Article

A novel rapid and effective donor arm disinfection method.

National Bacteriology Laboratory, NHS Blood and Transplant, London, UK.
Transfusion (Impact Factor: 3.53). 09/2009; 50(1):53-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02332.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of the study was to derive a donor arm disinfection technique that was rapid, but with a disinfection efficacy equivalent to a previous "best-practice" technique. This method consisted of a two-stage procedure with an initial application of 70% isopropyl alcohol and then 2% tincture of iodine (IATI). The total time for the IATI method was 2 minutes in duration. A rapid technique (1 min in duration) was needed to obviate potential problems due to increased donor waiting time, had the IATI method been implemented at blood donation sessions.
A direct swabbing and plating technique was used to enumerate bacteria present before and after disinfection. In total, seven methods were evaluated.
The chlorhexidine/alcohol applicator (CAA) disinfection device containing 1.5 mL of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol (99.91% reduction; confidence limits, 99.55%, 99.98%) was shown to have equivalent disinfection efficacy as the IATI method (99.89% reduction; confidence limits, 99.36%, 99.98%; p = 0.86). Procedural time for the 1.5-mL CAA method was 1 minute thereby avoiding potential problems of increased donor waiting time, inherent in the IATI 2-minute procedure at blood donation sessions.
The 1.5-mL CAA disinfection method offers blood services a rapid and effective donor arm disinfection procedure. In 2006, the 1.5-mL CAA procedure was implemented throughout the entire English blood service for all donations.

3 Bookmarks
 · 
360 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The study of the dose-response relationship of disinfectants is of great importance in treating infection, the objective being to use concentrations above the minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC). Below these concentrations, the bacteriostatic or bactericidal effect may be insufficient. Moreover, at low concentrations, a hormetic effect may be observed, producing a stimulation of growth instead of inhibitory action. Hormesis is not well known in the context of antimicrobial substances. This study investigates the possible existence of a hormetic effect in three commonly used antiseptics-chlorhexidine digluconate, povidone iodine and benzalkonium chloride-on strains of reference of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Growth curves were determined for different concentrations of the disinfectants. The variables studied-concentration of disinfectant, instantaneous growth rate and number of generations-were analysed using linear, quadratic and cubic models to adjust for the variables. The three disinfectants tested show a significant hormetic effect with P. aeruginosa and a less significant effect with S. aureus. These findings point to a dose-response effect that is not linear at low concentrations, while hormetic effects observed at some low concentrations result in greater bacterial growth. In infected wounds, materials or surfaces where microorganisms may occupy zones of difficult access for a disinfectant, the hormetic effect may have important consequences.
    European Journal of Clinical Microbiology 07/2013; · 3.02 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bacterial contamination of platelet components (PC) is the most prevalent risk for transfusion-transmitted infection. Based on the recent studies with optimal culture methods of expired PC, the prevalence of bacterial contamination is estimated to occur in approximately one in 750 to one in 1000 PC. Only within the last few years have the magnitude of the risks and the range of clinical outcomes associated with bacterial contamination been extensively characterized. Despite increased recognition of bacterial contamination of PC, transfusion-related sepsis is infrequently reported. This has largely been attributed to passive reporting systems, and low levels of clinical awareness for transfusion-related sepsis by primary care physicians. The risk for transfusion of contaminated PC has generally been characterized per component. Importantly, because patients require repeated transfusions of PC during a period of transfusion-dependent thrombocytopenia, it is appropriate to express the risk to receive a contaminated PC on a patient exposure basis. Assuming that the average hematology oncology patient may receive seven PC during a 28-day period of support, the risk of exposure to a contaminated PC is in the range of one in 150 per patient. This level of risk would not be acceptable for other intravenous medications. With increased appreciation of the risk of bacterial contamination, methods were developed to limit the risk of transfusion-transmitted bacteremia. This article focuses on those interventions that have been implemented in routine practice. The most important methods employed to mitigate the risk are improved skin disinfection, initial blood draw diversion, bacterial detection and pathogen inactivation/reduction. These technologies are now undergoing increased use in the clinical practice of transfusion medicine. With increased use, additional data are being generated to more fully characterize the effects of these interventions. Improved disinfection, blood diversion and bacterial detection have decreased, but not resolved the risk of bacterial contamination. Pathogen inactivation/reduction offers the potential for a further substantial decrease of the risk for transfusion of PC contaminated with bacteria.
    Expert Review of Hematology 10/2011; 4(5):509-25. · 2.38 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bacterial contamination of blood components, primarily platelet concentrates (PCs), has been identified as one of the most frequent infectious complications in transfusion practice. PC units have a high risk for bacterial growth/multiplication due to their storage at ambient temperature (20 +/- 2 degrees C). Consequences of blood contamination could be effectively prevented or reduced by pathogen inactivation systems. The aim of this study was to determine the Mirasol pathogen reduction technology (PRT) system efficacy in PCs using an artificial bacteria-contamination model. According to the ABO blood groups, PC units (n = 216) were pooled into 54 pools (PC-Ps). PC-Ps were divided into three equal groups, with 18 units in each, designed for an artificial bacteria-contamination. Briefly, PC-Ps were contaminated by Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus or Escherichia coli in concentrations 10(2) to 10(7) colony forming units (CFU) per unit. Afterward, PC-Ps were underwent to inactivation by Mirasol PRT system, using UV (lambda = 265-370 nm) activated riboflavin (RB). All PC-Ps were assayed by BacT/Alert Microbial Detection System for CFU quantification before and after the Mirasol treatment. Samples from non-inactivated PC-P units were tested after preparation and immediately following bacterial contamination. Samples from Mirasol treated units were quantified for CFUs one hour, 3 days and 5 days after inactivation. Results. A complete inactivation of all bacteria species was obtained at CFU concentrations of 10(2) and 10(3) per PC-P unit through storage/investigation period. The most effective inactivation (10(5) CFU per PC-P unit) was obtained in Escherichia coli setting. Contrary, inactivation of all the three tested bacteria species was unworkable in concentrations of > or = 10(6) CFU per PC-P unit. Efficient inactivation of investigated bacteria types with a significant CFU depletion in PC-P units was obtained--3 Log for all three tested species, and 5 Log for Escherichia coli. The safety of blood component therapy, primarily the clinical use of PCs can be improved using the Mirasol PRT system.
    Vojnosanitetski pregled. Military-medical and pharmaceutical review 12/2011; 68(12):1041-6. · 0.21 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
10 Downloads