Article

Relationship Between Quality of Care and Functional Decline in Hospitalized Vulnerable Elders

Department of Medicine, Section of General Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
Medical care (Impact Factor: 2.94). 08/2009; 47(8):895-901. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181a7e3ec
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although process of care is a valuable dimension of quality, process-of-care-based quality indicators (POC-QIs) are ideally associated with meaningful patient outcomes. The relationship between POC-QIs for hospitalized older patients and functional decline, a relevant outcome for older patients, is unknown.
To assess the relationship between POC-QIs for hospitalized elders and functional decline.
Observational cohort study.
Hospitalized vulnerable elder patients age 65 or older admitted to a general medicine inpatient service from June 1, 2004 to June 1, 2007.
POC-QIs received by hospitalized patients (measured by Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders QIs) and functional decline (increased activities of daily living impairments postdischarge).
For 898 vulnerable elder patients, mean adherence to 6 universally applied quality indicators was 57.8%. After adjustment for factors likely associated with functional decline (comorbidity, vulnerability, baseline functional limitation, number of POC-QIs triggered, length of stay, code status, and interaction between frailty and QI adherence), there was no association higher quality of care (using the composite score) and increased risk of functional decline. Patients who received a mobility plan were 1.48 (95% CI: 1.07-2.05; P = 0.017) times more likely to suffer functional decline after discharge. Patients who received an assessment of nutritional status had a lower odds of suffering functional decline after discharge (OR: 0.37, [95% CI: 0.21-0.64; P < 0.001]).
Hospitalized vulnerable elders who receive higher quality of care, as measured by Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders QIs, are not less likely to suffer decline after discharge.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Juned Siddique, Sep 01, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
115 Views
 · 
53 Downloads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Résumé L’hospitalisation représente la première cause de déclin fonctionnel chez les personnes âgées; 30 à 60% d’entre elles perdent de l’autonomie sur les activités de base de la vie quotidienne (AVQ). Cette perte d’indépendance résulte de l’affection aigue qui a motivé l’hospitalisation mais est aussi liée aux modalités de prise en charge. Objectif cet article est la première étape d’un projet visant à prévenir la «dépendance iatrogène» à l’hôpital. Methode lors d’une réunion de deux jours à Monaco, un groupe de travail composé de 20 experts internationaux a analysé 106 articles relevants, défini les axes de travail et rédigé une synthèse. Résultats 1- La “Dépendance Iatrogène” (Iatrogenic Disability) a été définie par le groupe d’experts comme la dépendance le plus souvent évitable en relation avec les soins. Elle fait intervenir trois composantes intriquées et cumulatives: 1) la fragilityé préexistante du patient, 2) la sévérité de la pathologie qui a conduit le malade à l’hôpital 3) enfin la structure hospitalière et les soins qu’elle dispense. 2- La prévention de la «dépendance Iatrogène » implique des étapes successives. La première consiste à prendre conscience que l’hospitalisation peut créer de la dépendance. Les études épidémiologiques ont permis d’identifier les populations à risques grâce à des scores composites (HARP, ISAR, SHERPA, COMPRI, ...). La deuxième étape consiste à considérer que le déclin fonctionnel n’est pas une fatalité. Des référentiels qualité ont déjà été rédigés. Des interventions pour prévenir la dépendance sur des populations ciblées ont été mises en place: simple consultation gériatrique, interventions monofactorielles (mobilité, confusion, iatrogénie ...) ou interventions multidomaines (GEM Units et ACE Units, HELP, Fast Track, NICHE ...). Ces actions, essentiellement centrées sur la fragilité du patient, ont des résultats limités car elles prennent peu en compte le fonctionnement de l’institution, non orientée vers la prévention du déclin fonctionnel. La dispensation des soins affiche aussi des dysfonctionnements: manque de connaissances en gériatrie, défaut d’évaluation et de prise en charge du statut fonctionnel. Les nouvelles interventions devront non seulement repérer les patients à risques pour qu’ils bénéficient d’une prise en charge spécialisée mais aussi avoir pour cible la structure hospitalière et les soins. Ceci implique de réaliser une « démarche qualityé » graduée et de repenser l’organisation de l’hôpital autour de la personne âgée.
    Les cahiers de l année gérontologique 10/2011; 3(1). DOI:10.1007/s12612-011-0199-9
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Improving patients' ability to identify their inpatient physicians and understand their roles is vital to safe patient care. Picture cards were designed to facilitate physician introductions. The effect of Feedback Care and Evaluation (FACE) cards on patients' ability to correctly identify their inpatient physicians and on patients understanding of physicians roles was assessed. In October 2006, team members introduced themselves with FACE cards, which included a photo and an explanation of their roles. During an inpatient interview, research assistants asked patients to name their inpatient physicians and trainees and to rate their understanding of their physicians' roles. Of 2,100 eligible patients, 1,686 (80%) patients participated in the baseline period, and 857 (67%) of the 1,278 patients in the intervention period participated in the evaluation. With the FACE intervention, patients were significantly more likely to correctly identify at least one inpatient physician (attending, resident, or intern; baseline 12.5% versus intervention 21.1%; p < .001). Of the 181 patients who were able to correctly identify at least one inpatient physician in the intervention period, research assistants noted that 59% (107) had FACE cards visible in their rooms. Surprisingly, fewer patients rated their understanding of their physicians' roles as excellent or very good in the intervention period (45.6%) compared with the baseline period (55.3%; p < .001). Although FACE cards improved patients ability to identify their inpatient physicians, many patients still could not identify their inpatient doctors. FACE cards may have served as a reminder to physicians to introduce themselves to their patients. The FACE cards also served to highlight patients' misunderstanding of their physicians' roles.
    Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety / Joint Commission Resources 12/2009; 35(12):613-9.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess the relationship between quality of hospital care, as measured by Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders (ACOVE) quality indicators (QI), and postdischarge mortality for hospitalized seniors. Observational cohort study. Single academic medical center. Patients aged 65 and older who were identified as "vulnerable" using the Vulnerable Elder Survey (VES-13). Adherence to 16 ACOVE measures through chart audit; postdischarge mortality obtained from Social Security Death Index. One thousand eight hundred fifty-six inpatient vulnerable older adults were enrolled. Mean quality-of-care score was 59.5 ± 19.2%, and 495 (26.7%) died within 1 year of discharge. In multivariate logistic regression, controlling for sociodemographic and disease severity variables (Charlson comorbidity score, VES-13 score, number of QIs triggered, length of stay, baseline activity of daily living limitations, code status), higher quality of care appeared to be associated with lower risk of death at 1 year. For each 10% increase in quality score, patients were 7% less likely to die (odds ratio=0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.87-1.00; P=.045). In Cox proportional hazard models, hospitalized patients receiving quality of care better than the median quality score were less likely to die during the 1-year period after discharge (hazard ratio (HR)=0.82, 95% CI=0.68-1.00; P=.05). Patients who received a nutritional status assessment were less likely to die during the year after discharge (HR=0.61, 95% CI=0.40-0.93; P=.02). Higher quality of care for hospitalized seniors, as measured using ACOVE measures, may be associated with a lower likelihood of death 1 year after discharge. Given these findings, future work testing interventions to improve adherence to these QIs is warranted.
    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 09/2010; 58(9):1642-8. DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03024.x · 4.22 Impact Factor
Show more