Response to noise from modern wind farms in The Netherlands

Halmstad University and University of Gothenburg, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (Impact Factor: 1.56). 09/2009; 126(2):634-43. DOI: 10.1121/1.3160293
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The increasing number and size of wind farms call for more data on human response to wind turbine noise, so that a generalized dose-response relationship can be modeled and possible adverse health effects avoided. This paper reports the results of a 2007 field study in The Netherlands with 725 respondents. A dose-response relationship between calculated A-weighted sound pressure levels and reported perception and annoyance was found. Wind turbine noise was more annoying than transportation noise or industrial noise at comparable levels, possibly due to specific sound properties such as a "swishing" quality, temporal variability, and lack of nighttime abatement. High turbine visibility enhances negative response, and having wind turbines visible from the dwelling significantly increased the risk of annoyance. Annoyance was strongly correlated with a negative attitude toward the visual impact of wind turbines on the landscape. The study further demonstrates that people who benefit economically from wind turbines have a significantly decreased risk of annoyance, despite exposure to similar sound levels. Response to wind turbine noise was similar to that found in Sweden so the dose-response relationship should be generalizable.


Available from: Eja Pedersen, Dec 17, 2013
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Wind energy is considered one of the most promising renewable energy sources. However, the advancement of wind power generation is impeded by major challenges such as the cost of wind power, environmental impacts, and effects on power grid stability. One of the major environmental challenges hindering public acceptance for new wind power installations is the noise emission from wind turbines. Unfortunately, reducing the noise emission could lead to decreased wind energy harvesting. As a result of these conflicting goals, a tradeoff between power generation and noise emission arises.
    06/2015; 10. DOI:10.1016/j.seta.2015.01.005
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The current study aims at analysing the perception and opinions of people exposed to Wind Turbine (WT) noise. Noise measurements were carried out in a wind farm in the north of Portugal. Data were analysed and crossed with the answers to a survey applied in four nearby villages. Although the noise levels were generally low, it was found that the direct visibility of the WT makes people feel more annoyed and also more sensitive to noise. Finally, it seems that the economic interests that exposed people may have in WT did not significantly affect their annoyance. Noise annoyance perception rather seems to be related to specific aspects, such as the general opinion of people about wind power generation.
    Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 01/2014; 109. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.478
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Community-based wind energy projects, with their small-scale, yet sizeable presence, provide a valuable opportunity to understand how individuals make sense of changes to their communities and to the surrounding landscape. Here, we examine the results of a 2013 mail survey of individuals residing in the vicinity of a 2 MW wind turbine that is located on the edge of the historic coastal town of Lewes, Delaware in the United States, and adjacent to Delaware Bay and the Great Marsh Preserve. The wind turbine, which was constructed in 2010, primarily serves the University of Delaware's coastal campus, and to a lesser extent the town of Lewes. Seventy-eight percent hold positive or very positive attitudes toward the wind turbine, with only 10% having negative or very negative attitudes, and 82% like the look of the wind turbine. Socially constructed aspects find more resonance than physical ones (e.g., attractiveness) in explaining this latter finding, with the wind turbine being reflective of a transformation to a clean energy future for those residents who like the way the turbine looks. On the other hand, those objecting to its look, find the turbine does not fit the landscape. Policy implications of these findings and others related to wind turbine sound are considered, and recommendations for better understanding of proposed developments from the vantage point of the affected communities, including how a community views itself and its surrounding landscape, are made.
    Land Use Policy 07/2015; 46. DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.015 · 3.13 Impact Factor