Stepped-dose versus full-dose efavirenz for HIV infection and neuropsychiatric adverse events: a randomized trial.

Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Universidad de Sevilla, and Hospital Universitario de Valme, Seville, Spain.
Annals of internal medicine (Impact Factor: 16.1). 09/2009; 151(3):149-56.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT More than 50% of patients who start efavirenz treatment develop limiting neuropsychiatric adverse events (NPAEs).
To assess whether stepwise dosing of efavirenz decreases the incidence and severity of NPAEs while maintaining virologic efficacy.
Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.
7 HIV clinics in Spain.
114 HIV-infected patients eligible for efavirenz treatment plus 2 nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors.
Random assignment (by computer-generated sequence) to receive efavirenz, 200 mg/d on days 1 through 6, 400 mg/d on days 7 through 13, and 600 mg/d on day 14 and after, or efavirenz, 600 mg/d, from day 1. Both groups received 2 nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors chosen by the patient's physician.
Neuropsychiatric symptoms and sleep quality were assessed by questionnaires at 0, 7, 14, and 30 days. The primary outcome was efavirenz-related NPAEs during the first 2 weeks, and the secondary outcome was plasma HIV RNA level at 24 weeks.
Compared with the stepped-dose group, the full-dose group had higher incidence and severity of dizziness (66.0% vs. 32.8%; P = 0.001), hangover (45.8% vs. 20.7%; P = 0.008), impaired concentration (22.9% vs. 8.9%; P = 0.038), and hallucinations (6.1% vs. 0%; P = 0.056) during the first week. From week 2, the incidence of efavirenz-related NPAEs was similar in both groups, although the severity was greater in the full-dose group. Virologic and immunologic efficacy seemed similar in both groups.
The sample size was calculated on the basis of a high absolute difference in rates of efavirenz-related NPAEs between the groups. A lower absolute difference and a larger sample size could have made the differences between groups reach statistical significance beyond the first week. In addition, the sample size does not allow confirmation of similar efficacy between treatment groups.
Stepwise dose escalation of efavirenz over 2 weeks reduces the incidence and intensity of efavirenz-related NPAEs while maintaining efficacy.
Consejería de Salud, Junta de Andalucía, Spain.

Download full-text


Available from: Antonio Rivero, Dec 12, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: People with HIV infection have several risk factors for developing neuropsychiatric adverse events: preexisting conditions, HIV disease stage, and antiretroviral treatment. The most widely used system for assessing neuropsychiatric adverse events in clinical trials is the US Division of AIDS severity grading scale, from Grade 1 (mild) to Grade 4 (life-threatening). First-line treatment with efavirenz has been associated with higher rates of neuropsychiatric adverse events than several other antiretrovirals. A MEDLINE search identified 17 randomized clinical trials of first-line HAART with two nucleoside analogs plus efavirenz, of which 13 reported neuropsychiatric adverse events using the Grade 1-4 system. The percentage of patients with graded neuropsychiatric adverse events, and the system used for analysis, was compared across the trials. Of the 13 trials identified, there were five different methods used to report neuropsychiatric adverse events: Grade 1-4 all, Grade 1-4 drug related, Grade 2-4 all, Grade 2-4 drug related, Grade 3-4 all, Grade 3-4 drug related, and adverse events leading to discontinuation. In addition, three trials used questionnaire-based methods instead of the Division of AIDS grading system. There were a significantly higher percentage of patients with Grade 1-4 neurological or psychiatric adverse events in the efavirenz versus comparator arms in the DMP-006, TMC278-C204, and STARTMRK trials. There were generally too few patients with each individual neuropsychiatric adverse event to allow meaningful comparisons of treatment arms. There were no significant differences in Grade 3 or 4 neuropsychiatric adverse events between the treatment arms in the ACTG 5142 or 2NN trials. In summary, there is a wide range of different systems used to report neuropsychiatric adverse events in HIV clinical trials. Use of a standardized endpoint would improve the interpretability of results across clinical trials.
    AIDS reviews 01/2010; 12(2):67-75. · 4.02 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While combination antiretroviral therapy (CART) has decreased the incidence of HIV-associated dementia, the severest form of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND), mild neurocognitive disorder and asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment continue to persist, and there is evidence that neurocognitive deficits present even in acute HIV infection. Recent studies demonstrate that CART regimens with higher central nervous system (CNS) penetration effectiveness ranks may improve neurocognitive functioning. Considering these factors, earlier treatment initiation may be considered to protect the CNS. The functional impact of HAND on daily activities should be monitored. Areas that need further research are potential neurotoxicity of antiretrovirals, the eradication of potential latent reservoirs in the brain, when to start treatment to protect the CNS, and the neurological impact of HIV on the CNS in acute infection.
    Current HIV/AIDS Reports 05/2010; 7(2):85-91. DOI:10.1007/s11904-010-0042-8
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Concerns regarding the use of efavirenz in patients with a history of mental illness may predispose clinicians to not offer this agent to psychiatrically ill populations in spite of the convenience of once daily dosing, which can result in improved adherence in these at-risk populations. This systematic review examines the current data regarding the neuropsychiatric effects of efavirenz, and also attempts to provide guidance to clinicians using efavirenz to treat patients with mental illness. The review identified high rates of neuropsychiatric side effects including vivid dreams, insomnia and mood changes in approximately 50% of patients who initiate efavirenz. The effects begin quickly, commonly peak in the first 2 weeks, and are generally mild and transient in nature. Isolated case reports and uncontrolled data suggest higher rates of severe side effects; however, there is no clear evidence of a broadly increased risk of suicide or dangerous behavior for patients taking efavirenz as part of their antiretroviral regimen.
    AIDS and Behavior 04/2011; 15(8):1803-18. DOI:10.1007/s10461-011-9939-5 · 3.49 Impact Factor