Article

Profesores de sustancia: el conocimiento de la materia para enseñanza

PROFESORADO 01/2005;
Source: DOAJ

ABSTRACT En este trabajo se aducen, en primer lugar, un conjunto de razones por las que, en el contexto norteamericano, es relevante el conocimiento de la materia en la formación del profesorado. Después se hace una revisión crítica de la investigación que se ha hecho en este área, centrándose en su propio programa de investigación sobre ¿Desarrollo del conocimiento en una profesión¿. Finalmente, se definen y exploran cuatro dimensiones sobresalientes del conocimiento de la materia para la enseñanza: conocimiento del contenido, conocimiento sustantivo, conocimiento sintáctico y creencias acerca de la materia.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
141 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Gudmundsdottir, S. & Shulman, L. 1987. Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Social Studies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 31, 59‐70. The role of teacher's pedagogical content knowledge in social studies is addressed through two case studies: a novice and a veteran teacher. We demonstrate that the important difference between the novice and the expert is manifested in a special kind of knowledge that is neither content nor pedagogy per se. It rests instead in pedagogical content knowledge, a form of teacher understanding that combines content, pedagogy and learner characteristics in a unique way.
    Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research - SCAND J EDUC RES. 01/1987; 31(2):59-70.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Student achievement test scores appear promising as indicators of teacher performance, but their use carries significant risks. Inappropriate tests improperly used may encourage undesirable shifts in curricular focus or poor teaching practices, and may unfairly favor teachers of more able classes. It is often said that standardized achievement test batteries are unsuitable for teacher evaluation, but few systematic alternatives have been suggested. The purposes of this paper are to analyze some problems in using student test scores to evaluate teachers and to propose an achievement-based model for teacher evaluation that is effective, affordable, fair, legally defensible, and politically acceptable. The system is designed only for detecting and documenting poor teacher performance; rewarding excellence in teaching is viewed as a separate problem, and is not addressed in this paper. In addition to pretesting and statistical adjustments for student aptitude differences, the proposed system relies upon attendance data and portfolios of student work to distinguish alternative explanations for poor test scores. While no single set of procedures can eliminate all errors, the proposed system, if carefully implemented, could expose teaching to constructive scrutiny, organize objective information about teaching adequacy, and help to guide its improvement.
    Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 01/1986; 8(1). · 1.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In considering the questions of what sense teachers make of their professional education and what they learn during teacher preparation, two case studies are presented, based on an analysis of interviews across the first year of teacher preparation. The first student was enrolled in an academic-learning program which emphasized the importance of theoretical and subject matter knowledge in learning to teach. Field experiences were limited, brief, and connected with specific course requirements. The other student participated in a decision-making program, emphasizing generic methods of teaching and research-based decision making with personal reflection. Regular time was spent in classrooms aiding, observing, and teaching small and large group lessons. The studies reveal how differences in personal history and formal preparation can help or hinder the transition from commonsense to professional thinking. They also suggest that very little normatively correct learning can be trusted to come about in teacher preparation without instruction that takes into account the preconceptions of future teachers. (Author/JD)
    12/1984;

Full-text

Download
1 Download
Available from