Article

Mental Health Service Use During the Transition to Adulthood for Adolescents Reported to the Child Welfare System

Survey Research Division, RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Rd., P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194, USA.
Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) (Impact Factor: 2.81). 09/2009; 60(8):1084-91. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.60.8.1084
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study analyzed patterns of outpatient mental health service use from adolescence into early adulthood among young adults who were reported as victims of maltreatment in adolescence.
Data were from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being, a national probability study of children for whom maltreatment was investigated by the child welfare system. The sample consisted of 616 young adults aged 12 to 15 at baseline. Analysis used descriptive statistics to determine need for and use of outpatient mental health services across time. Logistic regression was used to examine predictors of use of outpatient mental health services in young adulthood.
Almost half of the young adults in this sample had one or more indicators of mental health problems. There was a significant decrease in use of specialty mental health services from adolescence to young adulthood, declining from 47.6% at baseline, to 14.3% at the five- to six- year follow-up. Among young adults with mental health problems, less than a quarter used outpatient mental health services. Logistic regression results indicated that having mental health problems, having Medicaid, and being white were positively associated with use of outpatient mental health services in young adulthood.
Mental health problems were prevalent among young adults who were suspected of being maltreated when they were adolescents, but only about a quarter of those in need used outpatient mental health services. Interventions to improve access to outpatient mental health services for this vulnerable population should particularly support outreach and engagement of young adults who are uninsured and from racial or ethnic minority groups with a history of involvement with the child welfare system in order to meet their unique developmental needs.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
110 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examined illicit substance use among 1,004 adolescents age 11-15, involved with the Child Welfare System (CWS) and followed from 1999 to 2007 as part of the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW). NSCAW is a nationally representative, longitudinal study of the well-being of children aged 15 or younger who have had contact with the CWS. Time points were baseline/investigation, 12 months, 18 months, 3 years, and 5-7 years. In addition to cross-sectional exploration of rates of illicit substance use across adolescence, trajectories of substance use and predictors of these trajectories were examined using longitudinal growth models (LGM). Rates of 30-day illicit drug use were 13.1% at baseline, 18.1% at 18 months, and 20.6% at 36 months. Older adolescents at each wave were more likely to use illicit drugs than younger adolescents. At Wave 5, more than a quarter of young adults (26.3%) had used marijuana, 25.4% used hard drugs (cocaine, LSD, heroin, club drugs), and 12.8% used a prescription medication for recreational purposes. Overall, by wave 5, 62.5% of youth had used an illicit drug. Five trajectory groups were observed: Experimental users (31.1%); Regular users (15.3%); New users (10.9%); and Substance Dependent (5.3%). Predictors of regular use during adolescence were: having a prior CWS report, externalizing behavior problems, delinquency, and any sexual experience. Exposure to physical abuse was predictive of escalating substance use trajectories. Protective factors included having a child at any point during the study, parental monitoring, and being placed in kinship care.
    139st APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition 2011; 10/2011
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Efforts to understand and respond to racial and ethnic disparities in referrals to and use of mental health services among children involved in the child welfare system are constrained by the lack of consistency in defining and measuring disparities and the lack of clarity as to what causal mechanisms sustain patterns of disparate treatment. Recent developments in the field of public health offer some insight as to how our understanding of similar disparities in child welfare may be advanced. Despite advancements, there is still an insufficient knowledge base from which to offer an alternative definition of disparities that illuminates conceptual and methodological innovation in child welfare research. Based on a critical review of the literature, more exploratory and etiological research grounded in implementation of advanced metrics and multivariate methods is warranted to generate a clear definition. Recommendations are offered to address conceptual ambiguity.
    Children and Youth Services Review 10/2013; 35(10):1727-1733. DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.07.013 · 1.27 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The use of trauma-informed practices in the child welfare system is critically important to prevent system-induced trauma and encourage timely assessment, triage and referral for care when indicated. Ultimately, such measures have the potential over time to decrease the risk for mental health problems in children exposed to a trauma. This study evaluates an initiative in Arkansas to train child welfare front-line staff members in trauma-informed care practices. We evaluated the impact of the training on knowledge and use of trauma-informed care practices among three types of child welfare staff (Caseworkers, Program Assistants and Other front-line staff). Results suggest that this training process was highly successful in improving knowledge of trauma-informed care practices, especially among staff with the least formal education and training. We also found a significant increase in staff use of trauma-informed care practices at the three-month follow-up with little difference observed across staff groups. Barriers that may prevent staff from full implementation of training concepts are described and strategies to address barriers are proposed.
    Children and Youth Services Review 11/2013; 35(11):1830-1835. DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.08.013 · 1.27 Impact Factor