Article
Density functional calculations of chemical shielding of backbone 15N in helical residues of protein G.
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742-2021, USA.
Journal of Biomolecular NMR (impact factor:
3.61).
08/2009;
45(3):245-53.
DOI:10.1007/s10858-009-9358-3
pp.245-53
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (1)
-
Article: Ultrahigh resolution protein structures using NMR chemical shift tensors.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: NMR chemical shift tensors (CSTs) in proteins, as well as their orientations, represent an important new restraint class for protein structure refinement and determination. Here, we present the first determination of both CST magnitudes and orientations for (13)Cα and (15)N (peptide backbone) groups in a protein, the β1 IgG binding domain of protein G from Streptococcus spp., GB1. Site-specific (13)Cα and (15)N CSTs were measured using synchronously evolved recoupling experiments in which (13)C and (15)N tensors were projected onto the (1)H-(13)C and (1)H-(15)N vectors, respectively, and onto the (15)N-(13)C vector in the case of (13)Cα. The orientations of the (13)Cα CSTs to the (1)H-(13)C and (13)C-(15)N vectors agreed well with the results of ab initio calculations, with an rmsd of approximately 8°. In addition, the measured (15)N tensors exhibited larger reduced anisotropies in α-helical versus β-sheet regions, with very limited variation (18 ± 4°) in the orientation of the z-axis of the (15)N CST with respect to the (1)H-(15)N vector. Incorporation of the (13)Cα CST restraints into structure calculations, in combination with isotropic chemical shifts, transferred echo double resonance (13)C-(15)N distances and vector angle restraints, improved the backbone rmsd to 0.16 Å (PDB ID code 2LGI) and is consistent with existing X-ray structures (0.51 Å agreement with PDB ID code 2QMT). These results demonstrate that chemical shift tensors have considerable utility in protein structure refinement, with the best structures comparable to 1.0-Å crystal structures, based upon empirical metrics such as Ramachandran geometries and χ(1)/χ(2) distributions, providing solid-state NMR with a powerful tool for de novo structure determination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 10/2011; 108(41):16974-9. · 9.68 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
15)N chemical
8-residue fragment model
alpha-helix
calculations
charge field
charged form
chemical shieldings
computationally efficient methodology
density functional calculations
different complexity
good agreement
helical residues
interactions
ionizable side chains
ionizable side chains yield
long-range intra-protein electrostatic interactions
models
protein G
side chains
tensor elements