Phase II study of S-1 as first-line treatment for elderly patients over 75 years of age with advanced gastric cancer: the Tokyo Cooperative Oncology Group study.
ABSTRACT This prospective multicenter phase II study was carried out to investigate the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of S-1 monotherapy in elderly patients over 75 years of age, with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.
Patients had measurable or evaluable lesions according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma. S-1 (25-60 mg determined by the body surface area and creatinine clearance) was given orally, twice daily. A course of treatment consisted of 4-week administration followed by a 2-week rest period, and the patients received repeated courses.
Thirty-three patients were enrolled. Pharmacokinetics of S-1 was studied in six patients, and the maximum plasma concentrations of respective metabolites after S-1 administration were found to be similar to those reported for younger cancer patients. The overall response rate in 33 patients was 21.2% (95% CI, 10.7-37.8%), and median progression-free survival was 3.9 months, with a median overall survival of 15.7 months. Frequently noted adverse events include leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, anorexia, and fatigue. As for serious adverse events, relatively higher frequencies of anemia (9%) and anorexia (12%) of grade 3 severity were found, but there were no grade 4 episodes.
The results suggest that S-1 monotherapy is safe and useful for elderly patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer when the dose is selected with caution, taking into account renal function.
- SourceAvailable from: Masashi Kanai[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine/S-1 combination chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer were eligible for inclusion. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Gemcitabine was administered intravenously at a dose of 1,000 mg/m(2) over 30 min on days 1 and 8, and oral S-1 was administered daily at a dose of 60 mg/m(2) on days 1-14. This schedule was repeated every 3 weeks until disease progression or patient refusal. Twenty-five patients were enrolled between October 2007 and January 2009. Eleven patients (44%) had extrahepatic bile duct cancer, 5 (20%) had intrahepatic bile duct cancer, 8 had gallbladder cancer (32%), and 1 (4%) had ampulla of Vater cancer. The median overall survival time was 12.7 months (95% CI, 8.4-23.5 months), and the 1-year survival rate was 52.0% (95% CI, 31.2-69.2%). Of the 23 patients with evaluable target regions, seven patients experienced a partial response, and an overall response rate was 30.4%. The following grade 3-4 hematological toxicities occurred: neutropenia (56%), leukopenia (24%), anemia (8%) and thrombocytopenia (4%). In spite of the high incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia, no patients developed febrile neutropenia in the present study. The major grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicities were fatigue (8%), anorexia (8%) and diarrhea (4%). Gemcitabine/S-1 combination chemotherapy offered a promising survival benefit with acceptable toxicity in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 06/2011; 67(6):1429-34. DOI:10.1007/s00280-010-1443-5 · 2.57 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Although S-1 is effective against advanced gastric cancer (AGC), its efficacy in elderly patients has not yet been investigated sufficiently. We assessed the efficacy and safety of S-1 monotherapy in elderly patients with AGC. We conducted a retrospective review of the data of 153 patients with unresectable/recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma who received S-1 monotherapy as first-line chemotherapy at our institution. S-1 was administered orally twice daily at the dose of 40 mg/m², on days 1-28, every 6 weeks. We categorized the patients into three groups, the young (≤65 years old), the middle-aged (66-75 years old), and the elderly (≥76 years old); and the drug toxicity, objective responses, progression-free survivals, and overall survivals were compared among the three groups. The incidence of leukopenia of grade 3 or greater in the three groups was 7%, 5%, and 13%, and that of anemia was 9%, 18%, and 27%, respectively. In regard to nonhematological toxicities, the incidence of nausea of grade 3 or greater was 3%, 5%, and 13%; that of fatigue was 5%, 11%, and 20%; and that of anorexia was 5%, 6%, and 27%, respectively. As for the treatment efficacy, the objective response rates, median progressionfree survivals, and overall survivals in the young, middle-aged, and elderly groups were 53%, 46%, and 33%; 7.8, 5.6, and 3.9 months; and 16.9, 17.1; and 7.7 months, respectively. Although S-1 monotherapy showed moderate efficacy in elderly (≥76 years) patients with AGC, patients in this age group showed higher incidences of severe toxicities than the younger patients.Gastric Cancer 11/2010; 13(4):245-50. DOI:10.1007/s10120-010-0566-z · 4.83 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Les cancers digestifs sont fréquents chez les patients âgés. Cependant, en dehors des cancers colorectaux, les études spécifiques aux patients âgés évaluant la prise en charge de ces cancers sont rares. Il apparaît que chez des patients correctement sélectionnés des traitements validés chez les patients plus jeunes sont applicables. L’adaptation du traitement à chaque cas doit faire l’objet d’une discussion pluridisciplinaire impliquant un gériatre. Digestive cancers are frequent in elderly patients. However, there are few specific studies on treatment in elderly patients. Selection of the patient is basic to apply the treatment validated in younger patient. Adaptation of the treatment to each case should be done in a multidisciplinary team with a geriatrician. Mots clésOncogériatrie–Cancer de l’oesophage–Cancer de l’estomac–Cancer du pancréas–Carcinome hépatocellulaire KeywordsOncogeriatry–Oesophagus cancer–Gastric cancer–Pancreatic cancer–Hepatocellular carcinomaOncologie 03/2011; 13(2):90-96. DOI:10.1007/s10269-011-1987-y · 0.08 Impact Factor