Internal medicine residents' comfort with and frequency of providing dietary counseling to diabetic patients.

Institute for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 750 N. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Journal of General Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.42). 08/2009; 24(10):1140-3. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-009-1084-8
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Resident physicians' preparedness to provide dietary counseling for the rising number of diabetic patients is unclear.
To assess the comfort with, frequency of, and perceived effectiveness of diabetic dietary counseling by internal medicine (IM) residents.
Cross-sectional survey.
One hundred eleven IM residents at a single academic institution.
Survey response rate was 94%. Fewer residents (56%) were comfortable with diabetic dietary counseling compared with counseling on symptoms of hypo/hyperglycemia (90%, p < 0.001). Residents less frequently provided diabetic dietary counseling (63%), compared with counseling for medication adherence (87%, p < 0.001). The 28% of residents reporting prior education with chronic disease self-management were more comfortable with diabetic dietary counseling (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.4-7.3, p = 0.006), and reported counseling more frequently, although this difference was not statistically significant (OR 1.8, 95% CI 0.86-3.8, p = 0.12). More frequent counseling was reported by those residents who were more comfortable (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0-2.2, p = 0.03) or felt more effective (OR 3.6, 95% CI 2.1-6.1, p < 0.001) with their diabetic dietary counseling.
Overall, IM residents reported low levels of comfort with and frequency of diabetic dietary counseling. However, residents who were more comfortable or who felt more effective with their dietary counseling counseled more frequently.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Background: Few studies have examined residents' perspectives on the adequacy of women's health (WH) training in internal medicine (IM). This study sought residents' opinions regarding comfort level managing 13 core WH topics, their perceived adequacy of training in these areas, and the frequency with which they managed each topic. The association between reported comfort level and perceived adequacy of training and management frequency was also assessed. Methods: A 67-item questionnaire was administered from April to June 2009 to 100 (64%) of the 156 residents from the traditional, primary care, and IM-pediatrics residency programs at a single institution. Descriptive and correlation statistics were used to examine the relationships between self-reported comfort level, perceived adequacy of training opportunities, and frequency managing WH issues. Data was stratified by sex, IM program, and post-graduate year (PGY). Results: The majority of residents reported low comfort levels managing 7 of 13 topics. Over half of residents perceived limited training opportunities for 11 of 13 topics. With the exception of cardiovascular disease in women, greater than 75% of residents reported managing the 13 topics five or more times in the prior 6 months. Correlation analysis suggested a linear relationship between low comfort levels and limited training opportunities, and between low comfort levels and low frequency managing WH topics (r=0.97 and r=0.89, respectively). Stratified analyses by sex, IM program, and PGY showed no significant differences. Conclusions: Key gaps remain in WH training. Our results emphasize the importance of reinforcing WH training with hands-on management opportunities. Understanding institution-specific strengths and weaknesses may help guide the development of targeted initiatives.
    Journal of Women's Health 08/2013; 22(8):667-72. · 1.90 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite the rising prevalence of diabetes, there is a paucity of diabetes curricula in residency training. The multidisciplinary diabetes team approach is underused in residency education. To assess the feasibility of an innovative multidisciplinary resident diabetes clinic (MRDC) in enhancing (1) resident diabetes knowledge via a Diabetes Awareness Questionnaire, and (2) subsequent process and patient outcomes in patients with diabetes via a Diabetes Practice Behavior Checklist. From October 2008 to February 2010, 14 internal medicine residents managed patients with uncontrolled diabetes in a weekly half-day MRDC for 1 month (total 4-5 half-day sessions/resident), with a collaborative team of internists, diabetes educators, an endocrinologist, and a pharmacist. The curriculum included didactic sessions, required readings, and patient-specific case discussions. A 20-question Diabetes Awareness Questionnaire was administered to each resident prerotation and postrotation. Records of 47 patients with diabetes in the residents' own continuity clinics (not the MRDC) were audited 6 months before and after the MRDC for Diabetes Practice Behavior Checklist measures (glycated hemoglobin, blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, retinal referral, foot exam, microalbumin screen). Pre-MRDC and post-MRDC data were compared via paired t test. The MRDC residents exhibited a modest increase in mean (SD) scores on the Diabetes Awareness Questionnaire (before, 8.2 [2.8]; after, 10.9 [2.8]; P = .02) and a modest mean (SD) performance increase in overall process outcomes from the Diabetes Practice Behavior Checklist (before, 74% [18%]; after, 84% [18%]; P = .004). No improvements occurred in patient outcomes. Multidisciplinary diabetes teaching may be useful in fostering certain resident knowledge and performance measures but may not alter clinical outcomes. Further large-scale, longitudinal studies are needed to understand the effect of our curriculum on residents' diabetes knowledge and future practice behavior.
    Journal of graduate medical education. 03/2013; 5(1):145-149.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The current system of residency training focuses on the hospital setting, and resident exposure to the surrounding community is often limited. However, community interaction can play an important role in ambulatory training and in learning systems-based practice, a residency core competency. The goal of the Neighborhood Health Exchange was to develop a community partnership to provide internal medicine residents with an opportunity to interface with community members through a mutually beneficial educational experience. Internal medicine residents received training during their ambulatory block and participated in a voluntary field practicum designed to engage community members in discussions about their health. Community members participated in education sessions led by resident volunteers. Resident volunteers completed a survey on their experiences. All residents stated that the opportunity to lead an exchange was very useful to their overall residency training. Eight exchanges were held with a total of 61 community participants, who completed a 3-question survey following the session. This survey asked about the level of material, the helpfulness of the exchanges, and opportunities for improvement. We received 46 completed surveys from community members: 91% stated that the material was presented "at the right level" and 93% stated that the presentations were somewhat or very helpful. Eighty percent gave positive and encouraging comments about the exchange. Effective community partnerships involve assessing needs of the stakeholders, anticipating leadership turnover, and adapting the Neighborhood Health Exchange model to different groups. Community outreach can also enhance internal medicine ambulatory training experience, provide residents with patient counseling opportunities, and offer a novel method to enhance resident understanding of systems-based practice, especially within the larger community in which their patients live.
    Journal of graduate medical education. 09/2010; 2(3):456-61.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 20, 2014