Article

Apuntes Sobre Una Historia Del Paradigma Dominante De La Psicología Social

Revista de Estudios Sociales 01/2004;
Source: DOAJ

ABSTRACT This article tries to offer a synthesis of historical development of the dominant paradigm in social psychology. It approaches to the origin of the concept, definition, authors and events that traditionally are considered like the foundation of this psychological field; additionally, it indicates the facts, theories, works, methods, and issues that are more significant in the short course of the empirical-analytical tradition in social psychology. In the same way, it offers an assessment of handbooks and serial publications that are definitive ones for the development of the field, and, finally, the paper shows its unique impact in psychological science.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
70 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Social psychololgy's status as a theoretical discipline is assessed. Whereas it has excelled as an experimental science, the field has generally eschewed broad theorizing and tended to limit its conceptualizations to relatively narrow, "mid-range" notions closely linked to the operational level of analysis. Such "theory shyness" may have spawned several negative consequences, including the tendency to invent new names for old concepts, fragmentation of the field, and isolation from the general cultural dialogue. Recently, steps have been taken to encourage greater theoretical activity by social psychologists, and there are now several major outlets for theoretical contributions. Further initiatives are needed, however, to instigate theoretical creativity, including ways of overcoming disciplinary risk aversion and the training of young social psychologists in ways and means of theory construction.
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 07/2001; 80(6):871-5. · 5.08 Impact Factor
  • 01/1986; Springer Verlag., ISBN: 0-387-96344-8
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: COLLEGE SS OVERHEARD AN EPILEPTIC SIEZURE. THEY BELIEVED EITHER THAT THEY ALONE HEARD THE EMERGENCY, OR THAT 1 OR 4 UNSEEN OTHERS WERE ALSO PRESENT. AS PREDICTED, THE PRESENCE OF OTHER BYSTANDERS REDUCED THE INDIVIDUAL'S FEELINGS OF PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND LOWERED HIS SPEED OF REPORTING (P < .01). IN GROUPS OF 3, MALES REPORTED NO FASTER THAN FEMALES, AND FEMALES REPORTED NO SLOWER WHEN THE 1 OTHER BYSTANDER WAS A MALE RATHER THAN A FEMALE. IN GENERAL, PERSONALITY AND BACKGROUND MEASURES WERE NOT PREDICTIVE OF HELPING. BYSTANDER INACTION IN REAL LIFE EMERGENCIES IS OFTEN EXPLAINED BY APATHY, ALIENATION, AND ANOMIE. RESULTS SUGGEST THAT THE EXPLANATION MAY LIE IN THE BYSTANDER'S RESPONSE TO OTHER OS THAN IN HIS INDIFFERENCE TO THE VICTIM.
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 05/1968; 8(4):377-83. · 5.08 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
0 Downloads
Available from