El modelo canadiense del desempeño ocupacional I

TOG : Revista de Terapia Ocupacional de la APGTO 01/2006;
Source: DOAJ

ABSTRACT RESUMENEn el siguiente artículo vamos a explorar el Modelo Canadiense del Desempeño Ocupacional (C.M.O.P.). Nos centraremos en el propósito del modelo, el contexto en el que surge, sus conceptos y creencias centrales, su visión del desempeño ocupacional, así como en las guías para el desarrollo de una práctica centrada en el cliente. Los conceptos centrales aparecen en el Anexo 1.En un segundo artículo exploraremos el Modelo Canadiense del Proceso del Desempeño Ocupacional (C.O.P.P.M.), así como el Instrumento de Valoración Canadiense del Desempeño Ocupacional (C.O.P.M.) también creados por los terapeutas canadienses para el desarrollo de una práctica centrada en el cliente. Un caso práctico será desarrollado. ABSTRACTIn the following article we are going to explore de Canadian Model of Occupational Performance, (C.M.O.P.). We will focus on the purpose of the model, its context, its concepts and believes, and its vision of the occupational performance, and the guidelines to develop a client centred approach. The key terms appear on Annex 1.In a second article we will explore the Canadian Occupational Performance Process Model and the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure also created by Canadian occupational therapists for the development of a client centred approach. A case example will be developed.

Download full-text


Available from: Salvador Simó Algado, Sep 05, 2015
  • The American journal of occupational therapy.: official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association 09/2003; 57(5):582-8. DOI:10.5014/ajot.57.5.582 · 1.70 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An individualistic conception of disability has been replaced by a socio-political definition. The socio-political model implies that disability stems from the failure of the social environment to adjust to the needs of people with disabilities rather than from the inability of disabled individuals to adapt to societal demands. This paper will examine the extent to which Canadian policies have changed to embrace this new definition. There has been some progress in policies related to shelter, transportation and recreation. However, policies related to income and employment are still individualistic in nature because policy change in these areas requires a major shift in governmental approach to unemployment and fundamental reform of the Social Assistance system. In a period of high unemployment, people with disabilities are viewed as surplus labour, and the Canadian government has found that high unemployment is politically tolerable. Obstacles to an increase in income support include a strong work ethic, the philosophy that social assistance benefits should be less than could be earned in the work-force, and the private insurance and litigation industries which benefit from the current income system. Other barriers to change are the lack of power of disabled groups and the dominance of professionals.
    Disability & Society 01/1990; 5(1):25-36. DOI:10.1080/02674649066780021 · 0.73 Impact Factor