basis function neural network. An initial prototype was developed and the results obtained related to small and medium enterprises in a real scenario are presented.
    International Journal of Neural Systems 08/2011; 21(4):277-96. · 5.05 Impact Factor