Article

Trimer stabilization, oligomerization, and antibody-mediated cell surface immobilization improve the activity of soluble trimers of CD27L, CD40L, 41BBL, and glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor ligand.

Division of Molecular Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
The Journal of Immunology (Impact Factor: 5.36). 09/2009; 183(3):1851-61. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0802597
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT For many ligands of the TNF family, trimer stability and oligomerization status are crucial determinants of receptor activation. However, for the immunostimulatory ligands CD27L, CD40L, 41BBL, and glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor ligand (GITRL) detailed information regarding these requirements is lacking. Here, we comprehensively evaluated the effect of trimer stability and oligomerization on receptor activation by these ligands. Treatment with soluble Flag-tagged CD27L, 41BBL, and GITRL minimally activated receptor signaling, while Flag-CD40L was highly active. Oligomerization with anti-Flag Abs further enhanced the specific activity of Flag-CD40L 10-fold and of Flag-41BBL more than 200-fold, but it failed to activate Flag-CD27L and Flag-GITRL. We next investigated the relevance of trimer stability by introducing the tenascin-C (TNC) trimerization domain, yielding stabilized Flag-TNC-ligand trimers. Oligomerization with anti-Flag Ab potently activated signaling by Flag-TNC-CD27L and Flag-TNC-GITRL and, albeit to a lesser extent, Flag-TNC-CD40L and Flag-TNC-41BBL. Forced hexamerization, by introducing an Ig Fc domain, revealed that hexameric derivatives of Flag-TNC-41BBL, Flag-CD40L, and Flag-TNC-GITRL all activate receptor signaling with high efficiency, whereas hexameric Flag-CD27L variant left inactive. Finally, we attempted to selectively activate receptor signaling on targeted cells, by using Ab fragment (single-chain fragment variable region, scFv)-ligand fusion proteins, an approach previously applied to other TNF ligands. Target cell surface Ag-selective activation was achieved for scFv-41BBL, scFv-CD40L, and scFv-GITRL, although the latter two displayed already significant activity toward Ag-negative cells. In conclusion, our data establish that trimeric CD40L is active, 41BBL requires hexamerization, GITRL requires trimer stabilization, and CD27L requires trimer stabilization and oligomerization. Furthermore, surface immobilization might be exploited to gain locally enhanced ligand activity.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Nicole Müller-Sienerth, Jun 27, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
71 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The CD40-CD154 dyad is an intensely studied field as is glycosylation status and both impact immunological functions and autoimmune conditions. CD40 has several isoforms, is modified by glycosylation, and trimerizes to form the functional receptor. We described a CD4(+)CD40(+) T cell (Th40) subset which is expanded in autoimmunity and is necessary and sufficient in transferring type 1 diabetes. Glycosylation impacts immunological events and T cells from autoimmune mouse strains express 30-40% less GlcNAc-branched N-glycans than T cells from non-autoimmune strains, a decrease known to activate T cells. Here we demonstrate that several CD40 receptor constellations exist on CD4 T cells. However, rather than containing different isoforms of CD40 they contain different glycoforms of isoform I. The glycoform profile is dependent on availability of CD154 and autoimmune NOD mice express a high level of a less glycosylated form. Interestingly, CD40 stimulation induces some CD40 receptor constellations that contain TNF-receptors 1 and 2 and targeting of those alters CD40 signaling outcomes in NOD Th40 cells. CD40-stimulation in vivo of non-autoimmune BALB/c mice expands the Th40 population and alters the CD40 glycoform profile of those cells to appear more like that of autoimmune prone NOD mice. Further understanding the dynamics and composition of the different CD40 receptor constellations will provide important insights into treatment options in autoimmunity.
    Molecular Immunology 08/2010; 47(14):2303-13. DOI:10.1016/j.molimm.2010.05.288 · 3.00 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cytokines are essential coordinators of defensive immune responses for resolving the invasion of pathogens such as bacteria, virus, and fungi. However, dysregulated cytokines are the main cause of various autoinflammatory immune disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, and psoriasis. Interleukin-32 (IL-32) is a recently described cytokine and characterized as a proinflammatory cytokine. IL-32 stimulates monocytes and macrophages to induce important proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα) and chemokines (IL-8 and MIP-2) by activating the NF-κB and p38 mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways. The biological activities of IL-32 are associated with epidemic pathogens, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, influenza A virus, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). IL-32 is transcribed as six alternative splice variants (α, β, γ, δ, ɛ, and ζ), with IL-32γ being the most active isoform. However, it is unclear which isoform is related to specific disease activities since there are no high quality antibodies available to measure circulating IL-32 in biological samples of patients. Therefore, we developed specific anti-human IL-32γ monoclonal antibodies from recombinant human IL-32γ, which was expressed in Escherichia coli. The IL-32γ specific monoclonal antibodies recognized IL-32 in cell culture supernatants and serum of IL-32γ transgenic mice. The newly developed IL-32γ monoclonal antibodies will be a useful tool to measure IL-32 level in serum samples of various inflammatory diseases. These monoclonal antibodies will be helpful in investigating the precise function of IL-32 in immune responses and in autoinflammatory diseases.
    Hybridoma (2005) 11/2010; 29(6):501-9. DOI:10.1089/hyb.2010.0059 · 0.24 Impact Factor
  • Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 01/2011; 691:507-19. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4419-6612-4_53 · 2.01 Impact Factor