Assessment of myocardial blood flow (MBF) in humans using arterial spin labeling (ASL): feasibility and noise analysis.

Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-2564, USA.
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.27). 09/2009; 62(4):975-83. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22088
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Arterial spin labeling (ASL) is a powerful tool for the quantitative measurement of tissue blood flow, and has been extensively applied to the brain, lungs, and kidneys. ASL has been recently applied to myocardial blood flow (MBF) measurement in small animals; however, its use in humans is limited by inadequate signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) efficiency and timing restrictions related to cardiac motion. We present preliminary results demonstrating MBF measurement in humans, using cardiac-gated flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) tagging and balanced steady-state free precession (SSFP) imaging at 3T, and present an analysis of thermal and physiological noise and their impact on MBF measurement error. Measured MBF values in healthy volunteers were 1.36 +/- 0.40 ml/ml/min at rest, matching the published literature based on quantitative (13)N-ammonia positron emission tomography (PET), and increased by 30% and 29% with passive leg elevation and isometric handgrip stress, respectively. With thermal noise alone, MBF can be quantified to within +/- 0.1 ml/ml/min with 85.5% confidence, for 3.09 cm(3) regions averaged over 6 breath-holds. This study demonstrates the feasibility of quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow in humans using ASL, and identifies SNR improvement and the reduction of physiological noise as key areas for future development.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: : Background Myocardial arterial spin labeling (ASL) is a noninvasive MRI based technique that is capable of measuring myocardial blood flow (MBF) in humans. It suffers from poor sensitivity to MBF due to high physiological noise (PN). This study aims to determine if the sensitivity of myocardial ASL to MBF can be improved by reducing image acquisition time, via parallel imaging. Methods Myocardial ASL scans were performed in 7 healthy subjects at rest using flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) tagging and balanced steady state free precession (SSFP) imaging. Sensitivity encoding (SENSE) with a reduction factor of 2 was used to shorten each image acquisition from roughly 300 ms per heartbeat to roughly 150 ms per heartbeat. A paired Student’s t-test was performed to compare measurements of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and physiological noise (PN) from the reference and accelerated methods. Results The measured PN (mean ± standard deviation) was 0.20 ± 0.08 ml/g/min for the reference method and 0.08 ± 0.05 ml/g/min for the accelerated method, corresponding to a 60% reduction. PN measured from the accelerated method was found to be significantly lower than that of the reference method (p = 0.0059). There was no significant difference between MBF measured from the accelerated and reference ASL methods (p = 0.7297). Conclusions In this study, significant PN reduction was achieved by shortening the acquisition window using parallel imaging with no significant impact on the measured MBF. This indicates an improvement in sensitivity to MBF and may also enable the imaging of subjects with higher heart rates and imaging during systole.
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 01/2014; 16(1):15. · 4.44 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This review will explore the interface between MRI, cardiovascular research, and animal models, with particular attention to values, limitations, and best practices. This includes the question of whether an animal model may be necessary or appropriate. Factors influencing the selection of small versus large animal models will be considered, including the features that distinguish mice from other animal models. MRI has proven extremely useful in studies of basic cardiovascular physiology, but its true utility lies in the acquisition of end points relevant to cardiovascular disease in preclinical and clinical investigations. Brief summaries will be presented of the many anatomic and functional parameters that can be assessed by cardiovascular MRI, along with its role in translational medicine. Finally, the predictive value and clinical relevance of animal models of cardiovascular disease will be explored, including steps that are recommended to maximize the predictive value of animal models in translational medicine.
    Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports 5(2).
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Rapid magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the heart, during the first pass of an injected contrast bolus is routinely used to detect hypoperfused myocardium, both at rest, and during vasodilator stress. Adapting this approach for quantitative perfusion imaging has been successfully tested and validated over more than 15 years in experimental models and clinical studies, yielding quantitative estimates of the perfusion reserve to detect epicardial stenoses and microvascular dysfunction, and to quantify absolute myocardial blood flow (in mL/minute/g of myocardial tissue). This review presents an overview of the most common approaches used in contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI for quantification of myocardial perfusion, and identifies some critical areas of current research. In its present state, cardiac MRI is a viable, diagnostically valuable alternative to other cardiac imaging modalities for the quantification of myocardial perfusion.
    Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports 5(3).

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 10, 2014