Perioperative outcomes and amputation-free survival after lower extremity bypass surgery in California hospitals, 1996-1999, with follow-up through 2004.

Division of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Journal of vascular surgery: official publication, the Society for Vascular Surgery [and] International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter (Impact Factor: 2.98). 08/2009; 50(4):776-783.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.05.050
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT There are very few population-based studies of long-term outcomes after lower extremity (LE) bypass graft surgery. This study analyzes perioperative and long-term limb salvage and amputation-free survival outcomes for patients undergoing initial aortoiliac or femoropopliteal bypass graft surgery in California hospitals from 1996 to 1999.
Administrative data with encrypted identifiers were used to identify a chronologically first, index admission of all patients undergoing LE bypass procedures for occlusive disease from 1996 to 1999. A 1993 to 1995 look-back period was used to exclude patients who had undergone prior bypass surgery or amputation procedures. Patients with incident procedures were then followed forward to determine subsequent hospitalizations and vital status through 2004. The study comprised 28,128 patients discharged from 345 California hospitals with a median 61.5-month follow-up. Risk factors included demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, admission type, gangrene or ulceration, operation level, hospital LE bypass surgery volume, and year of discharge. Logistic regression was used to analyze 30-day outcomes, and Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze amputation-free survival.
Overall 30-day mortality was 4.3, and the 30-day major amputation rate was 2.6%. Limb salvage was 81.9% at 5 years and 76.4% at 9 years. Amputation-free survival was 51.5% at 5 years and 34.1% at 9 years. Risk factors were generally similar for both perioperative and late outcomes. Advanced age, higher comorbidity level, gangrene, and emergency or nursing home admission conferred significantly greater risk. Hospital volume was associated with both perioperative and late outcomes. African American and Hispanic patients had much higher amputation rates but did not have higher mortality risk after controlling for baseline severity of illness.
Long-term outcomes of LE bypass surgery were superior for high-volume hospital patients. Graft surveillance and risk factor follow-up care provide a major opportunity for quality improvement efforts. The contrast between traditional limb salvage and amputation-free survival outcomes raises questions about the value of surgical treatment, particularly for patients with limited life expectancy and without coding of tissue loss or critical limb ischemia.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Morbidity and mortality following lower limb amputations remain disappointingly high. This study aimed to assess the impact of previous ipsilateral vascular intervention on outcomes following major lower limb amputation (LLA). Prospective data was collected for all major LLAs performed between January 2010 and December 2011. Those who underwent a primary amputation were compared to secondary amputees to establish if previous interventions were a risk factor for morbidity and mortality. A total of 148 patients underwent LLA in the time period. 102 were primary amputees and 46(31.1%) patients had undergone previous ipsilateral revascularisation. Both groups were well matched for demographics and co-morbidities. Those who underwent secondary amputations were older (p=0.016) and more likely to suffer from hypercholesterolaemia (p<0.001). Patients who had undergone a previous intervention were more likely to need revision surgery (17% vs 4.5% p= 0.027). Previous intervention however was not found to be a risk factor for more proximal amputation level (p=0.341) or increased postoperative mortality (p=0.782). Patients who have undergone previous revascularisation may be at higher risk of revision surgery. Survival following major LLA does not appear to be associated with previous re-vascularisation attempts.
    Annals of Vascular Surgery 12/2013; · 1.03 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Race and gender have individually been associated with affecting outcomes in vascular interventions. We hypothesized that race and gender stratification would identify variations in outcomes of lower extremity bypass (LEB) procedures.
    Journal of Vascular Surgery 06/2014; · 2.98 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Some contend that gender differences in outcomes after lower extremity bypass (LEB) for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) relate to socioeconomic factors (SEFs). Here, we evaluate these disparities with attention to clinically relevant yet understudied SEF. A retrospective cohort study of patients aged >50 y with PAD undergoing LEB was performed using data from Pennsylvania Health care and Cost Containment Council (2003-2011). Multivariable logistic regression modeling was performed to evaluate the association between gender and outcomes with adjustment for potential confounders including SEF such as income, insurance provider, distance to hospital, and race. Generalized estimating equations were used to adjust for hospital clustering. Independent models were developed to examine death or serious morbidity (DSM) and failure-to-rescue (FTR). Of 4202 patients identified, 1510 (36%) were women. SEF differed by gender. DSM was more frequent in women (15.6% versus 12.2%; P = 0.002). There was no association between gender and FTR in univariate analysis (P = 0.49). SEFs were associated with DSM and FTR. After adjustment for potential confounders including SEF, women remained more likely to experience DSM (odds ratio = 1.28; P = 0.01). There remained no significant association between gender and FTR on independent modeling (odds ratio = 0.49; P = 0.11). Women undergoing LEB in the state of Pennsylvania are at increased risk of poor outcomes, which is not completely explained by SEF. Quality of postoperative care does not appear to be different between gender as there was no difference in FTR. To improve these outcomes, efforts should be made to increase awareness of PAD and promote screening among high-risk women to ensure timely diagnosis and referral.
    Journal of Surgical Research 01/2014; · 2.12 Impact Factor