Article
The relationship between gender and postconcussion symptoms after sport-related mild traumatic brain injury.
University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rochester, NY, USA.
Der Notarzt (impact factor:
0.28).
04/2009;
1(3):245-53.
DOI:10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.01.011
pp.245-53
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (2)
-
Article: Biomechanics of concussion.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The rising awareness of the long-term health problems associated with concussions re-emphasizes the need for understanding the mechanical etiology of concussions. This article reviews past studies defining the common mechanisms for mild traumatic brain injury and summarizes efforts to convert the external input to the head (force, acceleration, and velocity) into estimates of motions and deformations of the brain that occur during mild traumatic brain injury. Studies of how these mechanical conditions contribute to the cellular mechanisms of damage in mild traumatic brain injury are reviewed. Finally, future directions for improving understanding concussion biomechanics are discussed.Clinics in sports medicine 01/2011; 30(1):19-31, vii. · 1.33 Impact Factor -
Article: Post-concussion syndrome: prevalence after mild traumatic brain injury in comparison with a sample without head injury.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To compare the prevalence of persistent post-concussion syndrome (PCS; >1 year post-injury) in participants with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and those without head injury. A cross-sectional sample of 119 participants with mTBI and 246 without previous head injury. Online questionnaires collected data about post-concussion symptoms, cognitive failures, anxiety, depression, sleep behaviour and post-traumatic stress disorder. Variability within the sample was addressed by splitting by PCS diagnosis to create four groups: mTBI + PCS, mTBI-PCS, Control + PCS and Control-PCS. PCS was diagnosed using ICD-10 criteria in all groups, with controls not requiring previous head injury. PCS was present to a similar extent in participants with no head injury (34%) compared to those with mTBI (31%). Only report of headaches, which could be caused by expectation bias, distinguished between mTBI + PCS and Control + PCS groups. In addition, significantly higher cognitive problems were observed in participants with mTBI compared with the control group. Persistent PCS, as currently defined, is not specific to mTBI. These data suggest that somatic and cognitive symptoms are most likely to be able to distinguish PCS after mTBI from that present in the general population. Further research is necessary into these factors in order to create more specific PCS diagnostic criteria.Brain Injury 11/2011; 26(1):14-26. · 1.36 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
3 months
adult females
age-differential recovery
American Congress
appropriate follow-up
emergency department evaluation
female gender
gender differences
greater risk
increased risk
mild brain injury
odds ratio [OR]
postconcussion symptoms
previous head injury
Prospective nested cohort study
Regional trauma center emergency department
Rehabilitation Medicine criteria
sport characteristics
sport-related mild traumatic brain injury
sport-related mTBI