Article

Revisión de los principales modelos teóricos explicativos del maltrato infantil

Enseñanza e Investigación en Psicología 01/2006;
Source: DOAJ

ABSTRACT En este artículo se describen las cinco formas de maltrato infantil y los principales modelos teóricos que a lo largo de los últimos treinta años han tratado de proporcionar explicaciones sobre los fenómenos de abuso sexual, maltrato físico, abandono físico, maltrato emocional y abandono emocional.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
408 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article applies a developmental-ecological perspective to the question of the etiology of physical child abuse and neglect by organizing the paper around a variety of "contexts of maltreatment." The roles of parent and child characteristics and processes are considered ("developmental context"), including an examination of intergenerational transmission. The "immediate interactional context" of maltreatment, which focuses on the parenting and parent-child interactional processes associated with abuse and neglect, is analyzed. Finally, the "broader context" is discussed with 3 specific subsections dealing with the community, cultural, and evolutionary contexts of child maltreatment. Implications for intervention are considered and future research directions are outlined.
    Psychological Bulletin 12/1993; 114(3):413-34. · 15.58 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The childhood experience of physical abuse is believed to be associated with parental child abuse. However, not all parents with a childhood history of abuse are abusive, indicating that factors such as social support may buffer the effects of childhood abuse. To examine the role of social support in the discrimination of physical child abusers and nonabusers, the Childhood Social Network Questionnaire (CSNQ) and the Child Abuse Potential (CAP) Inventory were given to matched groups of physical child abusers with a childhood history of physical abuse, nonabusers with a childhood history of physical abuse, and nonabusers without a childhood history of physical abuse. Overall, CSNQ factors and the CAP abuse scale each distinguished between physical child abusers and nonabusers. The CAP abuse scale, however, provided the highest classification rates, and the rates were not improved by the addition of social support factors. In contrast to expectations, none of the social support factors distinguished between physical child abusers with a childhood history of physical abuse and the group of nonabusers with a childhood history of physical abuse.
    Journal of Interpersonal Violence 01/1994; 9(1):27-44. · 1.64 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Thirty-six mothers with a previous history of child abuse or child neglect or with no known previous history of child maltreatment participated in an experiment designed to assess reactions to a number of aversive stimuli. Both child-related and non-child-related stressful stimuli were presented, and a number of dependent variables including measures of attributional style and annoyance were employed to assess the situational specificity of responding. Analysis of the attributional data indicate that abusing mothers consistently ascribed more malevolent intentionality to their child than the other mothers. Situation and interaction effects were also present for the attributional measure. Results from the process annoyance measures indicate that highly significant situation effects were present. In addition, the abusing mothers were more annoyed across both the social and nonsocial stressors, suggesting that a generalized pattern of hyperresponsivity exists in this group. The present results are interpreted within a recently formulated cognitive-behavioral model of child abuse.
    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 07/1985; 53(3):335-43. · 4.85 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
1,177 Downloads
Available from
May 29, 2014