Article
Quantitative sensory testing in measurement of neuropathic pain phenomena and other sensory abnormalities.
Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792, USA.
The Clinical journal of pain (impact factor:
3.01).
10/2009;
25(7):641-7.
DOI:10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181a68c7e
pp.641-7
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (3)
-
Article: Dissecting post-herniotomy pain--scratching the surface?
Pain 08/2010; 150(2):215-6. · 5.78 Impact Factor -
Article: Test-retest and interobserver reliability of quantitative sensory testing according to the protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): a multi-centre study.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is an instrument to assess positive and negative sensory signs, helping to identify mechanisms underlying pathologic pain conditions. In this study, we evaluated the test-retest reliability (TR-R) and the interobserver reliability (IO-R) of QST in patients with sensory disturbances of different etiologies. In 4 centres, 60 patients (37 male and 23 female, 56.4±1.9years) with lesions or diseases of the somatosensory system were included. QST comprised 13 parameters including detection and pain thresholds for thermal and mechanical stimuli. QST was performed in the clinically most affected test area and a less or unaffected control area in a morning and an afternoon session on 2 consecutive days by examiner pairs (4 QSTs/patient). For both, TR-R and IO-R, there were high correlations (r=0.80-0.93) at the affected test area, except for wind-up ratio (TR-R: r=0.67; IO-R: r=0.56) and paradoxical heat sensations (TR-R: r=0.35; IO-R: r=0.44). Mean IO-R (r=0.83, 31% unexplained variance) was slightly lower than TR-R (r=0.86, 26% unexplained variance, P<.05); the difference in variance amounted to 5%. There were no differences between study centres. In a subgroup with an unaffected control area (n=43), reliabilities were significantly better in the test area (TR-R: r=0.86; IO-R: r=0.83) than in the control area (TR-R: r=0.79; IO-R: r=0.71, each P<.01), suggesting that disease-related systematic variance enhances reliability of QST. We conclude that standardized QST performed by trained examiners is a valuable diagnostic instrument with good test-retest and interobserver reliability within 2days. With standardized training, observer bias is much lower than random variance. Quantitative sensory testing performed by trained examiners is a valuable diagnostic instrument with good interobserver and test-retest reliability for use in patients with sensory disturbances of different etiologies to help identify mechanisms of neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain.Pain 03/2011; 152(3):548-56. · 5.78 Impact Factor -
Article: How close are we in utilizing functional neuroimaging in routine clinical diagnosis of neuropathic pain?
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: As with many disorders affecting the central nervous system, treatment of chronic pain is fraught with difficulties related to specific diagnosis and measures of treatment efficacy. Given the recent advances that brain-imaging techniques have contributed to our understanding of how chronic pain affects multiple aspects of brain function (including sensory, emotional, cognitive, and modulatory), opportunities to use these approaches in the clinic are clearly a focus of research laboratories around the world. The routine application of brain imaging as a clinical marker of disease state or therapeutic (drug) efficacy would significantly enhance the clinical process by providing objective measures for clinicians and patients.Current Pain and Headache Reports 03/2011; 15(3):223-9. · 1.66 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
companion manuscript
cooperative subject
functional imaging modalities
fundamental concepts necessary
individual subjects' own perceptions
intermittent symptoms
negative sensory phenomena
neurologic bedside examination
neuropathic pain
Neuropathic pain disorders
perceptual experience
positive sensory phenomena
quantitative sensory testing
self-reported neuropathic pain symptoms tools
sensory abnormalities
sensory perception
stimulus-evoked negative
stimulus-evoked positive sensory phenomena
test results
yield useful results