Content uploaded by Krzysztof Krawczyk
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Krzysztof Krawczyk on Feb 17, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
Available via license: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
Journal
of
Biotechnology
192
(2014)
62–65
Contents
lists
available
at
ScienceDirect
Journal
of
Biotechnology
j
ourna
l
ho
me
pa
ge:
www.elsevier.com/locate/jbiotec
Short
communication
High
salt
buffer
improves
integrity
of
RNA
after
fluorescence-activated
cell
sorting
of
intracellular
labeled
cells
Helén
Nilsson∗,1,
Krzysztof
M.
Krawczyk1,
Martin
E.
Johansson.
Department
of
Laboratory
Medicine,
Center
for
Molecular
Pathology,
Lund
University,
Sweden
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Article
history:
Received
17
June
2014
Received
in
revised
form
10
September
2014
Accepted
19
September
2014
Available
online
30
September
2014
Keywords:
RNA
integrity
Intracellular
antibody
labeling
Fluorescence-activated
cell
sorting
Fixation
NaCl
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Over
the
past
years,
massive
progress
has
been
made
in
the
ability
to
collect
large-scale
gene
expres-
sion
data
from
a
limited
sample
size.
Combined
with
improvements
in
multiplex
flow
cytometry-based
techniques,
this
has
made
it
possible
to
isolate
and
characterize
specific
cellular
subtypes
within
heteroge-
neous
populations,
with
a
great
impact
on
our
understanding
of
different
biological
processes.
However,
sorting
based
on
intracellular
markers
requires
fixation
and
permeabilization
of
samples,
and
very
often
the
integrity
of
RNA
molecules
is
compromised
during
this
process.
Many
attempts
have
been
made
to
improve
the
quality
of
nucleic
acids
from
such
samples,
but
RNA
degradation
still
remains
a
limiting
factor
for
downstream
analyses.
Here
we
present
a
method
to
isolate
high
quality
RNA
from
cells
that
have
been
fixed,
permeabilized,
intracellularly
labeled
and
sorted.
By
performing
all
incubation
steps
in
the
presence
of
a
high
salt
buffer,
RNA
degradation
was
avoided
and
samples
with
remarkable
integrity
were
obtained.
This
procedure
offers
a
straightforward
and
very
affordable
technique
to
retrieve
high
quality
RNA
from
isolated
cell
populations,
which
increases
the
possibilities
to
characterize
gene
expres-
sion
profiles
of
subpopulations
from
mixed
samples,
a
technique
with
implications
in
a
broad
range
of
research
fields.
©
2014
The
Authors.
Published
by
Elsevier
B.V.
This
is
an
open
access
article
under
the
CC
BY-NC-ND
license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
1.
Introduction
Awareness
regarding
the
importance
of
cellular
heterogeneity
in
complex
tissues
and
samples
is
increasing,
and
much
knowledge
would
be
gained
would
it
be
possible
to
obtain
high
quality
RNA
from
cells
isolated
from
heterogeneous
populations,
for
example
from
primary
tissue.
Flow
cytometry
based
techniques
are
pow-
erful
tools
for
isolation
of
cells,
but
depend
heavily
on
labeling
of
extracellularly
facing
antigens
for
retrieval
of
intact
RNA.
Intracel-
lular
labeling
of
fixed
and
permeabilized
cells
allows
for
separation
of
cell
populations
using
fluorescence-activated
cell
sorting
(FACS).
The
necessary
fixation
and
permeabilization
steps
before
intra-
cellular
antibody
staining
however
has
profound
effects
on
RNA
integrity
(Russell
et
al.,
2013).
The
single
stranded
nature
of
RNA
molecules
renders
them
sensitive
to
degradation,
and
crosslink-
ing
resulting
from
fixation
has
well
known
detrimental
effects
on
RNA
integrity
and
often
precludes
downstream
analyzes
such
as
∗Corresponding
author
at:
Center
for
Molecular
Pathology,
Lund
University,
Department
of
Laboratory
Medicine
Malmö,
Skåne
University
Hospital,
Jan
Walden-
ströms
gata
59,
20502
Malmö,
Sweden.
Tel.:
+46
040336269;
fax:
+46
040337063.
E-mail
address:
helen.nilsson@med.lu.se
(H.
Nilsson).
1These
authors
contributed
equally
to
this
paper.
gene
arrays
and
quantitative
real-time
PCR
(QPCR)
(Auer
et
al.,
2003;
Fleige
and
Pfaffl,
2006).
Several
attempts
have
been
made
to
improve
protocols
in
order
to
isolate
RNA
from
sorted
cells
with
acceptable
quality,
however,
RNA
integrity
values
remain
problem-
atically
low
(Diez
et
al.,
1999;
Nishimoto
et
al.,
2007;
Iglesias-Ussel
et
al.,
2013).
Different
RNA-preserving
fixation
solutions
has
also
been
developed,
but
these
are
often
costly
and
not
compatible
with
antibody
labeling
(Zaitoun
et
al.,
2010).
Here
we
present
a
method
to
obtain
high
quality
RNA
from
intracellularly
labeled
and
sorted
cells
in
a
straightforward
and
affordable
way.
We
show
that
the
presence
of
a
high-salt
buffer
protects
RNA
from
degradation
during
antibody
staining
and
sor-
ting
steps,
which
enables
the
collection
of
high
quality
RNA
from
cells
sorted
based
on
intracellular
markers.
2.
Materials
and
methods
2.1.
Cell
culture
786-O
and
Jurkat
cells
were
cultured
in
DMEM
high
glucose
(Thermo
scientific)
supplemented
with
10%
fetal
bovine
serum
and
1%
Penicillin-Streptomycin
solution
(Thermo
scientific)
at
37 ◦C
and
5%
CO2.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.09.016
0168-1656/©
2014
The
Authors.
Published
by
Elsevier
B.V.
This
is
an
open
access
article
under
the
CC
BY-NC-ND
license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
H.
Nilsson
et
al.
/
Journal
of
Biotechnology
192
(2014)
62–65
63
Fig.
1.
(A)
Electropherograms
from
Bioanalyzer
showing
the
poor
integrity
of
RNA
isolated
from
cells
after
fixation,
permeabilization,
antibody
labeling
and
sorting.
Fixation
and
permeabilization
alone
(B),
as
well
as
fixation
and
permeabilization
followed
by
sorting
(C)
results
in
RNA
of
high
quality.
(D)
Degraded
RNA
from
cells
isolated
after
fixation,
permeabilization,
and
antibody
labeling.
2.2.
Fixation
and
permeabilization
At
90%
confluency
cells
were
trypsinized
and
counted.
Cells
were
fixed
in
4%
paraformaldehyde
solution
(PFA)
for
10
min
at
room
temperature.
Fixed
cells
were
kept
on
ice
for
1
min
before
permeabilization
by
addition
of
ice-cold
100%
methanol
to
a
final
concentration
of
90%.
Cells
were
subsequently
incubated
on
ice
for
30
min
and
stored
at
−20 ◦C.
2.3.
Antibody
staining
Fixed
and
permeabilized
cells
kept
in
methanol
were
cen-
trifuged
for
5
min
at
1000
×
g
at
4◦C.
Supernatant
was
removed
and
cells
were
washed
in
PBS
or
2
M
NaCl
in
PBS
to
remove
the
remaining
methanol.
Cells
were
incubated
in
blocking
buffer
(0.5%
BSA
in
PBS,
with
or
without
2
M
NaCl
for
10
min
in
room
tempera-
ture.
Staining
with
primary
conjugated
anti-human
cytokeratin
7/8
antibody
(Alexa
Fluor
647,
clone
CAM5.2,
BD
Biosciences)
was
per-
formed
for
20
min
at
room
temperature
in
blocking
buffer.
Excess
antibody
was
washed
away
using
blocking
buffer.
Antibody
inten-
sity
was
analyzed
on
a
FACS
Calibur
(BD
Biosciences).
2.4.
Fluorescence
activated
cell
sorting
For
cell
sorting
a
FACSAria
Cell
Sorter
(BD
Biosciences)
was
used.
As
a
precaution
to
avoid
RNA
degradation
cells
were
collected
in
4
M
NaCl
and
1%
BSA
in
PBS.
2.5.
RNA
isolation
and
quality
control
RNA
was
isolated
using
Qiagen’s
FFPE
kit
according
to
the
man-
ufacturer’s
protocol.
For
all
samples
the
highest
recommended
volume
of
PKD
buffer
(240
L)
was
used
to
avoid
interference
from
remnants
of
high
salt
buffer.
RNA
integrity
was
assessed
with
Agi-
lent
RNA
6000
Nano
kit
and
Agilent
2100
Bioanalyzer
(Agilent
Technologies).
2.6.
cDNA
synthesis
and
quantitative
real-time
PCR
cDNA
synthesis
was
performed
using
MultiScribe
Reverse
Transcriptase
enzyme
and
random
hexamers
(Applied
Biosystems).
Quantitative
real-time
PCR
was
performed
with
SYBR
Green
PCR
Master
Mix
on
a
7300
Real-Time
PCR
System
(Applied
Biosystems).
The
comparative
Ct
method
was
used
to
quantify
relative
RNA
levels
and
three
separate
housekeeping
genes
(HMBS,
RPL13A,
YWHAZ)
were
used
for
normalization.
Primer
sequences
used
were
CK8
forward:
5-AGGGCTGACCGACGAGAT-3,
reverse:
5-
CACCACAGATGTGCTCGAGA-3,
HMBS
forward:
5-GGCAATGCGG-
CTGCAA-3,
reverse:
5-GGGTACCCACGCGAATCAC-3,
RPL13A
forward:
5-CCTGGAGGAGAAGAGGAAAGAGA-3,
reverse:
5-
TTGAGGACCTCTGTGTATTTGTCAA-3,
YWHAZ
forward:
5-ACTTTT-
GGTACATTGTGGCTTCAA-3,
reverse:
5-CCGCCAGGACAAA-
CCAGTAT-3.
3.
Results
and
discussion
3.1.
RNA
integrity
is
lost
during
antibody
incubation
of
fixed
and
permeabilized
cells
The
detrimental
effects
on
RNA
integrity
caused
by
formalin
crosslinking
and
antibody
incubation
steps
have
made
it
difficult
to
obtain
RNA
of
adequate
quality
from
complex
samples
where
fixation
and
intracellular
labeling
is
required
before
cell
sorting.
To
illustrate
this
problem,
we
performed
the
procedure
in
the
human
renal
carcinoma
cell
line
786-O.
Cells
were
fixed
in
4%
paraformaldehyde,
permeabilized
using
methanol
and
labeled
with
a
primary
Alexa
647
conjugated
cytokeratin
7/8
antibody
(CK7/8),
that
should
result
in
intracellular
staining
of
these
cells.
Positive
cells
were
collected
using
FACS
and
RNA
was
isolated.
The
qual-
ity
of
the
obtained
RNA
was
determined
on
a
Bioanalyzer.
The
RNA
integrity
number,
or
RIN
value,
obtained
from
the
Bioanalyzer
gives
a
measurement
of
the
degree
of
degradation
that
has
occurred,
where
a
RIN
value
of
10
corresponds
to
intact
RNA
(Schroeder
et
al.,
64
H.
Nilsson
et
al.
/
Journal
of
Biotechnology
192
(2014)
62–65
2006).
As
shown
in
Fig.
1A,
the
process
of
fixation,
permeabiliza-
tion,
antibody
labeling
and
sorting
resulted
in
RNA
with
a
RIN
value
as
low
as
2.1.
We
next
evaluated
the
effect
of
each
of
these
steps
on
RNA
integrity.
Fixation
and
permeabilization
alone
had
no
negative
effect
(Fig.
1B);
also
sorting
of
fixed
and
permeabilized
cells
could
be
performed
without
compromising
RNA
quality
(Fig.
1C).
How-
ever,
RIN-values
of
RNA
from
cells
that
were
fixed,
permeabilized
and
incubated
with
antibody
were
considerably
lower
(Fig.
1D),
indicating
that
the
blocking
and
antibody
incubation
steps
had
a
detrimental
effect
on
RNA
integrity.
3.2.
Incubation
in
high
salt
buffer
preserves
RNA
integrity
It
has
previously
been
reported
that
antibody
incubation
in
a
high
salt
buffer
improves
the
quality
of
RNA
obtained
after
laser
micro-dissection
of
specifically
stained
cell
populations
(Brown
and
Smith,
2009).
This
method
yielded
RNA
of
better
quality
than
the
commercially
available
RNA
preserving
agent
RNAlater,
and
enabled
prolonged
antibody
incubation
times
without
compro-
mising
RNA
integrity.
We
therefore
set
out
to
test
whether
this
method
could
also
be
applicable
on
cells
isolated
by
FACS.
In
order
to
test
this
method,
we
performed
blocking
and
antibody
labeling
in
the
presence
of
2
M
NaCl.
RIN-values
of
RNA
iso-
lated
from
cells
incubated
under
these
conditions
were
markedly
improved,
as
illustrated
in
Fig.
2A.
Also
when
the
cells
were
sorted
after
fixation,
permeabilization,
blocking
and
antibody
labeling
at
room
temperature
in
high
salt
buffer,
RNA
with
RIN
values
as
high
as
7.9
were
obtained
(Fig.
2B).
These
results
indicate
that
the
high
salt
buffer
protects
RNA
from
fragmentation,
result-
ing
in
distinctly
improved
RNA
quality.
No
difference
in
total
RNA
yield
was
observed
whether
or
not
the
high
salt
buffer
was
used.
3.3.
High
salt
buffer
do
not
have
major
impact
on
antibody
binding
efficiency
Antibody
binding
to
specific
epitopes
can
be
sensitive
to
changes
induced
by
fixation
and
other
procedures.
To
assure
that
the
high
salt
buffer
did
not
compromise
the
specificity
or
affinity
of
the
anti-
body,
786-O
cells
were
stained
with
the
CK7/8
antibody
in
PBS
or
high
salt
buffer,
and
the
intensity
of
the
staining
was
analyzed
by
Fig.
2.
Antibody
incubation
of
fixed
and
permeabilized
cells
performed
in
the
pres-
ence
of
high
salt
buffer
results
in
RNA
of
high
quality
(A),
also
when
cells
are
sorted
after
labeling
(B).
flow
cytometry.
786-O
cells
stained
in
PBS
buffer
were
positive
for
CK7/8,
as
expected.
Antibody
incubation
in
high
salt
buffer
resulted
in
a
slight
decrease
in
staining
intensity,
but
the
same
proportion
of
cells
were
positive,
and
the
signal
was
still
well
separated
from
the
signal
of
unstained
cells
(Fig.
3A
and
B).
In
contrast
to
786-O
cells,
human
T
lymphocyte
Jurkat
cells
do
not
express
CK7/8,
and
should
thus
be
negative
for
this
antibody.
As
expected,
all
Jurkat
cells
were
negative
for
this
antibody
regardless
of
whether
the
antibody
incubation
occurred
in
PBS
or
high
salt
buffer,
indicating
that
high
salt
buffer
did
not
induce
unspecific
staining
(data
not
shown).
Fig.
3.
Flow
cytometry
results
showing
the
intensity
of
CK7/8
Alexa
647
antibody
staining
of
positive
(red)
786-O
cells,
where
antibody
incubation
was
performed
in
PBS
(A)
or
high
salt
buffer
(B),
compared
to
unstained
cells
(blue).
(For
interpretation
of
the
references
to
color
in
this
figure
legend,
the
reader
is
referred
to
the
web
version
of
the
article.)
H.
Nilsson
et
al.
/
Journal
of
Biotechnology
192
(2014)
62–65
65
Fig.
4.
Electropherograms
of
RNA
isolated
from
a
mixture
of
786-O
and
Jurkat
cells
after
fixation,
permeabilization
and
CK7/8-antibody
labeling
followed
by
sorting
based
on
CK7/8
positivity.
Both
CK7/8-positive
(A)
and
negative
(B)
populations
have
high
RIN
values.
(C)
QPCR
results
showing
expression
of
CK8
in
the
population
that
stained
positive
for
this
antibody,
while
negative
cells
express
very
low
levels
of
this
marker.
3.4.
High
salt
buffer
enables
preparation
of
high
quality
RNA
from
a
specific
cell
population
identified
and
collected
by
FACS
after
intracellular
antibody
labeling
To
illustrate
possible
applications
of
this
improved
method,
we
prepared
a
mixture
of
the
two
different
cell
types,
786-O
and
Jurkat
cells.
Cells
were
fixed,
permeabilized
and
stained
with
the
CK7/8
antibody
in
the
presence
of
high
salt
buffer
as
described
above.
Using
FACS,
positive
(786-O)
and
negative
(Jurkat)
cells
were
sepa-
rated
and
RNA
was
isolated
from
both
populations
(Fig.
4A
and
B).
Expression
of
cytokeratin
8
was
analyzed
in
these
samples
using
QPCR,
confirming
the
separation
of
the
two
populations
(Fig.
4C).
This
experiment
also
validates
that
the
quality
of
the
isolated
RNA
is
sufficient
for
cDNA
synthesis
and
QPCR
reactions.
An
additional
advantage
using
this
protocol
is
the
possibility
to
store
samples
before
analysis
by
FACS,
enabling
collection
of
large
datasets
that
can
be
analyzed
in
parallel.
It
also
allows
for
samples
to
be
shipped
to
other
locations
for
analysis,
something
that
can
be
useful
in
cases
of
multi-centric
collaborations
or
when
the
FACS
analysis
is
performed
at
distant
core
facilities.
4.
Conclusion
This
improved
method
opens
up
for
low-cost
FACS
based
cell
sorting
of
different
subtypes
of
cells
from
complex
populations,
using
intracellular
labeling
of
cells.
The
protocol
results
in
high
quality
RNA
suitable
for
further
downstream
characterization
by
a
broad
repertoire
of
molecular
biology
platforms.
Acknowledgments
The
authors
would
like
to
thank
Per
Anders
Bertilsson
at
Lund
University
Flow
Cytometry
Facility
for
excellent
technical
assis-
tance.
This
work
was
funded
by
Marianne
&
Marcus
Wallenberg
Foundation
(MMW2011.0078),
the
National
Association
against
Kidney
Disease
(NF130909),
Governmental
funding
of
Clinical
Research
within
the
National
Health
Service
(ALF)
(M2011/1816),
SUS
Foundations
and
Donations
(314650),
and
the
Malmö
General
Hospital
Research
Fund
(ASM131203MJ)
for
cancer
research.
References
Auer,
H.,
Lyianarachchi,
S.,
Newsom,
D.,
Klisovic,
M.I.,
Marcucci,
G.,
Kornacker,
K.,
2003.
Chipping
away
at
the
chip
bias:
RNA
degradation
in
microarray
analysis.
Nat.
Genet.
35
(4),
292–293.
Brown,
A.L.,
Smith,
D.W.,
2009.
Improved
RNA
preservation
for
immunolabeling
and
laser
microdissection.
RNA
15
(12),
2364–2374.
Diez,
C.,
Bertsch,
G.,
Simm,
A.,
1999.
Isolation
of
full-size
mRNA
from
cells
sorted
by
flow
cytometry.
J.
Biochem.
Biophys.
Methods
40
(3),
69–80.
Fleige,
S.,
Pfaffl,
M.W.,
2006.
RNA
integrity
and
the
effect
on
the
real-time
qRT-PCR
performance.
Mol.
Asp.
Med.
27
(2-3),
126–139.
Iglesias-Ussel,
M.,
Marchionni,
L.,
Romerio,
F.,
2013.
Isolation
of
microarray-
quality
RNA
from
primary
human
cells
after
intracellular
immunostaining
and
fluorescence-activated
cell
sorting.
J.
Immunol.
Methods
391
(1–2),
22–30.
Nishimoto,
K.P.,
Newkirk,
D.,
Hou,
S.,
Fruehauf,
J.,
Nelson,
E.L.,
2007.
Fluorescence
activated
cell
sorting
(FACS)
using
RNAlater
to
minimize
RNA
degradation
and
perturbation
of
mRNA
expression
from
cells
involved
in
initial
host
microbe
interactions.
J.
Microbiol.
Methods
70
(1),
205–208.
Russell,
J.N.,
Clements,
J.E.,
Gama,
L.,
2013.
Quantitation
of
gene
expression
in
formaldehyde-fixed
and
fluorescence-activated
sorted
cells.
PLOS
ONE
8
(9),
e73849.
Schroeder,
A.,
Mueller,
O.,
Stocker,
S.,
Salowsky,
R.,
Leiber,
M.,
Gassmann,
M.,
Light-
foot,
S.,
Menzel,
W.,
Granzow,
M.,
Ragg,
T.,
2006.
The
RIN:
an
RNA
integrity
number
for
assigning
integrity
values
to
RNA
measurements.
BMC
Mol.
Biol.
7,
3.
Zaitoun,
I.,
Erickson,
C.S.,
Schell,
K.,
Epstein,
M.L.,
2010.
Use
of
RNAlater
in
fluorescence-activated
cell
sorting
(FACS)
reduces
the
fluorescence
from
GFP
but
not
from
DsRed.
BMC
Res.
Notes
3,
328.