Article
Prevalence and changes in chronic diseases among South Korean farmers: 1998 to 2005.
Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Graduate School of Public Health, Korea University, Seoul, Korea. .k
BMC Public Health (impact factor:
2).
08/2009;
9:268.
DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-9-268
pp.268
Source: PubMed
- Citations (34)
-
Cited In (0)
-
Article: Mortality and morbidity in agriculture in the United States.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This article summarizes the trends in agricultural injuries and illnesses in the past decade, as well as the needs for surveillance in the future. Agriculture is one of the most hazardous industries in the U.S. The fatality rate in agriculture remained high (about 22/100,000 workers) through the 1990s. and tractors remained the leading source of death, causing approximately 300 fatalities each year. Non-fatal injuries and illnesses decreased in the employed agricultural worker population. There are no adequate injury and illness data for self-employed farmers and family members to show trends over time. The reported injury rates have been 0.5 to 16.6/100 workers, based on the source of information. Many studies have shown high rates of respiratory and musculoskeletal symptoms, hearing loss, and skin disorders in agriculture. The overall cancer rate is lower; however, certain cancers are elevated in farmers. Surveillance information has not improved significantly in the past decade; however, many studies have provided more insight into the prevalence, incidence, and risk factors for injury and illness. Further efforts are needed to better define the populations at risk, including farmers and ranchers, family members, workers, migrant and seasonal workers, and others exposed to farm hazards. Fatalities are well documented, and it is important to continue existing surveillance in the future. Surveillance systems should be developed to collect information on agriculture-related non-fatal injuries and illnesses.Journal of agricultural safety and health 09/2002; 8(3):259-76. -
Article: Mortality among participants in the agricultural health study.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This analysis of the Agricultural Health Study cohort assesses the mortality experience of licensed pesticide applicators and their spouses. This report is based on 52,393 private applicators (who are mostly farmers) and 32,345 spouses of farmers in Iowa and North Carolina. At enrollment, each pesticide applicator completed a 21-page enrollment questionnaire. Mortality assessment from enrollment (1994-1997) through 2000 provided an average follow-up of about 5.3 years, 447,154 person-years, and 2055 deaths. Compared with the general population in the two states, the cohort experienced a very low mortality rate. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for total mortality, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, COPD, total cancer, and cancers of the esophagus, stomach, and lung were 0.6 or lower for both farmers and spouses. These deficits varied little by farm size, type of crops or livestock on the farm, years of handling pesticides, holding a non-farm job, or length of follow up. SMRs among ever smokers were not as low as among never smokers, but were still less than 1.0 for all smoking-related causes of death. No statistically significant excesses occurred, but slightly elevated SMRs, or those near 1.0, were noted for diseases that have been associated with farming in previous studies. Several factors may contribute to the low mortality observed in this population, including the healthy worker effect typically seen in cohorts of working populations (which may decline in future years), a short follow-up interval, and a healthier lifestyle manifested through lower cigarette use and an occupation that has traditionally required high levels of physical activity.Annals of Epidemiology 05/2005; 15(4):279-85. · 3.21 Impact Factor -
Article: An update of cancer incidence in the Agricultural Health Study.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Our objective is to reevaluate cancer incidence among Agricultural Health Study participants. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and relative standardized ratios were calculated. A significant excess of prostate cancer was seen for private and commercial applicators (SIR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.14, 1.25 and SIR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.00, 1.61, respectively). Excesses were observed for lip cancer (SIR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.02, 3.44) and multiple myeloma (SIR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.00, 1.95) among private applicators from North Carolina and for marginal zone lymphoma among Iowa spouses (SIR = 2.34, 95% CI = 1.21, 4.09). Although lower rates of smoking and increased physical activity probably contribute to the lower overall cancer incidence, agricultural exposures including pesticides, viruses, bacteria, sunlight, and other chemicals may increase risks for specific cancer sites.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine / American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 11/2010; 52(11):1098-105. · 1.88 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
Asian farmers
chronic diseases
consecutive cross-sectional national surveys
direct method
disease prevalence
diseases prevalence
distinct pattern
Epidemiologic studies
female farmers
gender-standardized prevalence
higher prevalence
higher prevalence changes
Korean National Health
limited information
musculoskeletal diseases
Nutrition Examination Survey 1998
occupational groups
prevalence changes
South Korean farmers
unique pattern