Article

Intracellular replication-deficient Leishmania donovani induces long lasting protective immunity against visceral leishmaniasis.

Division of Emerging and Transfusion Transmitted Diseases, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
The Journal of Immunology (Impact Factor: 5.36). 09/2009; 183(3):1813-20. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900276
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT No vaccine is currently available for visceral leishmaniasis (VL) caused by Leishmania donovani. This study addresses whether a live attenuated centrin gene-deleted L. donovani (LdCen1(-/-)) parasite can persist and be both safe and protective in animals. LdCen1(-/-) has a defect in amastigote replication both in vitro and ex vivo in human macrophages. Safety was shown by the lack of parasites in spleen and liver in susceptible BALB/c mice, immune compromised SCID mice, and human VL model hamsters 10 wk after infection. Mice immunized with LdCen1(-/-) showed early clearance of virulent parasite challenge not seen in mice immunized with heat killed parasites. Upon virulent challenge, the immunized mice displayed in the CD4(+) T cell population a significant increase of single and multiple cytokine (IFN-gamma, IL-2, and TNF) producing cells and IFN-gamma/IL10 ratio. Immunized mice also showed increased IgG2a immunoglobulins and NO production in macrophages. These features indicated a protective Th1-type immune response. The Th1 response correlated with a significantly reduced parasite burden in the spleen and no parasites in the liver compared with naive mice 10 wk post challenge. Protection was observed, when challenged even after 16 wk post immunization, signifying a sustained immunity. Protection by immunization with attenuated parasites was also seen in hamsters. Immunization with LdCen1(-/-) also cross-protected mice against infection with L. braziliensis that causes mucocutaneous leishmaniasis. Results indicate that LdCen1(-/-) can be a safe and effective vaccine candidate against VL as well as mucocutaneous leishmaniasis causing parasites.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
140 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Previous results have shown that oral and intranasal administration of particulate Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis antigens (LaAg) partially protects mice against L. amazonensis infection. However, vaccination studies on species of the subgenus Viannia, the main causative agent of cutaneous and mucosal leishmaniasis in the Americas, have been hampered by the lack of easy-to-handle bio-models that accurately mimic the human disease. Recently, we demonstrated that the golden hamster is an appropriate model for studying the immunopathogenesis of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. (Viannia) braziliensis. Using the golden hamster model, our current study investigated whether the protective effect of intranasal immunisation with LaAg can be extended to L. braziliensis infection. Methodology/Principal Findings: Golden hamsters vaccinated with either two intranasal (IN) doses of LaAg (10 mg) or two intramuscular doses of LaAg (20 mg) were challenged 2 weeks post-vaccination with L. braziliensis. The results showed that IN immunisation with LaAg significantly reduced lesion growth and parasitic load as well as serum IgG and IgG2 levels. At the experimental endpoint on day 114 post-infection, IN-immunised hamsters that were considered protected expressed IFN-c and IL10 mRNA levels that returned to uninfected skin levels. In contrast to the nasal route, intramuscular (IM) immunisation failed to provide protection. Conclusions/Significance: These results demonstrate for the first time that the nasal route of immunisation can induce cross protection against L. braziliensis infection.
    PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 01/2015; 9(1):e3439. · 4.49 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Leishmania infantum is the obligatory intracellular parasite of mammalian macrophages and causes zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis (ZVL). The presence of infected dogs as the main reservoir host of ZVL is regarded as the most important potential risk for human infection. Thus the prevention of canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) is essential to stop the current increase of the Mediterranean visceral leishmaniasis. Recently considerable advances in achieving protective immunization of dogs and several important attempts for achieving an effective vaccine against CVL lead to attracting the scientists trust in its important role for eradication of ZVL. This paper highlights the recent advances in vaccination against canine visceral leishmaniasis from 2007 until now.
    Advances in preventive medicine. 01/2014; 2014:569193.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Leishmania and Leptomonas are protozoan parasites of the family Trypanosomatidae. Leishmania donovani causes the fatal visceral leishmaniasis (VL; kala-azar) in mammals and is transmitted by sand fly vector. Certain VL-cured human populations in India and Sudan develop post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) due to the same parasite. Although Leptomonas is parasitic mainly in insects, several recent reports on the clinical isolates of L. donovani from VL and PKDL patients in India confirm co-infection of Leptomonas seymouri, probably due to immune suppression in those individuals. Detection of L. seymouri in the in vitro cultures of L. donovani from clinical origin is difficult due to many similarities between L. seymouri and L. donovani. We describe here ways to detect L. seymouri and L. donovani in co-culture. In addition, based on our observation regarding the growth of L. seymouri in different culture conditions, we report here a novel procedure, which can selectively eliminate L. seymouri from the in vitro co-culture with L. donovani. This would be beneficial to researchers who prefer to deal with pure population of Leishmania parasites for various downstream immunological and genetic studies. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
    Parasitology International 01/2015; 64(4). · 2.11 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
41 Downloads
Available from
May 22, 2014