Article

Efficacy and safety of very-low-calorie diet in Taiwanese: A multicenter randomized, controlled trial

Department of Family Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Nutrition (Impact Factor: 3.05). 07/2009; 25(11-12):1129-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2009.02.008
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Very-low-calorie diets (VLCDs) are an effective method for weight reduction in Caucasians. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of two different VLCDs (450 or 800kcal/d) in obese Taiwanese.
132 participants with BMI > or =30kg/m(2) were randomized to two VLCD groups for body weight reduction for 12 weeks. Each group had 66 participants. Anthropometric and metabolic parameters were measured.
The intention-to-treat analysis revealed that the percentage change in body weight over the 12-week treatment period was -9.14% in the VLCD-450 group and -8.98% in the VLCD-800 group. A total of 27 (40.9%) participants in the VLCD-450 group and 29 (43.9%) participants in the VLCD-800 group achieved 10% or more weight loss at the end of treatment. The body weight, waist circumference, hip circumference, fat mass, blood pressure, triglycerides, and blood glucose were statistically improved from baseline but not between the two groups. The improvement rate of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) was 41.5% in the VLCD-450 group and 50.0% in the VLCD-800 group. The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the groups and no serious adverse events were reported in either group.
Both the VLCD-450 and 800kcal/d can effectively and safely reduce body weight and improve NAFLD in 12 weeks in obese Taiwanese participants. However, there is no additional benefit in prescribing the more restrictive diet intervention in Taiwanese.

2 Followers
 · 
133 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim: Very low‐energy diets are a weight loss strategy that utilises severe and controlled energy restriction to induce rapid weight loss. This review aimed to evaluate their use in terms of efficacy and safety, and to identify for whom they may be effective for weight loss.Methods: English‐language papers examining the use of very low‐energy diets for weight loss in adults with a body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 and published between March 2003 and March 2010 were retrieved from health and medical databases.Results: Eight randomised control trials, two cohort and six pre‐post studies were eligible for inclusion and were assessed for methodological quality and had data extracted. The greatest initial weight loss was −22 kg, after 16 weeks of a very low energy diet. Greatest weight loss after follow up was −13.1 ± 8.0 kg and 9.1 ± 9.7 kg (7.7 ± 8.1%) after 1 and 2 years, respectively. Studies comparing the effects in males versus females yielded conflicting results. Very low‐energy diets are effective for producing short‐term weight loss. However not all initial weight loss is maintained long term.Conclusion: Future studies using very low‐energy diets should conduct more rigorous analyses of dietary adherence and physical activity and should be required to document side effects experienced in order to identify how and for whom they are effective in facilitating long‐term weight loss in adults.
    Nutrition &amp Dietetics 06/2013; 70(2). DOI:10.1111/j.1747-0080.2012.01628.x · 0.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate safety, compliance, and efficacy, on weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors of a multiphasic dietary intervention based on meal replacements, including a period of very low calorie diet (VLCD) in a population of obese patients. Anthropometric parameters, blood tests (including insulin), dual-energy-X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and questionnaires for the assessment of safety and compliance before and after (phase I) a 30-day VLCD, 700 kcal/day, normoproteic, 50 g/day carbohydrate, four meal replacements; (phase II) a 30-day low calorie diet (LCD), 820 kcal/day, three meal replacements plus a protein plate; (phase III) 60-day LCD, 1,100 kcal/day, two meal replacements plus two protein plates and reintroduction of small amounts of carbohydrates; (phase IV) 60-day hypocaloric balanced diet (HBD), 1,200 kcal/day, one meal replacement, two protein plates and the reintroduction of carbohydrates. 24 patients (17 females, 7 males, mean BMI 33.8 ± 3.2 kg/m(2), mean age 35.1 ± 10.2 years) completed the study. The average weight loss was 15.4 ± 6.7 %, with a significant reduction of fat mass (from 32.8 ± 4.7 to 26.1 ± 6.3 % p < 0.05) and a relative increase of lean mass (from 61.9 ± 4.8 to 67.1 ± 5.9 % p < 0.05). An improvement of metabolic parameters and no variations of the liver and kidney functions were found. A high safety profile and an excellent dietary compliance were seen. The VLCD dietary program and the replacement dietary system described here is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated treatment for weight control.
    Endocrine 07/2014; 48(3). DOI:10.1007/s12020-014-0355-2 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite the overwhelming evidence supporting the effectiveness of antihypertensive medication, hypertension remains poorly controlled in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Lifestyle intervention studies reporting effects on blood pressure published from January 1977 to September 2012 were searched on various databases. From the 6211 references identified, 52 were included in the systematic review (12 024 participants) and 43 were included in the meta-analysis (in total 6779 participants). We calculated and pooled effect sizes in mmHg with random-effects models. We grouped interventions into behavioral counseling (1831 participants), dietary modification (1831 participants), physical activity (1014 participants) and multiple interventions (2103 participants). Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were used to evaluate origins of heterogeneity. Lifestyle interventions significantly lowered blood pressure levels in LMIC populations, including in total 6779 participants. The changes achieved in SBP (95% confidence interval) were: behavioral counseling -5.4 (-10.7, -0.0) mmHg, for dietary modification -3.5 (-5.4, -1.5) mmHg, for physical activity -11.4 (-16.0, -6.7) mmHg and for multiple interventions -6.0 (-8.9, -3.3) mmHg. The heterogeneity was high across studies and the quality was generally low. Subgroup analyses showed smaller samples reporting larger effect sizes; intervention lasting less than 6 months showed larger effect sizes and intention-to-treat analysis showed smaller effect sizes Lifestyle interventions may be of value in preventing and reducing blood pressure in LMICs. Nevertheless, the overall quality and sample size of the studies included were low. Improvements in the size and quality of studies evaluating lifestyle interventions are required.
    Journal of Hypertension 02/2014; DOI:10.1097/HJH.0000000000000136 · 4.22 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
92 Downloads
Available from
May 21, 2014