Vision loss associated with the use and removal of intraocular silicone oil

Texas Retina Associates, 1001 North Waldrop Dr Suite 512, Arlington, TX, USA.
Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) 01/2009; 2(4):955-9.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To describe vision loss associated with the use or removal of silicone oil retinal tamponade.
Records were reviewed of all patients with a decrease in visual acuity of at least 3 Snellen lines from best acuity with 5000 centistoke silicone oil in place or after removal of silicone oil at a single retina-only practice between 1996 and 2006.
Nine patients (6 men, 3 women) with a mean age of 48 years (range, 16-61) met study inclusion criteria. Seven patients lost at least three Snellen lines of vision while the silicone oil was in place. Four patients had late modest improvements in acuity when compared to their final recorded Snellen vision before silicone oil removal, however no patients exhibited visual improvement when comparing their final recorded visual acuities after oil removal with best recorded acuities under oil tamponade. Loss of the foveal depression was a consistent feature on optical coherence tomography.
Vision loss is a possible complication of silicone oil use and removal. Late visual improvement may occur in some patients. Further research is warranted to elucidate the mechanism(s) of vision loss associated with the use or removal of silicone oil.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Here we report a case of unexplained sudden visual loss after removal of silicone oil for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. A patient with visual loss in one eye after removal of silicone oil was investigated with best-corrected Snellen visual acuity assessment, fundus biomicroscopy, optical coherence tomography, color fundus photograph, fluorescein angiography, electrophysiologic examination, automated perimetry, and visual evoked poten- tials. Best-corrected Snellen visual acuity was 20/30 while the silicone oil was in place. Visual acuity dropped dramatically to 20/200 after silicone oil removal. No other complications asso- ciated with oil removal were noted. The retina remained attached. Visual evoked potentials revealed decreased amplitude due to a damaged optic nerve, while the earliest central visual field defects disappeared unexpectedly almost 2 years after the last surgical procedure. No other abnormalities were demonstrated. Vision loss is a possible complication of silicone oil and removal. This case was distinguished by the permanent decrease of visual acuity despite the unexplained and quite complete recovery of the foveal threshold with no other relevant visual field defects.
    Clinical Ophthalmology 09/2014; 2014(8):1831-1836. DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S67760 · 0.76 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Silicone oil (SiO) has a well-established role as a long-term endotamponade agent in the management of complicated retinal detachments. Complications of intraocular SiO include keratopathy, glaucoma, cataract and subretinal migration of the oil droplets. SiO tamponade can also lead to a severe optic neuropathy caused by retrolaminar migration. Nevertheless, intracranial migration of the SiO through the optic nerve posterior to the lamina cribrosa to the optic chiasm and brain is uncommon. The mechanism is still under debate, but it has been suggested elevated intraocular pressure, macrophages or optic nerve head anatomical predispositions as potential explanations. Moreover, central scotoma may develop in eyes with SiO not only at the time of oil removal, but also during the period of tamponade. We performed a PubMed search of neuronal complications of silicone oil over a period of 25 years. This review summarizes our current understanding of the specific pathogenic mechanisms of intraocular SiO neuronal side effects, concluding that pre-existing glaucoma and optic nerve abnormalities are the main risk factors associated with this damage. In their absence, the risk of extraocular SiO penetration is so low that the use of SiO endotamponade in complex retinal detachment patients does not need to be modified. MRI images to assess extraocular SiO migration are only necessary in very few and special cases, such as patients with optic nerve abnormalities and glaucoma.
    Acta ophthalmologica 06/2013; 92(3). DOI:10.1111/aos.12212 · 2.51 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A giant retinal tear (GRT) is a full-thickness neurosensory retinal break that extends circumferentially around the retina for three or more clock hours in the presence of a posteriorly detached vitreous. Its incidence in large population-based studies has been estimated as 1.5% of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments, with a significant male preponderance, and bilaterality in 12.8%. Most GRTs are idiopathic, with trauma, hereditary vitreoretinopathies and high myopia each being causative in decreasing frequency. The vast majority of GRTs are currently managed with a pars plana vitrectomy; the use of adjunctive circumferential scleral buckling is debated, but no studies have shown a clear anatomical or visual advantage with its use. Similarly, silicone oil tamponade does not influence long-term outcomes when compared with gas. Primary and final retinal reattachment rates are achieved in 88% and 95% of patients, respectively. Even when the retina remains attached, however, visual recovery may be limited. Furthermore, fellow eyes of patients with a GRT are at higher risk of developing retinal tears and retinal detachment. Prophylactic treatment under these circumstances may be considered but there is no firm evidence of its efficacy at the present time.
    Survey of Ophthalmology 10/2013; 59(2). DOI:10.1016/j.survophthal.2013.03.006 · 3.51 Impact Factor