Neural Correlates of Direct and Reflected Self-Appraisals in Adolescents and Adults: When Social Perspective-Taking Informs Self-Perception

Department of Psychology, 1227 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1227, USA.
Child Development (Impact Factor: 4.92). 07/2009; 80(4):1016-38. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01314.x
Source: PubMed


Classic theories of self-development suggest people define themselves in part through internalized perceptions of other people's beliefs about them, known as reflected self-appraisals. This study uses functional magnetic resonance imaging to compare the neural correlates of direct and reflected self-appraisals in adolescence (N = 12, ages 11-14 years) and adulthood (N = 12, ages 23-30 years). During direct self-reflection, adolescents demonstrated greater activity than adults in networks relevant to self-perception (medial prefrontal and parietal cortices) and social-cognition (dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, temporal-parietal junction, and posterior superior temporal sulcus), suggesting adolescent self-construals may rely more heavily on others' perspectives about the self. Activity in the medial fronto-parietal network was also enhanced when adolescents took the perspective of someone more relevant to a given domain.

Download full-text


Available from: Mirella Dapretto,
  • Source
    • "ocused and narrowed recruitment of temporoparietal junction ( TPJ ) —especially the right TPJ—for belief reasoning , beyond recruitment for more generalized social reasoning ( Saxe and Wexler , 2005 ; Saxe and Powell , 2006 ) . In children , however , there is some evidence that TPJ is less specialized compared to adults ( Mosconi et al . , 2005 ; Pfeifer et al . , 2009 ; Sabbagh et al . , 2009 ; Saxe et al . , 2009 ; Gweon et al . , 2012 ) . For example , for false - belief processing ( Sommer et al . , 2010 ) and for general mental - state processing ( Gweon et al . , 2012 ) , although both children and adults show similar recruitment in cortical midline regions ( i . e . , dorsal MPFC and dorsal ante"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Behaviorally, children’s explicit theory of mind (ToM) proceeds in a progression of mental-state understandings: developmentally, children demonstrate accurate explicit desire-reasoning before accurate explicit belief-reasoning. Given its robust and cross-cultural nature, we hypothesize this progression may be paced in part by maturation/specialization of the brain. Neuroimaging research demonstrates that the right temporoparietal junction (TPJ) becomes increasingly selective for ToM reasoning as children age, and as their ToM improves. But this research has narrowly focused on beliefs or on undifferentiated mental-states. A recent ERP study in children included a critical contrast to desire-reasoning, and demonstrated that right posterior potentials differentiated belief-reasoning from desire-reasoning. Taken together, the literature suggests that children’s desire-belief progression may be paced by specialization of the right TPJ for belief-reasoning specifically, beyond desire-reasoning. In the present study, we tested this hypothesis directly by examining children’s belief- and desire-reasoning using functional near-infrared spectroscopy in conjunction with structural magnetic resonance imaging to pinpoint brain activation in the right TPJ. Results showed greatest activation in the right TPJ for belief-reasoning, beyond desire-reasoning, and beyond non-mental reasoning (control). Findings replicate and critically extend prior ERP results, and provide clear evidence for a specific neural mechanism underlying children’s progression from understanding desires to understanding beliefs.
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10/2015; 9. DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00560 · 3.63 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Implicitly or explicitly, people form metaperceptions, or beliefs about how other people perceive them. Metaperceptions powerfully shape how people feel about themselves and inform decisions such as how to behave as well as who to befriend, who to form professional alliances with, and who to pursue as a romantic partner (Elfenbein, Eisenkraft, & Ding, 2009; Leary, 2005; Murray, Holmes, MacDonald, & Ellsworth, 1998; Pfeifer et al., 2009; Schlenker & Weigold, 1992). Thus, metaperceptions provide an implicit map that people use to navigate their social worlds. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Do people with personality problems have insight into how others experience them? In a large community sample of adults (N = 641), the authors examined whether people with personality disorder (PD) symptoms were aware of how a close acquaintance (i.e., a romantic partner, family member, or friend) perceived them by measuring participants' metaperceptions and self-perceptions as well as their acquaintance's impression of them on Five-Factor Model traits. Compared to people with fewer PD symptoms, people with more PD symptoms tended to be less accurate and tended to overestimate the negativity of the impressions they made on their acquaintance, especially for the traits of extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. Interestingly, these individuals did not necessarily assume that their acquaintance perceived them as they perceived themselves; instead, poor insight was likely due to their inability to detect or utilize information other than their self-perceptions. Implications for the conceptualization, measurement, and treatment of PDs are discussed.
    Journal of personality disorders 08/2015; 29(4):449-67. DOI:10.1521/pedi.2015.29.4.449 · 3.08 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "In particular , activity recruited during adolescent direct social self-evaluations was weaker than expected, relative to previous research (Pfeifer et al., 2013b). Furthermore, contrary to our hypotheses and inconsistent with previous research (Pfeifer et al., 2009), adolescents did not recruit significant social cognition regions, such as TPJ, during direct or reflected self-evaluations, relative to malleabilityevaluations , nor greater activity than adults during direct self-evaluations, relative to malleability-evaluations. These divergent findings may be driven by the implementation of a novel control condition (evaluating trait malleability), the adoption of a specific paradigm design [modeling conditions as events, not blocks, which may represent transient, not sustained, effects (e.g., Petersen and Dubis, 2011)], or the use of more conservative preprocessing/data analysis methods. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The current fMRI study investigated the neural foundations of evaluating oneself and others during early adolescence and young adulthood. Eighteen early adolescents (ages 11-14, M = 12.6) and 19 young adults (ages 22-31, M = 25.6) evaluated if academic, physical, and social traits described themselves directly (direct self-evaluations), described their best friend directly (direct other-evaluations), described themselves from their best friend's perspective (reflected self-evaluations), or in general could change over time (control malleability-evaluations). Compared to control evaluations, both adolescents and adults recruited cortical midline structures during direct and reflected self-evaluations, as well as during direct other-evaluations, converging with previous research. However, unique to this study was a significant three-way interaction between age group, evaluative perspective, and domain within bilateral ventral striatum. Region of interest analyses demonstrated a significant evaluative perspective by domain interaction within the adolescent sample only. Adolescents recruited greatest bilateral ventral striatum during reflected social self-evaluations, which was positively correlated with age and pubertal development. These findings suggest that reflected social self-evaluations, made from the inferred perspective of a close peer, may be especially self-relevant, salient, or rewarding to adolescent self-processing–particularly during the progression through adolescence–and this feature persists into adulthood.
    04/2014; 8. DOI:10.1016/j.dcn.2014.01.003
Show more