Article

Right ventromedial and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices mediate adaptive decisions under ambiguity by integrating choice utility and outcome evaluation.

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom.
Journal of Neuroscience (impact factor: 7.11). 10/2009; 29(35):11020-8. DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1279-09.2009 pp.11020-8
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The Iowa gambling task (IGT) is one of the most influential behavioral paradigms in reward-related decision making and has been, most notably, associated with ventromedial prefrontal cortex function. However, performance in the IGT relies on a complex set of cognitive subprocesses, in particular integrating information about the outcome of choices into a continuously updated decision strategy under ambiguous conditions. The complexity of the task has made it difficult for neuroimaging studies to disentangle the underlying neurocognitive processes. In this study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging in combination with a novel adaptation of the task, which allowed us to examine separately activation associated with the moment of decision or the evaluation of decision outcomes. Importantly, using whole-brain regression analyses with individual performance, in combination with the choice/outcome history of individual subjects, we aimed to identify the neural overlap between areas that are involved in the evaluation of outcomes and in the progressive discrimination of the relative value of available choice options, thus mapping the two fundamental cognitive processes that lead to adaptive decision making. We show that activation in right ventromedial and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was predictive of adaptive performance, in both discriminating disadvantageous from advantageous decisions and confirming negative decision outcomes. We propose that these two prefrontal areas mediate shifting away from disadvantageous choices through their sensitivity to accumulating negative outcomes. These findings provide functional evidence of the underlying processes by which these prefrontal subregions drive adaptive choice in the task, namely through contingency-sensitive outcome evaluation.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
20 Views

Keywords

accumulating negative outcomes
 
adaptive performance
 
available choice options
 
choice/outcome history
 
cognitive subprocesses
 
contingency-sensitive outcome evaluation
 
continuously updated decision strategy
 
dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
 
functional evidence
 
functional magnetic resonance imaging
 
individual performance
 
integrating information
 
neuroimaging studies
 
novel adaptation
 
prefrontal subregions drive adaptive choice
 
two fundamental cognitive processes
 
two prefrontal areas
 
underlying neurocognitive processes
 
underlying processes
 
whole-brain regression analyses