Article

Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study.

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 13400 E Shea Blvd., Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA.
American Journal of Roentgenology (Impact Factor: 2.9). 09/2009; 193(3):764-71. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.2397
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to evaluate the image noise, low-contrast resolution, image quality, and spatial resolution of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in low-dose body CT.
Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction was used to scan the American College of Radiology phantom at the American College of Radiology reference value and at one-half that value (12.5 mGy). Test objects in low- and high-contrast and uniformity modules were evaluated. Low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction was then tested on 12 patients (seven men, five women; average age, 67.5 years) who had previously undergone routine-dose CT. Two radiologists blinded to scanning technique evaluated images of the same patients obtained with routine-dose CT and low-dose CT with and without adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Image noise, low-contrast resolution, image quality, and spatial resolution were graded on a scale of 1 (best) to 4 (worst). Quantitative noise measurements were made on clinical images.
In the phantom, low- and high-contrast and uniformity assessments showed no significant difference between routine-dose imaging and low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. In patients, low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction was associated with CT dose index reductions of 32-65% compared with routine imaging and had the least noise both quantitatively and qualitatively (p < 0.05). Low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT had identical results for low-contrast resolution and nearly identical results for overall image quality (grade 2.1-2.2). Spatial resolution was better with routine-dose CT (p = 0.004).
These preliminary results support body CT dose index reductions of 32-65% when adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction is used. Studies with larger statistical samples are needed to confirm these findings.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
144 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Medical imaging involving the use of ionizing radiation has brought enormous benefits to society and patients. In the past several decades, exposure to medical radiation has increased markedly, driven primarily by the use of computed tomography. Ionizing radiation has been linked to carcinogenesis. Whether low-dose medical radiation exposure will result in the development of malignancy is uncertain. This paper reviews the current evidence for such risk, and aims to inform the gastroenterologist of dosages of radiation associated with commonly ordered procedures and diagnostic tests in clinical practice. The use of medical radiation must always be justified and must enable patients to be exposed at the lowest reasonable dose. Recommendations provided herein for minimizing radiation exposure are based on currently available evidence and Working Party expert consensus.Am J Gastroenterol advance online publication, 20 May 2014; doi:10.1038/ajg.2014.122.
    The American journal of gastroenterology. 05/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of our study was to investigate the validity of a spatial resolution measuring method that uses a combination of a bar-pattern phantom and an image-averaging technique, and to evaluate the spatial resolution property of iterative reconstruction (IR) images with middle-contrast (50 HU) objects. We used computed tomography (CT) images of the bar-pattern phantom reconstructed by the IR technology Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D (AIDR 3D), which was installed in the multidetector CT system Aquilion ONE (Toshiba Medical Systems, Otawara, Japan). The contrast of the bar-pattern image was set to 50 HU, which is considered to be a middle contrast that requires higher spatial resolution clinically. We employed an image-averaging technique to eliminate the influence of image noise, and we obtained averaged images of the bar-pattern phantom with sufficiently low noise. Modulation transfer functions (MTFs) were measured from the images. The conventional wire method was also used for comparison; in this method, AIDR 3D showed MTF values equivalent to those of filtered back projection. For the middle-contrast condition, the results showed that the MTF of AIDR 3D decreased with the strength of IR processing. Further, the MTF of AIDR 3D decreased with dose reduction. The image-averaging technique used was effective for correct evaluation of the spatial resolution for middle-contrast objects in IR images. The results obtained by our method clarified that the resolution preservation of AIDR 3D was not sufficient for middle-contrast objects.
    Radiological Physics and Technology 06/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To perform a meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic performance of single-source 64-section computed tomography (CT) versus dual-source CT angiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD).
    Clinical radiology. 05/2014;

Full-text

View
6 Downloads
Available from