Psychosis as a Risk Factor for Violence to Others: A Meta-Analysis

Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada, V5A 1S6.
Psychological Bulletin (Impact Factor: 14.39). 10/2009; 135(5):679-706. DOI: 10.1037/a0016311
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The potential association between psychosis and violence to others has long been debated. Past research findings are mixed and appear to depend on numerous potential moderators. As such, the authors conducted a quantitative review (meta-analysis) of research on the association between psychosis and violence. A total of 885 effect sizes (odds ratios) were calculated or estimated from 204 studies on the basis of 166 independent data sets. The central tendency (median) of the effect sizes indicated that psychosis was significantly associated with a 49%-68% increase in the odds of violence. However, there was substantial dispersion among effect sizes. Moderation analyses indicated that the dispersion was attributable in part to methodological factors, such as study design (e.g., community vs. institutional samples), definition and measurement of psychosis (e.g., diagnostic vs. symptom-level measurement, type of symptom), and comparison group (e.g., psychosis compared with externalizing vs. internalizing vs. no mental disorder). The authors discuss these findings in light of potential causal models of the association between psychosis and violence, the role of psychosis in violence risk assessment and management, and recommendations for future research.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: У овом раду смо испитивали да ли процена базичне структуре личности може да помогне у предикцији понашања делинквената у адолесцентском добу (N=54, просек узраста=18.65 година, SD=1.69), током боравка у Васпитно-поправном дому у Крушевцу. Као предиктори су коришћени Великих пет фактора личности и Дезинтеграција. Мере ових варијабли су добијене путем упитника самопроцене. Критеријумска понашања су мерена помоћу упитника на коме су понашање испитаника процењивали васпитачи који са њима раде. Факторска анализа овог упитника показала је да иза процена васпитача стоје три латентне димензије које су на основу њиховог садржаја именоване Иритабилност, Проми-шљеност и Манипулација. Након тога су извршене три анализе хијерархијске мултипле регресије са добијеним факторима као критеријумским варијаблама. Добијени налази истичу улогу фактора Сарадљивости у објашњењу критеријумских понашања, али и улогу Неуротицизма и Екстраверзије. Модалитети Дезинтеграције који допри-носе предикцији су: Социјална анхедонија, Соматоформна дисрегулација и Генерална егзекутивна дисфункција. У практичном смислу, потврђена је валидност и значај процене базичне структуре личности у раду са делинквентима.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many with schizophrenia tend to experience problems with the legal system. Yet little is still known about the correlates of the history of incarceration, as well as frequency of misdemeanor and felony convictions within community samples. To explore this question, we gathered legal and substance abuse histories, and assessments of symptoms and neurocognitive function from 96 adults in a nonacute phase of schizophrenia. ANOVA revealed history of incarceration to be linked with more severe drug and alcohol abuse histories, and greater positive symptoms. Greater numbers of misdemeanor convictions were linked to more severe drug and alcohol abuse histories and greater levels of disorganized symptoms, whereas a greater number of felony convictions was only associated with more severe drug abuse histories. A stepwise multiple regression revealed that both the severity of severe drug abuse histories and levels of disorganized symptoms contributed to predicting 24% of the variance in the number of reported lifetime misdemeanor offenses.
    Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology 06/2013; 24(3):293-308. DOI:10.1080/14789949.2013.776617 · 0.88 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous research is scarce on the problems and needs of the “triply troubled” – among offenders with mental health problems and problematic substance use. Classifying this population into clusters based on problem profiles may provide information about individual needs for treatment. In a previous study, we identified four clusters of triply troubled: less troubled, severely triply troubled, triply troubled with medical problems, and working triply troubled. The present study explored the stability and predictive validity of these clusters in a naturalistic design. In total, 125 triply troubled individuals included in any of the four clusters were followed for approximately three years with regard to their inpatient and outpatient treatment participation. They were also interviewed with the 6th version of the Addiction Severity Index, the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised, and the World Health Organization Quality of Life–Bref. The main finding of the study was that on average the participants of all four clusters exhibited substantial improvements over the course of time but that improvements were cluster-specific rather than samplespecific. Implications of the study are discussed.
    Mental Health and Substance Use dual diagnosis 11/2014; 7(4):431-445. DOI:10.1080/17523281.2014.891640