Article

Electrophysiologic facial nerve monitoring during parotidectomy

Division of Head and Neck and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Head & Neck (Impact Factor: 3.01). 01/2009; 32(3):399-405. DOI: 10.1002/hed.21190
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Facial nerve monitoring is an adjunctive method available to a surgeon during parotid surgery to assist with the functional preservation of the facial nerve. This review describes the goals, applications, technique, and benefits of electrophysiologic facial nerve monitoring during parotid surgery. A review and analysis of the relevant medical literature related to electrophysiologic facial nerve monitoring during parotid surgery are included.

Full-text

Available from: Lisa A Orloff, Apr 26, 2015
2 Followers
 · 
386 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To systematically review the literature to assess the efficacy of corticosteroids in treating post-parotidectomy facial nerve palsy (FNP). We searched the Cochrane library, EMBASE and MEDLINE (from inception to 2014) for studies assessing the use of corticosteroids in post-parotidectomy FNP. Studies were assessed for inclusion and quality. Data was extracted from included studies. Two randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. One study assessed the use of dexamethasone and the other prednisolone. None of the studies demonstrated a significant difference in the outcome of FNP post-parotidectomy with the use of corticosteroids vs no therapy. The majority of FNP post-parotidectomy is transient. Preoperative factors (size of tumour and malignancy), intraoperative factors (extent of parotidectomy and integrity of facial nerve at the end of the operation) are important in determining prognosis of FNP if it does occur. Corticosteroids do not appear to improve FNP prognosis post-parotidectomy. Further studies assessing patients by cohort and with long term follow-up are required to increase scientific evidence.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Surgical treatment of benign parotid tumors has been debated for decades. Extracapsular dissection (ECD) differs markedly from classic surgical approaches to the parotid neoplasm because facial nerve dissection is not performed. ECD, its advantages, disadvantages, indications, and contra-indications for benign tumors with an emphasis on benign mixed tumor will be comprehensively explored in this chapter. Factors noted to favor this approach include mobility of the tumor within the gland, a thin covering of capsule and glandular tissue, and a tumor large enough to allow digital manipulation during dissection. Imaging, fine needle aspiration cytology, and neuro-monitoring play a heightened role in ECD. Recurrence and permanent facial nerve dysfunction with ECD are not higher in high volume centers performed by experienced surgeons. Transient facial nerve dysfunction, Frey’s syndrome, sensory deficits, and sialocele are lower with ECD. Devastating adverse outcomes of permanent facial nerve dysfunction and recurrence should be considered by the occasional and inexperienced parotid surgeon.
    06/2014; 2(2):55-63. DOI:10.1007/s40136-014-0045-x
  • Source