Accuracy of postoperative end-tidal Pco2 measurements with mainstream and sidestream capnography in non-obese patients and in obese patients with and without obstructive sleep apnea.

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Louisville, USA.
Anesthesiology (Impact Factor: 5.88). 09/2009; 111(3):609-15. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b060b6
Source: PubMed


Obtaining accurate end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure measurements via nasal cannula poses difficulties in postanesthesia patients who are mouth breathers, including those who are obese and those with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); a nasal cannula with an oral guide may improve measurement accuracy in these patients. The authors evaluated the accuracy of a mainstream capnometer with an oral guide nasal cannula and a sidestream capnometer with a nasal cannula that did or did not incorporate an oral guide in spontaneously breathing non-obese patients and obese patients with and without OSA during recovery from general anesthesia.
The study enrolled 20 non-obese patients (body mass index less than 30 kg/m) without OSA, 20 obese patients (body mass index greater than 35 kg/m) without OSA, and 20 obese patients with OSA. End-tidal carbon dioxide pressure was measured by using three capnometer/cannula combinations (oxygen at 4 l/min): (1) a mainstream capnometer with oral guide nasal cannula, (2) a sidestream capnometer with a nasal cannula that included an oral guide, and (3) a sidestream capnometer with a standard nasal cannula. Arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure was determined simultaneously. The major outcome was the arterial-to-end-tidal partial pressure difference with each combination.
In non-obese patients, arterial-to-end-tidal pressure difference was 3.0 +/- 2.6 (mean +/- SD) mmHg with the mainstream capnometer, 4.9 +/- 2.3 mmHg with the sidestream capnometer and oral guide cannula, and 7.1 +/- 3.5 mmHg with the sidestream capnometer and a standard cannula (P < 0.05). In obese non-OSA patients, it was 3.9 +/- 2.6 mmHg, 6.4 +/- 3.1 mmHg, and 8.1 +/- 5.0 mmHg, respectively (P < 0.05). In obese OSA patients, it was 4.0 +/- 3.1 mmHg, 6.3 +/- 3.2 mmHg, and 8.3 +/- 4.6 mmHg, respectively (P < 0.05).
Mainstream capnometry performed best, and an oral guide improved the performance of sidestream capnometry. Accuracy in non-obese and obese patients, with and without OSA, was similar.

Download full-text


Available from: Ozan Akca, May 05, 2014
  • Source
    • "In their study, comparing the mainstream and sidestream methods in patients admitted to the postanesthesia care unit, Kasuya et al [16] measured the mean difference of ETCO 2 / PaCO 2 as 3.5 ± 2.6 by mainstream method, which was increased to 7.3 ± 3.5 with sidestream method. This result showing better correlation of ETCO 2 and PaCO 2 with mainstream method supports our study, which is in contrast with previous studies. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study was designed to determine whether the mainstream end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) measurement can accurately predict the partial arterial carbon dioxide (Paco2) level of patients presented to emergency department (ED) with acute dyspnea. This prospective, observational study was conducted at a university hospital ED, which serves more than 110 000 patients annually. Nonintubated adult patients presented with acute dyspnea who required arterial blood gas analysis were recruited in the study for a 6-month period between January and July 2010. Patients were asked to breathe through an airway adapter attached to the mainstream capnometer. Arterial blood gas samples were obtained simultaneously. We included 162 patients during the study period. The mean ETCO2 level was 39.47 ± 10.84 mm Hg (minimum, 19 mm Hg; maximum, 82 mm Hg), and mean Paco2 level was 38.95 ± 12.27 mm Hg (minimum, 16 mm Hg; maximum, 94 mm Hg). There was a positive, strong, statistically significant correlation between ETCO2 and Paco2 (r = 0.911, P < .001). The Bland-Altman plot shows the mean bias ± SD between ETCO2 and Paco2 as 0.5 ± 5 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, -1.3165-0.2680) and the limits of agreement as -10.5 and +9.5 mm Hg. Eighty percent (n = 129) of the ETCO2 measurements were between the range of ±5 mm Hg. Mainstream ETCO2 measurement accurately predicts the arterial Paco2 of patients presented to ED with acute dyspnea. Further studies comparing mainstream and sidestream methods in these patients are required.
    The American journal of emergency medicine 11/2011; 30(2):358-61. DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2010.12.014 · 1.27 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper some criteria for testing model structures are used for choosing the best among a set of rival dynamical models of two metabolic processes. The considered criteria are based on the residual sum of squares, the final prediction error, the Akaike information criterion and the inverse of the information matrix. Linear time invariant structured models and input-output descriptions are proposed for the two considered metabolic processes, riphamicin and bilirubin kinetics, and maximum likelihood parameter estimates are obtained from input-output test data. A combined use of the Akaike criterion (or final prediction error) and of the inverse of the information matrix proved to be a very reliable tool in the metabolic model structure determination.
    Decision and Control including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes, 1979 18th IEEE Conference on; 01/1980
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper deals with a design of a digital servo controller for a robot manipulator with mechanical nonlinearities. The experimental system is a D.C. motor driven manipulator arm. A model to predict the nonlinear behavior exhibited by the experimental system and a nonlinear controller with Coulomb friction compensator are developed and tested. The effectiveness of the nonlinear controller is certified by designing a linear tracking controller based on this scheme. Experimental and simulated responses are given.
    Robotics and Automation. Proceedings. 1986 IEEE International Conference on; 05/1986
Show more