Article
Epidemiology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a tertiary referral teaching hospital.
Microbiology Department, Royal Hobart Hospital, Cardio-Respiratory Research Group, Menzies Research Institute, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania.
The Journal of hospital infection (impact factor:
3.01).
09/2009;
73(2):151-6.
DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2009.05.021
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (2)
-
Article: Emergence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cross-infection in children with cystic fibrosis attending an Iranian referral pediatric center.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study was carried out with the objective of determining the genomic variability of P. aeruginosa strains isolated from patients suffering from cystic fibrosis or from environmental cultures collected from different locations in the unit they admitted. A total of 57 clinical and environmental P. aeruginosa isolates were genotyped by enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-PCR (ERIC-PCR), and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute method. One predominant ERIC profile (type A) was identified in 46 strains (81% of all typed isolates) which was responsible for thirty-nine of 44 clinical isolates (89%) and 7 of 13 environmental isolates (54%). All clinical isolates were susceptible to piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime and cefepime followed by ticarcillin, aztreonam, amikacin and tobramycin (96.5%). In our country CF patients are not segregated from other patients, and transmission of bacteria between these patients and other patients might occur in the wards via personal contact or contaminated environment. Future evaluation for policy of patient segregation is necessary and the elimination of contaminated sources and control of environmental spread and recurrent contamination risk is needed.Iranian Journal of Microbiology 09/2012; 4(3):124-9. -
Article: The population genetics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from different patient populations exhibits high-level host specificity.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To determine whether highly prevalent P. aeruginosa sequence types (ST) in Dutch cystic fibrosis (CF) patients are specifically linked to CF patients we investigated the population structure of P. aeruginosa from different clinical backgrounds. We first selected the optimal genotyping method by comparing pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and multilocus variable number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA). Selected P. aeruginosa isolates (n = 60) were genotyped with PFGE, MLST and MLVA to determine the diversity index (DI) and congruence (adjusted Rand and Wallace coefficients). Subsequently, isolates from patients admitted to two different ICUs (n = 205), from CF patients (n = 100) and from non-ICU, non-CF patients (n = 58, of which 19 were community acquired) were genotyped with MLVA to determine distribution of genotypes and genetic diversity. Congruence between the typing methods was >79% and DIs were similar and all >0.963. Based on costs, ease, speed and possibilities to compare results between labs an adapted MLVA scheme called MLVA9-Utrecht was selected as the preferred typing method. In 363 clinical isolates 252 different MLVA types (MTs) were identified, indicating a highly diverse population (DI = 0.995; CI = 0.993-0.997). DI levels were similarly high in the diverse clinical sources (all >0.981) and only eight genotypes were shared. MTs were highly specific (>80%) for the different patient populations, even for similar patient groups (ICU patients) in two distinct geographic regions, with only three of 142 ICU genotypes detected in both ICUs. The two major CF clones were unique to CF patients. The population structure of P. aeruginosa isolates is highly diverse and population specific without evidence for a core lineage in which major CF, hospital or community clones co-cluster. The two genotypes highly prevalent among Dutch CF patients appeared unique to CF patients, suggesting specific adaptation of these clones to the CF lung.PLoS ONE 01/2010; 5(10):e13482. · 4.09 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
AES III
antimicrobial susceptibility testing
Australian epidemic strain III
CF
CF lung
CF patients
Clinical
cystic fibrosis
environmental sources
genotypically indistinguishable strain
Laboratory Standards Institute method
major tertiary referral hospital
non-CF settings
panmictic
patients
polymorphic DNA
pulsed-field gel electrophoresis
random amplification
RAPD)-polymerase chain reaction
restriction enzyme SpeI