A randomized trial examining differential meal replacement adherence in a weight loss maintenance program after one-year follow-up

Fordham University, Department of Psychology, Bronx, NY 10458, USA.
Eating behaviors 09/2009; 10(3):176-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2009.05.003
Source: PubMed


The purpose of the present study was to examine the relationship between patterns of meal replacement (MR) adherence and changes in outcomes during a behaviorally-oriented weight loss program. Data from the present study are based on sixty female participants (age: 29-62 years, BMI: 27.99-37.50 kg/m(2)). Participants were randomized into either a control or experimental condition, which tested the use of MRs during weight loss maintenance. Outcome measures included body weight, depression, physical activity, cognitive restraint, disinhibition, hunger, and binge eating collected at four assessment points. Within the experimental condition, we further examined adherence to MRs and its relationship with the outcome measures. We found evidence of differences at baseline on some measures (e.g., weight, physical activity and depression) while on others (cognitive restraint, disinhibition, and hunger), differences that emerged over the course of treatment. Further research is necessary to determine if there are measures associated with successful MR use that can be detected at baseline and if MR adherence itself leads to changes in eating behavior.

Download full-text


Available from: C. Alix Timko,
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Induction and maintenance of a period of negative energy balance are required for overweight and obese subjects to lose weight. Meal replacements, particularly in beverage form, have now evolved as part of the "toolbox" used by researchers and clinicians to achieve negative energy balance. This overview traces the historical development of beverage meal replacements, reviews key studies supporting their clinical efficacy, and examines concerns related to their safe use. This collective information supports the view that meal replacements, particularly in beverage form, are now an effective and safe component for use in the clinical setting. Further studies are needed to identify those subjects most likely to benefit from use of meal replacements as part of their comprehensive weight control program.
    Physiology & Behavior 02/2010; 100(1):90-4. DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.02.010 · 2.98 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: El presente consenso […] tiene el objetivo de examinar los datos científicos publicados hasta el momento actual sobre la eficacia, las ventajas y los inconvenientes de los diferentes enfoques nutricionales que se han ensayado en la prevención y el tratamiento de la obesidad. Con el resultado de esta revisión pretendemos ofrecer una herramienta que sea útil al profesional que ha de pautar una dieta para el tratamiento de un paciente obeso, o que tiene que diseñar estrategias nutricionales de prevención de la obesidad. http://www.grep-aedn.es/documentos/ObesidadFesnadSeedo2011.pdf
    Endocrinología y Nutrición 01/2011; 9(7):1-78. DOI:10.1016/j.endonu.2012.05.004
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: High-protein liquid meal replacements have proven to be effective in reducing caloric intake and body weight. Recently, substituting high fiber breakfast cereals for the more expensive high-protein drinks has been found to be equally effective to reduce weight. The following study tested the hypothesis that the mechanism responsible for the reduced intake was not the dietary composition of the meal replacement, but the controlled portion sized meals. Seventeen volunteers ate all of their meals and snacks from foods provided by the research unit from Monday to Friday for five consecutive weeks. For the first week, all participants selected their food from a buffet where each food was weighed before and after eating. For the next two weeks, half of the group selected their lunch by choosing one food from a selection of six commercially available portion controlled foods. They could eat as much as they wished at other meals or snacks. For final weeks four and five, the conditions were reversed for the two groups. Consuming the portion controlled lunches resulted in about a 250 kcal reduction in energy intake. More importantly, no sign of caloric compensation was evident across the 10 days of testing, an observation substantiated by a significant loss of body weight. The results suggest that the mere substitution of one smaller portioned meal each day is sufficient to cause reduction in daily energy intake and a significant amount of weight.
    Appetite 05/2011; 57(2):311-7. DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2011.04.015 · 2.69 Impact Factor
Show more