Article

Does skin cleansing with chlorhexidine affect skin condition, temperature and colonization in hospitalized preterm low birth weight infants?: a randomized clinical trial.

Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
Journal of perinatology: official journal of the California Perinatal Association (Impact Factor: 1.59). 09/2009; 29(12):795-801. DOI: 10.1038/jp.2009.110
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To examine if single skin cleansing with 0.25% chlorhexidine affects skin condition, temperature and bacterial colonization in stable preterm (28-36 weeks gestational age) low birth weight (1001-2000 g) infants admitted in a health facility.
Eligible infants were randomized within 3 h of birth into the following three groups: chlorhexidine, normal saline or no skin cleansing. Infants in the first two groups were wiped once with baby wipes containing either 0.25% chlorhexidine or saline. Skin condition, axillary temperature and skin colonization rates in the axilla and the groin were assessed at specified time intervals after intervention.
In all, 60 infants were included in the study (20 in each group). Median skin condition scores at 72 and 168 h after the intervention were 2 and 2, respectively, in all three groups. At 30 min after skin cleansing, two infants each in the chlorhexidine and saline cleansing groups and none in the no cleansing group experienced cold stress (36-36.4 degrees C). There was, however, no difference in mean skin temperature of the groups (36.6 degrees C). At 24 h, skin colonization rates in the axilla were 22.2, 52.7, and 57.9%, respectively, in the chlorhexidine, saline and no cleansing groups (P=0.06); skin cleansing with chlorhexidine reduced the incidence of colonization by 62% compared with no cleansing (relative risk (RR): 0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.15, 0.98), but there was no significant reduction when compared with saline cleansing (RR: 0.42; 0.16-1.10). Axillary colonization rates at 72 h and colonization at the groin at 24 and 72 h were not significantly different across the three groups.
Single skin cleansing with 0.25% chlorhexidine did not adversely affect skin condition or temperature in hospitalized preterm infants and reduced axillary-skin colonization at 24 h after the intervention. Trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of such an intervention on the incidence of infections in preterm neonates.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
179 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Skin care practices play an important role in the health of well newborns and hospitalized neonates. Fortunately, for many aspects of neonatal skin care, there exist evidence- or consensus-based recommendations to guide best practices. Based on our review of the recent medical literature, we include in this manuscript the current recommendations regarding neonatal skin cleansing and antisepsis; umbilical cord care; use of emollients; and prevention of diaper dermatitis. In addition, we review the recommended practices for preventing and treating pressure ulcers, wounds, and other skin injuries in hospitalized neonates.
    International journal of dermatology 01/2013; 52(1):14-22. · 1.18 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) is a widely used topical antiseptic that is recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for skin cleansing before central venous catheter insertion in adults and children. Because of limited safety data, CHG is not recommended for use in children <2 months of age. CHG is, however, frequently used in Neonatal Intensive Care Units across the United States. Here, we will review the safety of CHG use in preterm infants.
    Journal of perinatology: official journal of the California Perinatal Association 01/2012; 32(1):4-9. · 1.59 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:: Cord cleansing with chlorhexidine has been shown to reduce the risk of neonatal mortality in low-resource settings. The effect of whole body skin cleansing with chlorhexidine in neonates is, however, not clear. METHODS:: We searched MEDLINE and other databases and included all studies that evaluated the effect of chlorhexidine cleansing on neonatal mortality rate (NMR) and/or the incidence of neonatal sepsis. We estimated the pooled relative risks by fixed effect and random effects models and also explored the sources of heterogeneity by subgroup meta-analysis. RESULTS:: Seven randomized trials and two before-and-after studies that evaluated single cleansing with chlorhexidine were included in the review. Pooled analysis showed no significant effect on NMR in either the fixed effect (5 studies; relative risk [RR] 0.91; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.04) or random-effects model (0.83; 0.63 to 1.08). On subgroup analysis, the before-and-after study conducted in high-NMR setting showed significant reduction in mortality (0.68; 0.50 to 0.93) but the RCTs from low-NMR settings did not show any benefit (0.97; 0.84 to 1.13).Pooled analysis of five studies that reported the rates of sepsis revealed substantial heterogeneity (I=80.2%). Pooled result by random effects model as well as the sensitivity analysis including only the randomized trials found no significant effect (0.65; 0.40 to 1.05 and 0.97; 0.80 to 1.18, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:: There is no conclusive evidence for any beneficial effect after single skin cleansing with chlorhexidine. However, given the heterogeneity in the major outcomes it seems prudent to generate more evidence from randomized trials in high-NMR settings. Until such time, this intervention cannot be recommended in any settings.
    The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 01/2013; · 3.57 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
8 Downloads
Available from
Jul 3, 2014