Neural Correlates of Developmental Coordination Disorder: A Review of Hypotheses

Faculty of Medicine, Rehabilitation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Journal of child neurology (Impact Factor: 1.67). 09/2009; 24(10):1273-81. DOI: 10.1177/0883073809333537
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Affecting 5% to 6% of school-age children, developmental coordination disorder is characterized by a marked impairment of motor coordination that significantly interferes with activities of daily living and academic achievement. Little is known about the etiology of developmental coordination disorder, but the disorder often coexists with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), speech/language impairment, and/or reading disability. This comprehensive review examines the literature supporting or refuting hypothesized neural correlates of developmental coordination disorder and suggests directions for future research. Potential sources of neuropathology include the cerebellum, parietal lobe, corpus callosum, and basal ganglia. Comorbidities and deficits associated with developmental coordination disorder are highly suggestive of cerebellar dysfunction; yet, given the heterogeneity of this disorder, it is likely that the cerebellum is not the only neural correlate. Neuroimaging studies and behavioral investigations of learning-related change in motor behavior are the next critical step in enhancing our understanding of developmental coordination disorder.

Download full-text


Available from: Cheryl Missiuna, Feb 09, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to examine how feedback, or its absence, affects children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) during a visuo-manual tracking task. This cross-sectional study included 40 children with DCD and 40 typically developing (TD) children between six and ten years old. Participants were required to track a target moving along a circular path presented on a monitor by moving an electronic pen on a digitizing tablet. The task was performed under two visibility conditions (target visible throughout the trajectory and target intermittently occluded) and at two different target velocities (30° and 60° per second). Variables reflecting tracking success and tracking behaviour within the target were compared between groups. Results showed that children with DCD were less proficient in tracking a moving target than TD children. Their performance deteriorated even more when the target was occluded and when the target speed increased. The mean tracking speed of the DCD group exceeded the speed at which the target rotated which was attributed to accelerations and decelerations made during tracking. This suggests that children with DCD have significant difficulties in visuo-manual tracking especially when visual feedback is reduced. It appears that their impaired ability to predict together with impairments in fine-tuning arm movements may be responsible for poor performance in the intermittently occluded visuo-manual tracking task. Copyright © 2014 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Neuroscience 11/2014; 286. DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.11.032 · 3.33 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: When de Ajuriaguerra and Soubiran (1959) define psychomotor disorders as “oscillating between neurology and psychiatry” they provide both an overall frame of reflection and a word of caution against reductionism which besieges the clinician. Psychomotor disorders in children are composed of different semiological components of a variety of natures: perceptual, cognitive, motor, emotional and relational. The semiological tripod, as Corraze (1999, 2010) names it, specifies the essential traits of these disorders: 1) they are perceptual-motor disorders affecting the exploration, action and communication functions as well as emotional integration; 2) they occur in the form of soft neurological signs which reflect a minimal brain dysfunction; 3) they are associated with a psychopathological complex. The etiological plurality requires, as Ajuriaguerra expected, an analysis of different dimensions: biological, ecological and teleological or intentional. Dynamic systems and self-organization theories consider motricity as an emergent property of the perceptual-motor system, that is the result of interactions between components of the neuro-musculoskeletal system and global constraints (environmental, cognitive and psychological) on these components. The psychomotor disorder is seen as a solution used by the subject in his interaction with both physical and social environments when he faces a task or situation requiring the use of coping mechanisms. These theories provide the opportunity to resurrect a heritage that puts the emphasis on a holistic view of the individual patient while avoiding neurological, psychological, psychiatric or social reductionisms.
    01/2013; 4(13):3-11. DOI:10.3917/devel.014.0004
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Poor handwriting is a core deficit in Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD). In a previous study, we compared the evolution of cursive letters handwriting in a girl with DCD throughout her second-grade year with that of typically developing (TD) children. We found that her handwriting evolved much less than that of TD children and remained similar to that of pre-schoolers at all stages, suggesting that her handwriting skills have reached a steady state level. We present here a continuation of this work, in which we focused on the velocity aspects of handwriting in another French child with DCD. Indeed, different velocity patterns have been observed in Chinese and English children with DCD. In the French cursive style of writing, consecutive letters are joined, a major difference with the English script style of writing. We thus analyzed the handwriting of a second-grade French girl with DCD, not only for isolated letters but also for syllables and words, in comparison to that of TD first-graders (6-7 years old; N = 85) and second-graders (7-8 years old; N = 88). Each written track was digitized, and nine kinematic parameters were measured to evaluate writing fluency. Results showed that the productions of the child with DCD were more similar to those of first-graders than to those of second-graders. In line with our previous study, the most discriminative parameters between the child with DCD and TD children were size and mean speed. Moreover, her handwriting was less fluent than that of TD children. In contrast to previous observations, we observed a higher writing velocity of the child with DCD when compared to TD children, whatever the complexity of the item, and no significant difference with TD children in the pausing time during writing. These differences may reflect linguistic specificities. For syllables and words, each letter was treated separately as a single unit, thus reflecting a problem in anticipation and automation.
    Frontiers in Psychology 01/2013; 4:1022. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.01022 · 2.80 Impact Factor