Access to Information Sources and Treatment Considerations Among Men With Local Stage Prostate Cancer

University of Washington Seattle, Seattle, Washington, United States
Urology (Impact Factor: 2.13). 08/2009; 74(3):509-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.01.090
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To determine the role of information sources in the treatment decision-making process of men diagnosed with local stage prostate cancer. Diagnosed men have access to a large number of information sources about therapy, including print and broadcast media, the Internet, books, and friends with the disease.
Prospective survey of men with local stage prostate cancer in 3 geographically separate regions was carried out. Most men were surveyed after diagnosis but before starting therapy.
On average, men with local prostate cancer consulted nearly 5 separate sources of information before treatment. The most common source of information was the patient's physician (97%), followed by lay-literature (pamphlets, videos) (76%), other health professionals (71%), friends with prostate cancer (67%), and the Internet (58%). Most men rated the sources they consulted as helpful. Consulting the Internet was associated with considering more treatment options. Several information sources were significantly associated with considering particular treatments, but the magnitude of association was small in relation to patient age, comorbidity, and Gleason score. More than 70% of men stated that they were considering or planning only one type of therapy.
Men with local stage prostate cancer consult a wide range of information sources. Nonphysician information sources appear to influence their treatment considerations, but to a smaller degree than clinical factors.

Download full-text


Available from: Stephen K. Van Den Eeden, Jul 04, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The rise in Internet use for seeking health information raises questions about the role the Internet may play in how patients make medical decisions. To examine Internet use and perceived importance of different sources of information by patients making 9 specific medical decisions covering prescription medication initiation, cancer screening, and elective surgery. National sample of US adults identified by random-digit dialing. Cross-sectional survey conducted between November 2006 and May 2007. The final sample comprised 2575 English-speaking US adults aged 40 y and older who had either undergone 1 of 9 medical procedures or tests or talked with a health care provider about doing so during the previous 2 y. Participants indicated if they or other family members used the Internet to seek information related to each of the specific medical decisions and rated how important the health care provider, the Internet (if used), family and friends, and the media (newspapers, magazines, and television) were in providing information to help make the medical decision. Use of the Internet for information related to specific decisions among adults 40 y and older was generally low (28%) but varied across decisions, from 17% for breast cancer screening to 48% for hip/knee replacement. Internet use was higher at younger ages, rising from 14% among those aged 70 y and older to 38% for those aged 40 to 49 y. Internet users consistently rated health care providers as the most influential source of information for medical decisions, followed by the Internet, family and friends, and media. Telephone surveys are limited by coverage and nonresponse. The authors excluded health-related Internet use not associated with the 9 target decisions. A minority of patients reported using the Internet to make specific common medical decisions, but use varied widely by type of decision. Perhaps reflecting perceived risk and uncertainty, use was lowest for screening decisions and highest for surgical decisions.
    Medical Decision Making 09/2010; 30(5 Suppl):106S-114S. DOI:10.1177/0272989X10377661 · 2.27 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Information ist eine grundlegende Voraussetzung für die Beteiligung von Patienten an medizinischen Entscheidungen. Krebsinformation im Internet hat klassische Medien wie etwa Broschüren nicht abgelöst, aber vom Nutzungsumfang her längst überholt. Zugang haben inzwischen auch viele Menschen höheren Alters; als Barrieren bleiben ein geringes Haushaltseinkommen und ein niedriger Bildungsstand. An Krebsinformation gibt es nicht mehr nur textlastige Angebote mit Faktenwissen: Foren, Chats und Blogs dienen Betroffenen zum Austausch von Erfahrung, sie schätzen die Möglichkeit, individuelle Fragen stellen zu können. Krebsinformation über neue Kanäle bietet all dies und gewinnt deshalb an Bedeutung: Beispiele sind die Videoplattform YouTube oder soziale Netzwerke wie Facebook. Viele Organisationen aus der Onkologie präsentieren ihre Informationsangebote im „Web 2.0“, ebenso vertreten sind Verfechter fragwürdiger Heilmethoden. Die Weiterentwicklung der Qualitätssicherung ist, wie im Handlungsfeld 4 des Nationalen Krebsplans thematisiert, daher unabdingbar. Wer wann welche Art von Krebsinformation benötigt, und auf welche Barrieren Menschen bei der Informationssuche weiter stoßen werden – diese Evaluation ist Voraussetzung für die Weiterentwicklung bedarfsgerechter Internetangebote.
    Der Onkologe 05/2012; 18(5). DOI:10.1007/s00761-012-2229-7 · 0.13 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We evaluated pathways linking physicians' decision-making style with cancer survivors' health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We analyzed survey data from 623 survivors diagnosed with leukemia, colorectal, or bladder cancer in Northern California, 2-5 years prior to the study. Of these, 395 reported making a medical decision in the past 12 months and were asked about their physician's decision-making style. We evaluated the association of physician style with proximal communication outcomes (trust and participation self-efficacy), intermediate cognitive outcomes (perceived control and uncertainty), and distal health outcomes (physical and mental HRQOL). Overall, 54% of survivors reported a sub-optimal decision-making style for their physician. With the exception of physical health, physician style was associated with all proximal, intermediate, and distal outcomes (p< or =0.01). We identified two significant pathways by which a participatory physician style may be associated with survivors' mental health: (1) by increasing survivors' participation self-efficacy and thereby enhancing their perceptions of personal control (p<0.01); (2) by enhancing survivors' level of trust and thereby reducing their perceptions of uncertainty (p<0.05). A participatory physician style may improve survivors' mental health by a complex two-step mechanism of improving survivors' proximal communication and intermediate cognitive outcomes. Physicians who adopt a participatory decision-making style are likely to facilitate patient empowerment and enhance patients' HRQOL.
    Patient Education and Counseling 11/2009; 77(3):404-12. DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.004 · 2.60 Impact Factor