Article

B Cell Receptor and BAFF Receptor Signaling Regulation of B Cell Homeostasis

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
The Journal of Immunology (Impact Factor: 5.36). 10/2009; 183(6):3561-7. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0800933
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT B lymphocyte homeostasis depends on tonic and induced BCR signaling and receptors sensitive to trophic factors, such as B cell-activating factor receptor (BAFF-R or BR3) during development and maintenance. This review will discuss growing evidence suggesting that the signaling mechanisms that maintain B cell survival and metabolic fitness during selection at transitional stages and survival after maturation rely on cross-talk between BCR and BR3 signaling. Recent findings have also begun to unravel the molecular mechanisms underlying this crosstalk. In this review I also propose a model for regulating the amplitude of BCR signaling by a signal amplification loop downstream of the BCR involving Btk and NF-kappaB that may facilitate BCR-dependent B cell survival as well as its functional coupling to BR3 for the growth and survival of B lymphocytes.

1 Follower
 · 
98 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The selection and maturation of B-cell clones are critically determined by tonic signals from activated B cell receptors (BCR) and survival signals from BAFF cytokine. These finely tuned and coordinated signals provide a net positive signal that can promote the selection, maturation, proliferation and differentiation of a developing B cell. Stimulation with an anti-IgD antibody can also activate BCR but can lead to depletion and an arrest of mature B-cell development in vivo. It is not known whether survival signals from excess BAFF can override the suppressive effects of treatment with anti-IgD on mature B cells in vivo. Herein, we examine the effects of co-treatment of BAFF and anti-IgD on the mature B-cell compartment and antibody production in vivo by treating mice with either 1mg/kg BAFF or anti-IgD alone or in combination for 3 consecutive days. We found that co-treatment with anti-IgD significantly abrogated these stimulatory effects of BAFF treatment on splenic CD19+ B cells as well as mature CD19+IgD(hi)IgM+ B cells in vivo. Anti-IgD down-regulated the expression of the BCR complex (mIgM, mIgD and CD19) and the BAFF receptor TACI without regard to the presence of BAFF. Anti-IgD treatment also significantly negated BAFF-induced IgM production in vivo. Both BAFF and anti-IgD could individually stimulate IL-10 synthesis in B cells but did not affect one another. Taken together, our data suggest that activation of BCR with an anti-IgD antibody can override the stimulatory effects from excess BAFF on B cell proliferation and antibody production by down-regulating the expression of BCR complex and BAFF receptors.
    Immunology Letters 06/2014; 161(1). DOI:10.1016/j.imlet.2014.06.007 · 2.37 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Inhibitors of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) possess much promise for the treatment of oncologic and autoimmune indications. However, our current knowledge of the role of BTK in immune competence has been gathered in the context of genetic inactivation of btk in both mice and man. Using the novel BTK inhibitor PF-303, we model the clinical phenotype of BTK inhibition by systematically examining the impact of PF-303 on the mature immune system in mice. We implicate BTK in tonic BCR signaling, demonstrate dependence of the T3 B cell subset and IgM surface expression on BTK activity, and find that B1 cells survive and function independently of BTK. Although BTK inhibition does not impact humoral memory survival, Ag-driven clonal expansion of memory B cells and Ab-secreting cell generation are inhibited. These data define the role of BTK in the mature immune system and mechanistically predict the clinical phenotype of chronic BTK inhibition.
    The Journal of Immunology 06/2014; 193(1). DOI:10.4049/jimmunol.1302570 · 5.36 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Gram negative bacterium, Vibrio cholerae (Vc) causes cholera, an enteric disease that has killed untold numbers of humans. In the 19 th century, whole-cell (W-C) cholera vaccines were tested in humans. Field trials (1960s-70s) of injected, killed W-C (kW-C) Vc showed cholera-specific immune responses (antibodies, Abs) could be induced with a single dose in certain cohorts, but more durable immunity was sought with oral cholera vaccines. Newer, killed (two doses) and later modified live (one dose) W-C cholera vaccines for oral delivery were developed and extensively tested. After over 200 years, no consensus exists as to what are protective Vc antigens or how to identify them. An endur-ing cholera vaccine for children <5 years of age and Vc-antigen naïve individuals is still needed. The cholera outbreak in Haiti underscores some unresolved issues associated with the current cholera vaccines. Annually, is there enough cholera vaccine for those who need it? Who needs to be vaccinated and when? Given the displacement of populations during flooding like in Pakistan or in Haiti due to an earthquake, can a single dose of the kW-C cholera vaccine function to pre-vent or to contain an outbreak? What does 'working' entail: solely preventing deaths, or that plus long term immunity? Can a single formulation of Vc antigens be used for endemic or epidemic cholera which may require reactive vaccination for epidemics, but prophylactic vaccination for endemic cholera? The immunologic realities given the logistic issues for the different needs of a cholera vaccine are discussed.
    The Open Vaccine Journal 12/2011; 4(1). DOI:10.2174/1875035401104010018

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
4 Downloads
Available from
Mar 13, 2015