Article

An analysis of the VOSP Silhouettes Test with neurological patients

Psychology Science 01/2006;
Source: DOAJ

ABSTRACT An item analysis of the Silhouettes, part of the Visual Object and Space Perception Battery, was performed using the test protocols of 266 German-speaking neurological patients with a mean age of 54.8 years, all of them presenting some sort of brain pathology. The sample yielded a mean test score of 17.0 (SD = 4.6). The two subsets of 15 animals and 15 objects were only moderately correlated (0.45), so the inclusion into a single scale is questionable. Other reliability estimates were also rather low (0.62 to 0.77). Moreover, gross deviations in item difficulty were obtained with this sample; scoring rules were found to be insufficiently explicit. Despite moderate rank correlations with other instruments (Hooper VOT: 0.65; WAIS-R Block Design: 0.57; neuropsychological screening battery SKT: -0.45), the psychometric properties obtained with this sample must be considered to be insufficient.

0 0
 · 
1 Bookmark
 · 
113 Views
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The visuo-perceptual abilities of three cases with unilateral lesions of the right hemisphere selected on the basis of the co-occurrence of impaired performance on a test of visual object perception and normal performance on a test of shape discrimination are reported. Their performance was also impaired on other tests of visual object recognition in which the perceptual difficulty of the task was manipulated by obscuring the salient features of the representation. At the same time it was found that on a variety of other tests of visual-sensory processing their performance was entirely normal, as was their performance on tests of visual semantic knowledge, tests that were failed by a patient with a visual associative agnosia. It is argued that this syndrome has all the hallmarks of an apperceptive agnosia, a failure of perceptual categorisation in which the physical identity of the object is specified. The two discontinuities between visual-sensory processing, perceptual categorisation and visual-semantic processing are discussed in terms of a 2 categorical stage model of object recognition.
    Cortex 04/1988; 24(1):13-32. · 6.16 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Category-specific deficits for living things have been explained variously as an artifact due to differences in the familiarity of concepts in different categories (E. Funnell & J. Sheridan, 1992) or as the result of an underlying impairment to sensory knowledge (E. K. Warrington & T. Shallice, 1984). Efforts to test these hypotheses empirically have been hindered by the shortcomings of currently available stimulus materials. A new set of stimuli are described that the authors developed to overcome the limitations of existing sets. The set consists of color photographs, matched across categories for familiarity and visual complexity. This set was used to test the semantic knowledge of a classic patient, J.B.R. (E. K. Warrington & T. Shallice, 1984). The results suggest that J.B.R.'s deficit for living things cannot be explained in terms of familiarity effects and that the most severely affected categories are those whose identification is most dependent on sensory information.
    Neuropsychology 07/1998; 12(3):367-79. · 3.58 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The psychometric properties of the Visual Object and Space Perception Battery (Warrington & James, 1991) were examined in a sample of 111 healthy, older Americans. The potential for culture-related differences and other idiosyncrasies in the standardization samples of British medical patients compelled evaluation of the normative data for use in the United States. Using the normative data provided by the test manual, specificity of the tests ranged from 68–98%. Analysis of variance revealed age-related differences on five of the eight subtests, with subjects age < 70 outperforming subjects age > 70 (p < .001); normative data are provided for these groups. Internal consistency reliabilities (coefficient alpha) ranged from adequate (> .70) to poor (< .30). Test users should be alert to potential errors in the test materials on the Position Discrimination subtest.
    Clinical Neuropsychologist - CLIN NEUROPSYCHOL. 01/1997; 11(4):436-442.

Full-text

View
2 Downloads
Available from