Trends in hip fracture rates in Canada.

Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association (Impact Factor: 30.39). 09/2009; 302(8):883-9. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1231
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Hip fractures are a public health concern because they are associated with significant morbidity, excess mortality, and the majority of the costs directly attributable to osteoporosis.
To examine trends in hip fracture rates in Canada.
Ecologic trend study using nationwide hospitalization data for 1985 to 2005 from a database at the Canadian Institute for Health Information. Data for all patients with a hospitalization for which the primary reason was a hip fracture (570,872 hospitalizations) were analyzed.
Age-specific and age-standardized hip fracture rates.
There was a decrease in age-specific hip fracture rates (all P for trend <.001). Over the 21-year period of the study, age-adjusted hip fracture rates decreased by 31.8% in females (from 118.6 to 80.9 fractures per 100,000 person-years) and by 25.0% in males (from 68.2 to 51.1 fractures per 100,000 person-years). Joinpoint regression analysis identified a change in the linear slope around 1996. For the overall population, the average age-adjusted annual percentage decrease in hip fracture rates was 1.2% (95% confidence interval, 1.0%-1.3%) per year from 1985 to 1996 and 2.4% (95% confidence interval, 2.1%-2.6%) per year from 1996 to 2005 (P < .001 for difference in slopes). Similar changes were seen in both females and males with greater slope reductions after 1996 (P < .001 for difference in slopes for each sex).
Age-standardized rates of hip fracture have steadily declined in Canada since 1985 and more rapidly during the later study period. The factors primarily responsible for the earlier reduction in hip fractures are unknown.

Download full-text


Available from: Sonia Jean, Jul 07, 2015
1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Population-based incident fracture data aid fracture prevention and therapy decisions. Our purpose was to describe 10-year site-specific cumulative fracture incidence by sex, age at baseline, and degree of trauma with/without consideration of competing mortality in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study adult cohort. Methods: Incident fractures and mortality were identified by annual postal questionnaires to the participant or proxy respondent. Date, site and circumstance of fracture were gathered from structured interviews and medical records. Fracture analyses were stratified by sex and age at baseline and used both Kaplan-Meier and competing mortality methods. Results: The baseline (1995-97) cohort included 6314 women and 2789 men (aged 25-84 years; mean +/- SD 62 +/- 12 and 59 +/- 14, respectively), with 4322 (68%) women and 1732 (62%) men followed to year-10. At least one incident fracture occurred for 930 women (14%) and 247 men (9%). Competing mortality exceeded fracture risk for men aged 65 + years at baseline. Age was a strong predictor of incident fractures especially fragility fractures, with higher age gradients for women vs. men. Major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) (hip, clinical spine, forearm, humerus) accounted for 41-74% of fracture risk by sex/age strata; in women all MOF sites showed age-related increases but in men only hip was clearly age-related. The most common fractures were the forearm for women and the ribs for men. Hip fracture incidence was the highest for the 75-84 year baseline age-group with no significant difference between women 7.0% (95% CI 53, 8.9) and men 7.0% (95% CI 4.4, 10.3). Interpretation: There are sex differences in the predominant sites and age-gradients of fracture. In older men, competing mortality exceeds cumulative fracture risk.
    Bone 11/2014; 71. DOI:10.1016/j.bone.2014.10.026 · 4.46 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Until recently, older adults with a cognitive impairment (CI) who experienced a hip fracture were filtered from being admitted into active rehabilitation units. The increased complexity of care required for older adults with a CI may negatively influence the attitudes and job satisfaction of healthcare practitioners working with this population. The current study is a part of a larger intervention study allowing patients with CI following a hip fracture access to rehabilitation care and implementing a patient-centred model to facilitate caring for this new population. This new model required a substantial change in the skillset and knowledge of healthcare practitioners. The focus of this study was to explore the impact on the healthcare practitioners of adopting this new model for providing care to older adults with a CI following a hip fracture. The attitudes, dementia knowledge, job satisfaction, and work stress of healthcare practitioners were the focus of evaluation. Key study findings showed that stress due to relationships with coworkers, workloads and scheduling, and the physical design and conditions at work were moderated post-intervention. Staff responses also improved for job satisfaction, biomedical knowledge of dementia, and degree of hopefulness about dementia. Although we cannot state conclusively that the our model was solely responsible for all the staff improvements observed post-intervention, our findings provide further support to the argument that patients with CI should be allowed access to rehabilitation care. Rehabilitation units need to provide education that utilizes a person-centred approach accepting of patients with CI, and focuses on areas that can bolster staff’s positive, dementia-sensitive attitudes. Ultimately, the aim is to create a culture that provides the highest standard of care for all patients, reduces work-related stress, increases job satisfaction, and leads to the highest quality of life for patients during and after rehabilitation.
    Advances in Aging Research 02/2014; 3(1):48-58. DOI:10.4236/aar.2014.31009
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: SummaryHip fractures are the most important type of fracture. Trends in their incidence and a possible relationship with treatments for osteoporosis are subject of debate. Our objective is to analyse changes in the incidence of hip fractures in women in the Basque Country population and the relationship with osteoporosis treatment. ObjectiveHip fractures are the most important type of fracture due to the associated high mortality and morbidity. Our objective is to analyse changes in the incidence of hip fractures in women in the Basque Country population and the relationship with osteoporosis treatment. MethodsAn observational study of hip fracture rates was carried out based on data taken from the Minimum Basic Data Set. Generalised linear models were used to assess the trends in annual rates of hip fractures for each age group. In addition, the total annual use of osteoporosis treatments was analysed. ResultsThe total number of hip fractures increased by 38% from 1994 to 2009. However, the general linear regression models indicated that the changes in the rates were only statistically significant for the 65- to 74- and 75- to 84-year-old age groups. In these groups, there were annual decreases by 2.30% (CI 1.00, 3.59) and 1.32% (CI 0.47; 2.18), respectively. The use of osteoporosis treatments has quadrupled during that time. ConclusionsThe main finding of our study is that from 1994 to 2008, there is a downwards trend in hip fracture rates in the Basque Country for the 65- to 84-year-old age bracket. Given the characteristics of the design of this study, we are not able to infer a relationship between these findings and any specific factor. Nevertheless, the fact that the change has occurred in the age groups which have received the most treatment for osteoporosis may suggest the existence of some kind of association. KeywordsAge-adjusted incidence–Epidemiology–Hip fracture–Trend analyses–Osteoporosis–Osteoporosis treatment
    Archives of Osteoporosis 12/2010; 5(1):131-137. DOI:10.1007/s11657-010-0046-4