Benefits of napping in healthy adults: Rmpact of nap length, time of day, age, and experience with napping

Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario L2S 3A1, Canada.
Journal of Sleep Research (Impact Factor: 3.35). 07/2009; 18(2):272-81. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2008.00718.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Napping is a cross-cultural phenomenon which occurs across the lifespan. People vary widely in the frequency with which they nap as well as the improvements in alertness and well-being experienced. The systematic study of daytime napping is important to understand the benefits in alertness and performance that may be accrued from napping. This review paper investigates factors that affect the benefits of napping such as duration and temporal placement of the nap. In addition, the influence of subject characteristics such as age and experience with napping is examined. The focus of the review is on benefits for healthy individuals with regular sleep/wake schedules rather than for people with sleep or medical disorders. The goal of the review is to summarize the type of performance improvements that result from napping, critique the existing studies, and make recommendations for future research.

35 Reads
  • Source
    • "Neuroscience advocates midday napping for the following cases: (a) response to sleep loss, i.e. replacement napping (Waterhouse et al. 2007; Faraut et al. 2011); (b) in preparation for sleep loss, i.e. prophylactic napping (Jackson and Moreton 2013); or (c) simply nap for relaxation, i.e. appetitive napping (Mednick 2013). Even for individuals who, generally, get good sleep on a nightly basis, napping still may lead to considerable benefits in terms of mood, alertness, and cognitive performance (Milner and Cote 2009). Besides, in healthy and rested subjects, midday napping enhances memory tasks performance (Mednick et al. 2002; Mednick et al. 2003; Tucker et al. 2006; Nishida and Walker 2007; Mednick et al. 2008; Cai et al. 2009; Wamsley et al. 2010a; Payne and Kensinger 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Napping/siesta during the day is a phenomenon, which is widely practised in the world. However, the timing, frequency, and duration may vary. The basis of napping is also diverse, but it is mainly done for improvement in alertness and general well-being. Neuroscience reveals that midday napping improves memory, enhances alertness, boosts wakefulness and performance, and recovers certain qualities of lost night sleep. Interestingly, Islam, the religion of the Muslims, advocates midday napping primarily because it was a practice preferred by Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). The objectives of this review were to investigate and compare identical key points on focused topic from both neuroscientific and Islamic perspectives and make recommendations for future researches.
    Journal of Religion and Health 08/2015; DOI:10.1007/s10943-015-0093-7 · 1.02 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "To the best of our knowledge, the WS has yet to be validated for daytime sleep (naps). Although few studies have investigated differences between daytime and nocturnal sleep architecture (Milner & Cote, 2009), daytime sleep is known to have increased wakefulness and stage 1 sleep (15% vs. 2%; Nishida & Walker, 2007; Payne et al., 2009; Wamsley, Tucker, Payne, Benavides, & Stickgold, 2010; Wamsley, Tucker, Payne, & Stickgold, 2010), and lower sleep efficiency than nocturnal sleep. Decreased sleep efficiency (SE) during daytime naps (e.g., between 68% and 77% SE; Kanady, Drummond, & Mednick, 2011; Nishida & Walker, 2007; Tucker et al., 2006) is mainly due to the " weight " of sleep onset latency in a short sleep period. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An automated wireless system (WS) for sleep monitoring was recently developed and validated for assessing nighttime sleep. Here, we aimed to evaluate the validity of the WS to correctly monitor daytime sleep during naps compared to polysomnography (PSG). We found that the WS underestimated wake, sleep onset latency, wake after sleep onset, and overestimated total sleep time, sleep efficiency and duration of REM sleep. Sensitivity was moderate for wake (58.51%) and light sleep (66.92%) and strong for deep sleep (83.46%) and REM sleep (82.12%). These results demonstrated that the WS had a low ability to detect wake and systematically over-scored REM sleep, implicating the WS as an inadequate substitute for PSG in diagnosing sleep disorders or for research in which sleep staging is essential.
    Behavioral Sleep Medicine 02/2015; 13(2):157-168. DOI:10.1080/15402002.2013.845782 · 2.34 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "As expected for the general adult population [19], our study showed that 92% of the subjects had a monophasic pattern. The monophasic sleep pattern remains during adulthood , except in some societies that have the habit of napping after lunch [20]. Several factors could determine the ideal total sleep duration, if it can be achieved with a single sleep episode (monophasic pattern) or with more than one (biphasic or polyphasic). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the present study was to characterize the temporal patterns of sleep and wakefulness in a sample of the adult subjects from São Paulo city. All subjects filled the Morningness/Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) and wore an actigraph for at least three consecutive days. A total of 359 subjects were considered for the analyses. The mean age was 43±14 years, the mean body mass index was 26.7±5.7 kg/m2, and 60% were female. The mean MEQ score was 58.0±10.7. The sleep pattern evaluated by the actigraphic analyses showed that 92% had a monophasic sleep pattern, 7% biphasic, and 1% polyphasic sleep pattern. Cluster analysis, based on time to sleep onset, sleep efficiency, sleep latency, and total sleep time, was able to identify three different groups denominated: morning type, evening type, and undefined type. Morning type subjects were more frequent, older, and had higher MEQ scores than evening type subjects. Our results showed that the actigraph objectively assessed the sleep-wake cycle and was able to discriminate between morning and evening type individuals. These findings suggest that the actigraph could be a valuable tool for assessing temporal sleep patterns, including the circadian preferences.
    Sleep Science 09/2014; 164(3). DOI:10.1016/j.slsci.2014.09.012
Show more


35 Reads