Article

Adaptação de questionário de avaliação da qualidade de vida para aplicação em portadores de catarata

Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia (Impact Factor: 0.44). 01/2002; DOI: 10.1590/S0004-27492002000300002
Source: DOAJ

ABSTRACT Objetivo: Devido à perda visual que acarreta, a catarata pode impedir a realização de atividades cotidianas, influindo assim na qualidade de vida dos indivíduos afetados. Este trabalho tem como objetivo avaliar a aplicabilidade de questionário para avaliação da qualidade de vida de indivíduos portadores de catarata e testar a sua responsividade e confiabilidade. Métodos: Foram entrevistados 30 pacientes portadores de catarata com indicação cirúrgica. Utilizou-se questionário específico adaptado, sendo a mesma entrevista realizada duas vezes, com intervalo de uma hora. Resultados: Todas as questões tiveram mais de 80% de resposta sem que o entrevistador precisasse repetir a pergunta. A análise da consistência mostrou que apenas um paciente respondeu de forma discrepante quatro questões. Conclusão: O questionário adaptado pôde ser aplicado em grupo populacional de baixa escolaridade, representando instrumento válido para avaliação da qualidade de vida de pacientes com catarata.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Carlos Eduardo Leite Arieta, Jul 02, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
282 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To verify the quality of life in a Brazilian glaucoma population and the influence of possible modifiers (e.g., visual acuity, visual field impairment). Forty-five consecutive patients from CEROF - Federal University of Goias, Brazil were included prospectively in the study. The quality of life was assessed using the Portuguese version of the VFQ. Possible modifiers were evaluated, initially separately with the Spearman's Correlation and then together in a regression model. The mean age was 59.6 +/- 12.4 years. The mean quality of life score was 79 +/- 15 (range 45-100). Age (r = -0.402, p = 0.006), visual acuity in the better eye (r = -0.497, p = 0.001) and in the worse eye (r = -0.608, p < 0.001), Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson visual field grading scale in the better (r = -0.353, p = 0.01) and worse eye (r = -0.387, p = 0.009), visual field Mean Deviation (MD) in the better (r = 0.355, p = 0.01) and worse eye (r = 0.320, p = 0.04) and ability to perform a visual field test in both eyes (r = -0.397, p = 0.007) were significantly correlated with the quality of life scores. However, only age (younger, better quality of life, p = 0.008) and visual acuity in the better eye (direct relation, p = 0.04) were significant in the regression model (r = 0.633, r(2) = 0.401). The VFQ may be a useful tool to assess the quality of life in glaucoma patients. The preliminary results indicate that age and visual acuity in the better eye are the main factors related to the quality of life in these patients.
    Ophthalmic Epidemiology 10/2004; 11(4):263-70. DOI:10.1080/09286580490515251 · 1.27 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess the impact of refractive surgery on quality of life using the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument (NEI-RQL) and to evaluate the responsiveness of our Portuguese version of the NEI-RQL instrument to surgical correction of refractive error. In this prospective study, the NEI-RQL, a 42-item questionnaire with 13 scales, was self-administered by 96 patients of the Federal University of São Paulo-UNIFESP, between March 2002 and April 2003, before and after undergoing surgical correction of refractive error. An overall scale score was determined by calculating the mean of the 13 scale scores. Differences between preoperative and postoperative NEI-RQL scores were examined. Responsiveness was assessed by calculating the size of effect for each scale of the instrument. Refractive surgery was associated with statistically significant improvements in scores for all the scales of the NEI-RQL. The NEI-RQL has shown to be responsive to surgical correction of refractive error, and the calculated effect sizes ranged from 0.4 ("glare") to 4.19 ("expectations"). The NEI-RQL is highly responsive to changes in vision-related quality of life resulting from keratorefractive surgery. We observed improvements in all the scales of the NEI-RQL, after surgery.
    Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia 01/2005; 68(6):789-96. DOI:10.1590/S0004-27492005000600015 · 0.44 Impact Factor