Dosimetric characterization and application of an imaging beam line with a carbon electron target for megavoltage cone beam computed tomography

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52245, USA.
Medical Physics (Impact Factor: 2.64). 07/2009; 36(6):2181-92. DOI: 10.1118/1.3125663
Source: PubMed


Imaging dose from megavoltage cone beam computed tomography (MVCBCT) can be significantly reduced without loss of image quality by using an imaging beam line (IBL), with no flattening filter and a carbon, rather than tungsten, electron target. The IBL produces a greater keV-range x-ray fluence than the treatment beam line (TBL), which results in a more optimal detector response. The IBL imaging dose is not necessarily negligible, however. In this work an IBL was dosimetrically modeled with the Philips Pinnacle3 treatment planning system (TPS), verified experimentally, and applied to clinical cases. The IBL acquisition dose for a 200 degrees gantry rotation was verified in a customized acrylic cylindrical phantom at multiple imaging field sizes with 196 ion chamber measurements. Agreement between the measured and calculated IBL dose was quantified with the 3D gamma index. Representative IBL and TBL imaging dose distributions were calculated for head and neck and prostate patients and included in treatment plans using the imaging dose incorporation (IDI) method. Surface dose was measured for the TBL and IBL for four head and neck cancer patients with MOSFETs. The IBL model, when compared to the percentage depth dose and profile measurements, had 97% passing gamma indices for dosimetric and distance acceptance criteria of 3%, 3 mm, and 100% passed for 5.2%, 5.2 mm. For the ion chamber measurements of phantom image acquisition dose, the IBL model had 93% passing gamma indices for acceptance criteria of 3%, 3 mm, and 100% passed for 4%, 4 mm. Differences between the IBL- and TBL-based IMRT treatment plans created with the IDI method were dosimetrically insignificant for both the prostate and head and neck cases. For IBL and TBL beams with monitor unit values that would result in the delivery of the same dose to the depth of maximum dose under standard calibration conditions, the IBL imaging surface dose was higher than the TBL imaging surface dose by an average of 18%, with a standard deviation of 8% (p = 2 x 10(-6)). The IBL can be modeled with acceptable accuracy using a standard TPS, and accounting for IBL dose in treatment plans with the IDI method is straightforward. The resulting composite dose distributions, assuming similar imaging doses, are negligibly different from those of the TBL. The increased IBL surface dose relative to the TBL is likely clinically insignificant.

Download full-text


Available from: Ali Bani-Hashemi, Mar 27, 2015
10 Reads
  • Source
    • "Varian OBI Single beam, half-fan, half-bowtie Beam data collection, MC simulation and verification Chow [58] Elekta XVI Single cassette, no filter Beam data collection, MC simulation and verification Spezi [50] Elekta XVI Multiple cassettes, no filter Beam data collection, MC simulation and verification Downes [51] Elekta XVI Multiple cassettes, bowtie Beam data collection, MC simulation and verification Ding [48] Varian OBI Multiple beams/filters Beam data collection, MC simulation and verification Alaei [52] Varian OBI Single beam, half-fan, half-bowtie Modeling in TPS and verification Deng [59] Varian OBI Half-fan, half-bowtie & Full-fan, full-bowtie Beam data collection, MC simulation and verification Deng [60] Varian OBI Half-fan, half-bowtie & Full-fan, full-bowtie Beam data collection, MC simulation and verification Alaei [53] Elekta XVI Multiple cassettes, no filter and bowtie Modeling in TPS and verification Dzierma [57] Siemens kView Two beam qualities Beam data collection, modeling in TPS and verification Megavoltage CBCT Flynn [45] Siemens IBL IBL beam Beam data collection, modeling in TPS and verification Table 4 Summary of CBCT Monte Carlo dose calculations. Manufacturer Acquisition techniques per frame Code used Dose type Source type Phantom type Dose summary Chow [58] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Imaging dose in radiation therapy has traditionally been ignored due to its low magnitude and frequency in comparison to therapeutic dose used to treat patients. The advent of modern, volumetric, imaging modalities, often as an integral part of linear accelerators, has facilitated the implementation of image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT), which is often accomplished by daily imaging of patients. Daily imaging results in additional dose delivered to patient that warrants new attention be given to imaging dose. This review summarizes the imaging dose delivered to patients as the result of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging performed in radiation therapy using current methods and equipment. This review also summarizes methods to calculate the imaging dose, including the use of Monte Carlo (MC) and treatment planning systems (TPS). Peripheral dose from CBCT imaging, dose reduction methods, the use of effective dose in describing imaging dose, and the measurement of CT dose index (CTDI) in CBCT systems are also reviewed. Copyright © 2015 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Physica Medica 07/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.06.003 · 2.40 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "To further improve image quality and reduce the imaging dose, several authors have modified the linac to include a low atomic number (Z) target to increase the proportion of low-energy photons in the beam (Faddegon et al 2008, Flampouri et al 2002, Flynn et al 2009, Pouliot et al 2005, Robar et al 2009, Sawkey et al 2010, Faddegon et al 2010, Beltran 2009). All have reported significant improvements in planar and CBCT imaging. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Computed tomography images have been acquired using an experimental (low atomic number (Z) insert) megavoltage cone-beam imaging system. These images have been compared with standard megavoltage and kilovoltage imaging systems. The experimental system requires a simple modification to the 4 MeV electron beam from an Elekta Precise linac. Low-energy photons are produced in the standard medium-Z electron window and a low-Z carbon electron absorber located after the window. The carbon electron absorber produces photons as well as ensuring that all remaining electrons from the source are removed. A detector sensitive to diagnostic x-ray energies is also employed. Quantitative assessment of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) contrast shows that the low-Z imaging system is an order of magnitude or more superior to a standard 6 MV imaging system. CBCT data with the same contrast-to-noise ratio as a kilovoltage imaging system (0.15 cGy) can be obtained in doses of 11 and 244 cGy for the experimental and standard 6 MV systems, respectively. Whilst these doses are high for everyday imaging, qualitative images indicate that kilovoltage like images suitable for patient positioning can be acquired in radiation doses of 1-8 cGy with the experimental low-Z system.
    Physics in Medicine and Biology 06/2011; 56(14):4453-64. DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/56/14/014 · 2.76 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the properties of a megavoltage cone-beam CT system using the unflattened beam from a sintered diamond target at 4 and 6 MV. A sintered diamond target was used in place of a graphite target as part of an imaging beam line (an unflattened beam from a graphite target) installed on a linear accelerator. The diamond target, with a greater density than the graphite target, permitted imaging at the lower beam energy (4 MV) required with the graphite target and the higher beam energy (6 MV) conventionally used with the tungsten/stainless steel target and stainless steel flattening filter. Images of phantoms and patients were acquired using the different beam lines and compared. The beam spectra and dose distributions were determined using Monte Carlo simulation. The diamond target allowed use of the same beam energy as for treatment, simplifying commissioning and quality assurance. Images acquired with the diamond target at 4 MV were similar to those obtained with the graphite target at 4 MV. The slight reduction in low energy photons due to the higher-Z sintering material in the diamond target had minimal effect on image quality. Images acquired at 6 MV with the diamond target showed a small decrease in contrast-to-noise ratio, resulting from a decrease in the fraction of photons in the beam in the energy range to which the detector is most sensitive. The diamond target provides images of a similar quality to the graphite target. Diamond allows use of the higher beam energy conventionally used for treatment, provides a higher dose rate for the same beam current, and potentially simplifies installation and maintenance of the beam line.
    Medical Physics 03/2010; 37(3):1246-53. DOI:10.1118/1.3302831 · 2.64 Impact Factor
Show more