International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making (Impact Factor: 1.41). 04/2012; 10(02). DOI: 10.1142/S0219622011004312


Group awareness information represents things such as group members' roles and responsibilities, their positions on an issue, their status, and the state of various group processes that group members know about when they work together. The group awareness information presented in this paper is designed to capture group member activities and their behaviors in web-based collaborative work. It consists of activity, availability, and commitment/disposition information. The first two parameters appear as a visual display representing cumulative data and changes accordingly when the group begins working together. The last parameter is captured during group work and is summarized at the end of the group work task. The application of this proposed scheme was designed and implemented in a web-based group decision support system. This paper reports on the results of a study in a controlled experiment and a field test experiment that examined group performance on a given task in a web-based group decision support system with and without group awareness information. In particular, the study examined how group awareness information impacts the quality of the work effort and a given task, group decision making by members in the same group and different groups, the communications among group members during the completion of an online collaborative authoring task, the cohesiveness among group members in a web-based group decision support system, and the commitment/disposition of engagement of each member of the work group.

1 Follower
11 Reads
  • Source
    • "Paper [10] showed that awareness can help to control the prevalence of disease, even though awareness programs cannot eradicate infection. Moreover, [4] focused on the group awareness, examined how group awareness information impacts the quality of the work effort. As for Human immunodeficiency virus, from paper [6], we know that the total infective population decreases for the increase in the awareness of the disease. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper, to better understand the impact of awareness and the network structure on epidemic transmission, we divide the population into four subpopulations corresponding to different physical states and conscious states, and we first propose a modified disease-awareness model, then verify the global stability of the disease-free and endemic equilibria, and finally present numerical simulations to demonstrate the theoretical analysis. By examining the spreading influences of model parameters, we find that the outbreak scale can be effectively controlled through increasing the spread rate of awareness or reducing the rate of awareness loss. That is to say, all sorts of media publicity are meaningful. Meanwhile, we find that infection will be affected by consciousness through the control variable.
    International Journal of Biomathematics 07/2013; 06(04). DOI:10.1142/S1793524513500253 · 0.65 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Advances in mobile computing and wireless communication are easing the evolution from traditional nomadic work to computer-mediated mobile collaborative work. Technology allows efficient and effective interaction among mobile users and also provides access to shared resources available to them. However, the features and capabilities of the communication infrastructure supporting these activities influence the type of coordination and collaboration employed by mobile collaborative applications in real work scenarios. Developers of these applications are typically unaware of the constraints the communication infrastructure imposes on mobile collaborative systems, because they are not easy to foresee. That leads to a high probability of communication problems in otherwise fully functional mobile collaborative support applications. This paper presents an experimental study with real devices and networks on a realistic physical environment that shows how ad hoc networks can effectively support mobile collaborative work and the practical limitations. The paper analyzes several networking issues and determines how they influence mobile collaborative work in various interaction scenarios. The paper also presents the lessons learned in the study and provides recommendations to deal with some networking issues related to real-world ad hoc networks.
    International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 11/2012; 11(06):1035-1063. DOI:10.1142/S0219622012400147 · 1.41 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Information visualization can accelerate perception, provide insight and control, and harness this flood of valuable data to gain a competitive advantage in making business decisions. Although such a statement seems to be obvious, there is a lack in the literature of practical evidence of the benefit of information visualization. The main contribution of this paper is to illustrate how, for a major European apparel retailer, the visualization of performance information plays a critical role in improving business decisions and in extracting insights from RFID-based performance measures. In this paper, we identify – based on a literature review – three fundamental managerial functions of information visualization, namely as: a communication medium, a knowledge management means, and a decision-support instrument. Then, we provide – based on real industrial case evidence – how information visualization supports business decision-making. Several examples are provided to evidence the benefit of information visualization through its three identified managerial functions. We find that – depending on the way performance information is shaped, communicated, and made interactive – it not only helps decision-making, but also offers a means of knowledge creation, as well as an appropriate communication channel.
    International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 05/2013; 13(2). DOI:10.1142/S0219622014500497 · 1.41 Impact Factor
Show more